HomeGrammarly's 'Expert Review' Feature Lacks Actual Human Experts
Grammarly's latest feature claims to enhance your writing with insights from renowned authors, thinkers, and even some prominent tech journalists.
Released in August 2025 as part of a suite of new AI tools, Expert Review pops up in Grammarly's main writing assistant sidebar. It offers revision suggestions supposedly crafted "from the perspective" of various subject matter authorities.
As Wired highlighted, Grammarly presents this feedback as if it's coming directly from famous writers, both contemporary and historical. According to The Verge, the suggestions can sometimes even appear to originate from tech reporters at outlets like The Verge, Wired, Bloomberg, and The New York Times.
Naturally, this made me wonder: What about TechCrunch? I pasted an early version of this article into Grammarly, hoping for tips from my colleagues. Instead, the tool advised me to "add ethical context" like Casey Newton, "leverage the anecdote for reader alignment" like Kara Swisher, and "pose the bigger accountability question" like Timnit Gebru.
The result was quite a letdown. While the feature itself feels somewhat poorly conceived, if all those other publications are getting name-checked, what does that say about us?
To state what's already clear, none of these individuals seem to be involved with Expert Reviews or to have granted Grammarly permission to use their names. Alex Gay, VP of Product and Corporate Marketing at Grammarly's parent company Superhuman, explained to The Verge that these experts are referenced "because their published works are publicly available and widely cited."
In its user guide for the feature, Grammarly adds a clarification: "References to experts in Expert Review are for informational purposes only and do not indicate any affiliation with Grammarly or endorsement by those individuals or entities."
That statement is fairly straightforward, I suppose. But it begs the question: How exactly is this an "expert review"? Perhaps it isn't at all, as historian C.E. Aubin pointed out to Wired: "These are not expert reviews, because there are no 'experts' involved in producing them."
Related article
Anthropic Study Links Polished AI Content to Reduced Human Thinking
When you see AI instantly produce a well-structured, logically clear piece of code or document, are you tempted to trust it without a second thought? According to AIbase, the leading AI company Anthropic recently published a research report titled "A
UK Government Departments Clash Over Energy Needs for AI Data Centers
The UK government is grappling with a major challenge: advancing clean energy while aiming to become a global leader in artificial intelligence. Yet serious inconsistencies appear between the departments responsible for these goals. The Department fo
Cyberspace Administration of China mandates tagging of AI-generated and fictional short videos
The Cyberspace Administration of China has rolled out a comprehensive plan to standardize short video content labeling, mandating that platforms offer six required tags—including "AI-generated content"—ushering in a new era of mandatory transparency
Related Special Topic Recommendations
Comic Creation
Top AI Auto-Colorization Tools for Manga: Apply Flat Colors with Zero Consistency Errors
Discover the 2026 best AI auto-colorization tools for manga at XIX.AI. Our curated list features top-rated, game-changing solutions that apply flat colors with zero consistency errors, boosting your productivity. Explore free vs paid comparisons, real-world tests, and weekly updated rankings to find your perfect match. Unlock your AI edge today.
10 tools
xix.ai
writing
Top AI Fiction Profile Creators: Generate Consistent Character Motivations and Fatal Flaws
Discover the 2026 best AI fiction profile creators for crafting deep characters. XIX.AI's curated list features top-rated, game-changing tools that generate consistent motivations and fatal flaws. Compare free vs paid options with real-world tests. Unlock your storytelling potential now.
10 tools
xix.ai
Business
Top AI Pricing Optimization Software: Track Competitors & Auto-Adjust Store Prices
Discover the 2026 best AI pricing optimization software on XIX.AI. Our curated list features top-rated, game-changing tools that track competitors and auto-adjust your store prices for maximum profit. Compare free vs paid options with real-world tests. Unlock your pricing edge now.
10 tools
xix.ai
code
Best AI Code Reviewers: Automate Clean Code Compliance & Refactor Legacy Repo Files
Discover the 2026 best AI code reviewers on XIX.AI. Our curated list features top-rated, game-changing tools for automating clean code compliance and refactoring legacy repo files. Compare free vs paid options with real-world tests and weekly updated rankings. Unlock your AI edge today.
10 tools
xix.ai
Text-to-speech
Top AI TTS Apps for Dyslexia: Support Learning and Reading Efficiency for Students
Discover the 2026 latest top-rated AI TTS apps curated for dyslexia support. Our expert rankings compare free vs paid tools, highlighting powerful features for enhanced reading efficiency and learning. Explore must-try, game-changing solutions to unlock student potential. Start your journey at XIX.AI.
10 tools
xix.ai
Comic Creation
Top AI Generators for Shonen Manga: Create High-Octane Action Sequences & Energy Effects
Discover the 2026 best AI generators for Shonen manga at XIX.AI. Our top-rated, curated list features powerful tools for creating high-octane action sequences and dynamic energy effects. Compare free vs paid options with real-world tests. Unlock your creative potential and start crafting epic manga today!
15 tools
xix.ai
Comments (2)
0/500
![JuanEvans]()
Wait, so 'Expert Review' doesn't involve actual experts? That's a bit misleading. I used it and the suggestions felt generic, like any other AI tool. The marketing hype is real, but the 'expertise' seems to be just a fancy label for their LLM. Makes you wonder about the ethics of naming features like this.
