Buckle up for more subscriptions
April 16, 2025
FrankAllen
25

Two weeks back, Garmin made waves by announcing a new subscription model for its Garmin Connect app. Previously, users enjoyed free access to detailed metrics and training plans, but now, the fitness tech giant is tucking premium AI summaries and other features behind a paywall. The backlash was swift and vocal across The Verge comments, my social media, and the r/Garmin subreddit, with users decrying this move as yet another case of enshittification.
Then, just days ago, Polar, a competitor to Garmin, jumped on the subscription bandwagon with its Polar Fitness Plan. While there's no AI element here, the company is now charging for training plans that were once offered for free, at least to some extent.
The trend toward subscriptions in the wearable tech industry isn't new. It arguably started with Apple's significant pivot to services back in 2019, but Garmin and Polar's moves are particularly striking. Enthusiasts of rugged smartwatches have traditionally justified the high costs of these devices because they came with all features included.
"Garmins have always felt a little on the high side price-wise, but it was justifiable as there was no ongoing cost," Aaron Fisher, a Garmin loyalist, shared with me. "Strava has taken more and more and hidden it behind a paywall, and I fear this will end up the same way."
Customer Concerns
Robbie Kellman Baxter, a subscriptions expert and author of The Membership Economy and The Forever Transaction, points out that customers are understandably worried about premium features being locked behind paywalls. "They have told customers not to worry — that the base software will always be available for free. But they have not been clear about whether or how much they will continue to improve the free version."
It's a frustration that's all too familiar. Baxter notes that customers generally resist paying for features that were once free. This sentiment was evident when Oura Health faced backlash for introducing a subscription with the Oura Ring Gen 3 in 2021. Similarly, tech YouTuber Marques Brownlee (MKBHD) felt the internet's wrath when he started a subscription for his wallpaper app, and BMW drew ire for attempting to charge monthly for heated seats in its cars.
Yet, consumers might need to brace themselves for more of this in the future. Hardware sales alone aren't cutting it anymore, and President Trump's tariffs are only likely to intensify the push toward subscriptions.
The Impact of Tariffs
Experts have told The Verge that gadget prices are set to rise due to these tariffs. This could lead to short-term buying sprees as people rush to purchase devices before prices go up. In the longer term, though, it might mean consumers hold onto their gadgets longer and buy less frequently. In such a scenario, charging for services becomes a crucial revenue stream.
"If hardware becomes more expensive, software will be a way for hardware companies to grow," Baxter explains. She suggests that tariffs will push companies to accelerate their focus on software and software-as-a-service subscriptions. "It also might change how they manufacture their products—designing for long-term stability and software flexibility. If companies designed hardware to last twice as long, and to deliver much of the value through software upgrades, they might be able to funnel more of their revenue through the 'software' side than the 'hardware' side."
Convincing Customers
The challenge lies in convincing customers that these subscriptions are worth the cost. Simply adding new features without considering their value can alienate loyal users. In the fitness tech world, for instance, athletes have criticized Strava's AI summaries as being of little use, likening them to "reading a book report a third-grader wrote."
It seems that subscription fatigue isn't going away anytime soon. Companies will need to tread carefully to maintain the trust and loyalty of their user base.
Related article
Wikipedia is giving AI developers its data to fend off bot scrapers
Wikipedia's New Strategy to Manage AI Data Scraping
Wikipedia, through the Wikimedia Foundation, is taking a proactive step to manage the impact of AI data scraping on its servers. On Wednesday, they announced a collaboration with Kaggle, a platform owned by Google and dedicated to data science and
YouTube Backs 'No Fakes Act' to Combat Unauthorized AI Replicas
Senators Chris Coons (D-DE) and Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) are once again pushing forward their Nurture Originals, Foster Art, and Keep Entertainment Safe, or NO FAKES, Act. This legislation aims to set clear rules about creating AI-generated copies of someone's face, name, or voice. After being introd
Microsoft Terminates Employee Who Labeled AI Executive as 'War Profiteer'
Microsoft Terminates Employee After Disruption at 50th Anniversary Event
Microsoft has dismissed an employee, Ibtihal Aboussad, following a disruption at the company's 50th-anniversary celebration. According to an email obtained by The Verge, Microsoft cited "acts of misconduct" as the reason for A
Comments (20)
0/200
GeorgeKing
April 17, 2025 at 4:12:35 AM GMT
Garmin's new subscription model is a bummer! 😕 I used to love the free detailed metrics and plans, but now they're charging for AI summaries? It's a cash grab, but I gotta admit, the AI summaries are pretty slick when you pay up. Maybe they'll rethink this if enough of us complain! 🤞
0
BrianWalker
April 17, 2025 at 8:40:20 AM GMT
ガーミンの新しいサブスクリプションモデルはガッカリですね😕。以前は無料で詳細なメトリクスやトレーニングプランが使えたのに、今はAIサマリーに料金がかかるなんて!でも、有料にしてもAIサマリーはかなり便利です。みんなが文句を言えば、ガーミンも考え直すかもね🤞。
0
HaroldLopez
April 17, 2025 at 6:07:33 AM GMT
가민의 새로운 구독 모델은 실망스럽네요 😕. 예전에는 상세한 메트릭스와 훈련 계획을 무료로 사용할 수 있었는데, 이제 AI 요약에 돈을 내야 한다니! 그래도 돈을 내고 쓰면 AI 요약이 꽤 유용해요. 우리 다 같이 불만을 말하면 가민이 다시 생각할지도 몰라요 🤞.
0
CarlGarcia
April 17, 2025 at 11:58:12 PM GMT
O novo modelo de assinatura da Garmin é uma decepção! 😕 Eu adorava os métricas detalhadas e planos de treino grátis, mas agora cobram por resumos de AI? É um golpe de dinheiro, mas devo admitir, os resumos de AI são bem legais quando você paga. Talvez eles repensem se muitos de nós reclamarmos! 🤞
0
SebastianAnderson
April 17, 2025 at 8:48:03 PM GMT
¡El nuevo modelo de suscripción de Garmin es una decepción! 😕 Me encantaba tener acceso gratuito a métricas detalladas y planes de entrenamiento, pero ahora cobran por los resúmenes de IA. Es un robo, pero debo admitir que los resúmenes de IA son geniales cuando pagas. Quizás si suficientes de nosotros nos quejamos, lo reconsiderarán. 🤞
0
NicholasHernández
April 17, 2025 at 10:29:37 PM GMT
Garmin's new subscription model is a total bummer! 😡 I used to love the free detailed metrics, but now they're hiding the good stuff behind a paywall. I get that they need to make money, but this feels like a cash grab. I'm thinking of switching to another brand if this keeps up. Anyone else feel the same?
0






Two weeks back, Garmin made waves by announcing a new subscription model for its Garmin Connect app. Previously, users enjoyed free access to detailed metrics and training plans, but now, the fitness tech giant is tucking premium AI summaries and other features behind a paywall. The backlash was swift and vocal across The Verge comments, my social media, and the r/Garmin subreddit, with users decrying this move as yet another case of enshittification.
Then, just days ago, Polar, a competitor to Garmin, jumped on the subscription bandwagon with its Polar Fitness Plan. While there's no AI element here, the company is now charging for training plans that were once offered for free, at least to some extent.
The trend toward subscriptions in the wearable tech industry isn't new. It arguably started with Apple's significant pivot to services back in 2019, but Garmin and Polar's moves are particularly striking. Enthusiasts of rugged smartwatches have traditionally justified the high costs of these devices because they came with all features included.
"Garmins have always felt a little on the high side price-wise, but it was justifiable as there was no ongoing cost," Aaron Fisher, a Garmin loyalist, shared with me. "Strava has taken more and more and hidden it behind a paywall, and I fear this will end up the same way."
Customer Concerns
Robbie Kellman Baxter, a subscriptions expert and author of The Membership Economy and The Forever Transaction, points out that customers are understandably worried about premium features being locked behind paywalls. "They have told customers not to worry — that the base software will always be available for free. But they have not been clear about whether or how much they will continue to improve the free version."
It's a frustration that's all too familiar. Baxter notes that customers generally resist paying for features that were once free. This sentiment was evident when Oura Health faced backlash for introducing a subscription with the Oura Ring Gen 3 in 2021. Similarly, tech YouTuber Marques Brownlee (MKBHD) felt the internet's wrath when he started a subscription for his wallpaper app, and BMW drew ire for attempting to charge monthly for heated seats in its cars.
Yet, consumers might need to brace themselves for more of this in the future. Hardware sales alone aren't cutting it anymore, and President Trump's tariffs are only likely to intensify the push toward subscriptions.
The Impact of Tariffs
Experts have told The Verge that gadget prices are set to rise due to these tariffs. This could lead to short-term buying sprees as people rush to purchase devices before prices go up. In the longer term, though, it might mean consumers hold onto their gadgets longer and buy less frequently. In such a scenario, charging for services becomes a crucial revenue stream.
"If hardware becomes more expensive, software will be a way for hardware companies to grow," Baxter explains. She suggests that tariffs will push companies to accelerate their focus on software and software-as-a-service subscriptions. "It also might change how they manufacture their products—designing for long-term stability and software flexibility. If companies designed hardware to last twice as long, and to deliver much of the value through software upgrades, they might be able to funnel more of their revenue through the 'software' side than the 'hardware' side."
Convincing Customers
The challenge lies in convincing customers that these subscriptions are worth the cost. Simply adding new features without considering their value can alienate loyal users. In the fitness tech world, for instance, athletes have criticized Strava's AI summaries as being of little use, likening them to "reading a book report a third-grader wrote."
It seems that subscription fatigue isn't going away anytime soon. Companies will need to tread carefully to maintain the trust and loyalty of their user base.