![EricAllen]()
Grammarly wirbt mit Promi-Experten, aber es ist wohl nur KI, die deren Stil nachahmt? Das ist irgendwie enttäuschend. Als Nutzer hätte ich mir echte menschliche Rückmeldung gewünscht, nicht nur eine weitere KI-Schicht. Die Marketing-Sprache ist etwas irreführend, finde ich. 🤔
Grammarly's latest feature claims to enhance your writing with insights from renowned authors, thinkers, and even some prominent tech journalists.
Released in August 2025 as part of a suite of new AI tools, Expert Review pops up in Grammarly's main writing assistant sidebar. It offers revision suggestions supposedly crafted "from the perspective" of various subject matter authorities.
As Wired highlighted, Grammarly presents this feedback as if it's coming directly from famous writers, both contemporary and historical. According to The Verge, the suggestions can sometimes even appear to originate from tech reporters at outlets like The Verge, Wired, Bloomberg, and The New York Times.
Naturally, this made me wonder: What about TechCrunch? I pasted an early version of this article into Grammarly, hoping for tips from my colleagues. Instead, the tool advised me to "add ethical context" like Casey Newton, "leverage the anecdote for reader alignment" like Kara Swisher, and "pose the bigger accountability question" like Timnit Gebru.
The result was quite a letdown. While the feature itself feels somewhat poorly conceived, if all those other publications are getting name-checked, what does that say about us?
To state what's already clear, none of these individuals seem to be involved with Expert Reviews or to have granted Grammarly permission to use their names. Alex Gay, VP of Product and Corporate Marketing at Grammarly's parent company Superhuman, explained to The Verge that these experts are referenced "because their published works are publicly available and widely cited."
In its user guide for the feature, Grammarly adds a clarification: "References to experts in Expert Review are for informational purposes only and do not indicate any affiliation with Grammarly or endorsement by those individuals or entities."
That statement is fairly straightforward, I suppose. But it begs the question: How exactly is this an "expert review"? Perhaps it isn't at all, as historian C.E. Aubin pointed out to Wired: "These are not expert reviews, because there are no 'experts' involved in producing them."
Anthropic Study Links Polished AI Content to Reduced Human Thinking
When you see AI instantly produce a well-structured, logically clear piece of code or document, are you tempted to trust it without a second thought? According to AIbase, the leading AI company Anthropic recently published a research report titled "A
UK Government Departments Clash Over Energy Needs for AI Data Centers
The UK government is grappling with a major challenge: advancing clean energy while aiming to become a global leader in artificial intelligence. Yet serious inconsistencies appear between the departments responsible for these goals. The Department fo
Cyberspace Administration of China mandates tagging of AI-generated and fictional short videos
The Cyberspace Administration of China has rolled out a comprehensive plan to standardize short video content labeling, mandating that platforms offer six required tags—including "AI-generated content"—ushering in a new era of mandatory transparency
Discover the 2026 best AI auto-colorization tools for manga at XIX.AI. Our curated list features top-rated, game-changing solutions that apply flat colors with zero consistency errors, boosting your productivity. Explore free vs paid comparisons, real-world tests, and weekly updated rankings to find your perfect match. Unlock your AI edge today.
10 tools
xix.ai
Discover the 2026 best AI fiction profile creators for crafting deep characters. XIX.AI's curated list features top-rated, game-changing tools that generate consistent motivations and fatal flaws. Compare free vs paid options with real-world tests. Unlock your storytelling potential now.
10 tools
xix.ai
Discover the 2026 best AI pricing optimization software on XIX.AI. Our curated list features top-rated, game-changing tools that track competitors and auto-adjust your store prices for maximum profit. Compare free vs paid options with real-world tests. Unlock your pricing edge now.
10 tools
xix.ai
Discover the 2026 best AI code reviewers on XIX.AI. Our curated list features top-rated, game-changing tools for automating clean code compliance and refactoring legacy repo files. Compare free vs paid options with real-world tests and weekly updated rankings. Unlock your AI edge today.
10 tools
xix.ai
Discover the 2026 latest top-rated AI TTS apps curated for dyslexia support. Our expert rankings compare free vs paid tools, highlighting powerful features for enhanced reading efficiency and learning. Explore must-try, game-changing solutions to unlock student potential. Start your journey at XIX.AI.
10 tools
xix.ai
Discover the 2026 best AI generators for Shonen manga at XIX.AI. Our top-rated, curated list features powerful tools for creating high-octane action sequences and dynamic energy effects. Compare free vs paid options with real-world tests. Unlock your creative potential and start crafting epic manga today!
15 tools
xix.ai
Wait, so 'Expert Review' doesn't involve actual experts? That's a bit misleading. I used it and the suggestions felt generic, like any other AI tool. The marketing hype is real, but the 'expertise' seems to be just a fancy label for their LLM. Makes you wonder about the ethics of naming features like this.
Grammarly wirbt mit Promi-Experten, aber es ist wohl nur KI, die deren Stil nachahmt? Das ist irgendwie enttäuschend. Als Nutzer hätte ich mir echte menschliche Rückmeldung gewünscht, nicht nur eine weitere KI-Schicht. Die Marketing-Sprache ist etwas irreführend, finde ich. 🤔