Garmin's new subscription model is a bummer! 😕 I used to love the free detailed metrics and plans, but now they're charging for AI summaries? It's a cash grab, but I gotta admit, the AI summaries are pretty slick when you pay up. Maybe they'll rethink this if enough of us complain! 🤞




ガーミンの新しいサブスクリプションモデルはガッカリですね😕。以前は無料で詳細なメトリクスやトレーニングプランが使えたのに、今はAIサマリーに料金がかかるなんて!でも、有料にしてもAIサマリーはかなり便利です。みんなが文句を言えば、ガーミンも考え直すかもね🤞。




가민의 새로운 구독 모델은 실망스럽네요 😕. 예전에는 상세한 메트릭스와 훈련 계획을 무료로 사용할 수 있었는데, 이제 AI 요약에 돈을 내야 한다니! 그래도 돈을 내고 쓰면 AI 요약이 꽤 유용해요. 우리 다 같이 불만을 말하면 가민이 다시 생각할지도 몰라요 🤞.




O novo modelo de assinatura da Garmin é uma decepção! 😕 Eu adorava os métricas detalhadas e planos de treino grátis, mas agora cobram por resumos de AI? É um golpe de dinheiro, mas devo admitir, os resumos de AI são bem legais quando você paga. Talvez eles repensem se muitos de nós reclamarmos! 🤞




¡El nuevo modelo de suscripción de Garmin es una decepción! 😕 Me encantaba tener acceso gratuito a métricas detalladas y planes de entrenamiento, pero ahora cobran por los resúmenes de IA. Es un robo, pero debo admitir que los resúmenes de IA son geniales cuando pagas. Quizás si suficientes de nosotros nos quejamos, lo reconsiderarán. 🤞




Garmin's new subscription model is a total bummer! 😡 I used to love the free detailed metrics, but now they're hiding the good stuff behind a paywall. I get that they need to make money, but this feels like a cash grab. I'm thinking of switching to another brand if this keeps up. Anyone else feel the same?












