OpenAI Labels DeepSeek 'State-Controlled,' Urges Ban on 'PRC-Produced' Models
April 10, 2025
AnthonyScott
13

In a recent policy proposal, OpenAI has labeled the Chinese AI lab DeepSeek as "state-subsidized" and "state-controlled," suggesting that the U.S. government should contemplate banning models developed by DeepSeek and similar operations supported by the People's Republic of China (PRC).
This proposal, submitted as part of the Trump administration's "AI Action Plan" initiative, argues that DeepSeek's models, such as its R1 "reasoning" model, pose security risks due to Chinese legal requirements that mandate compliance with government requests for user data. OpenAI recommends banning "PRC-produced" models in countries classified as "Tier 1" under the Biden administration's export rules to mitigate privacy and security concerns, including the risk of intellectual property theft.
It's not clear whether OpenAI's use of "models" includes DeepSeek's API, its open models, or both. Interestingly, DeepSeek's open models don't have built-in mechanisms for the Chinese government to access user data; instead, they are hosted by companies like Microsoft, Perplexity, and Amazon.
OpenAI has previously accused DeepSeek, which gained recognition earlier this year, of extracting knowledge from OpenAI's models in violation of its terms of service. The new claims—that DeepSeek is backed and controlled by the PRC—mark a significant escalation in OpenAI's ongoing dispute with the Chinese lab.
There's no direct evidence linking DeepSeek, a spin-off from the quantitative hedge fund High-Flyer, to the Chinese government. However, the PRC has shown a growing interest in DeepSeek recently, highlighted by a meeting between DeepSeek founder Liang Wenfeng and Chinese leader Xi Jinping a few weeks ago.
Updated 3/15 8:38 p.m. Pacific: Days after this story hit the news, OpenAI spokesperson Liz Bourgeois provided the following clarification:
“We're not pushing for restrictions on individuals using models like DeepSeek. Our proposal focuses on modifying U.S. export rules to enable more countries to access U.S. computing resources, provided their datacenters don't use PRC technology that could pose security risks. This isn't about limiting chip access based on fears they'll be redirected to the PRC. Our aim is to increase compute and AI access for more countries and people.”
OpenAI's own AI-powered deep research tool describes this statement as "equivocal, using deflective and softening language that somewhat contradicts the more assertive position in the original submission."
Related article
Former DeepSeeker and collaborators release new method for training reliable AI agents: RAGEN
The Year of AI Agents: A Closer Look at 2025's Expectations and Realities2025 was heralded by many experts as the year when AI agents—specialized AI systems powered by advanced large language and multimodal models from companies like OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, and DeepSeek—would finally take center
Google Search Introduces 'AI Mode' for Complex, Multi-Part Queries
Google Unveils "AI Mode" in Search to Rival Perplexity AI and ChatGPTGoogle is stepping up its game in the AI arena with the launch of an experimental "AI Mode" feature in its Search engine. Aimed at taking on the likes of Perplexity AI and OpenAI's ChatGPT Search, this new mode was announced on Wed
YouTube Backs 'No Fakes Act' to Combat Unauthorized AI Replicas
Senators Chris Coons (D-DE) and Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) are once again pushing forward their Nurture Originals, Foster Art, and Keep Entertainment Safe, or NO FAKES, Act. This legislation aims to set clear rules about creating AI-generated copies of someone's face, name, or voice. After being introd
Comments (40)
0/200
FredMartínez
April 10, 2025 at 8:02:08 AM GMT
OpenAI calling DeepSeek 'state-controlled' and suggesting a ban? That's a bit harsh, isn't it? I get the security concerns, but shouldn't we be promoting global collaboration in AI instead of drawing lines? Feels like we're heading back to the Cold War era!
0
RoySmith
April 10, 2025 at 8:02:08 AM GMT
OpenAIがDeepSeekを「国家管理」と呼び、禁止を提案するなんて、ちょっと厳しすぎませんか?セキュリティの懸念は理解できますが、AIでのグローバルな協力の促進をすべきでは?冷戦時代に戻っている気がします!
0
FredYoung
April 10, 2025 at 8:02:08 AM GMT
오픈AI가 DeepSeek을 '국가 통제'라고 부르고 금지를 제안하다니, 너무 심하지 않나요? 보안 우려는 이해하지만, AI에서 글로벌 협력을 촉진해야 하지 않나요? 냉전 시대로 돌아가는 것 같아요!
0
KeithHarris
April 10, 2025 at 8:02:08 AM GMT
OpenAI chamando DeepSeek de 'controlado pelo estado' e sugerindo uma proibição? Isso não é um pouco duro demais? Entendo as preocupações de segurança, mas não deveríamos estar promovendo a colaboração global em IA em vez de traçar linhas? Parece que estamos voltando à era da Guerra Fria!
0
AlbertThomas
April 10, 2025 at 8:02:08 AM GMT
¿OpenAI llamando a DeepSeek 'controlado por el estado' y sugiriendo una prohibición? ¿No es eso un poco duro? Entiendo las preocupaciones de seguridad, pero ¿no deberíamos estar promoviendo la colaboración global en IA en lugar de trazar líneas? ¡Parece que estamos volviendo a la era de la Guerra Fría!
0
RalphJackson
April 10, 2025 at 12:45:28 PM GMT
OpenAI's move to label DeepSeek as state-controlled feels a bit heavy-handed. I get the security concerns, but outright banning PRC-produced models? That's a bit extreme, isn't it? Maybe we need more nuanced policies rather than just slamming the door shut. Food for thought, OpenAI!
0






In a recent policy proposal, OpenAI has labeled the Chinese AI lab DeepSeek as "state-subsidized" and "state-controlled," suggesting that the U.S. government should contemplate banning models developed by DeepSeek and similar operations supported by the People's Republic of China (PRC).
This proposal, submitted as part of the Trump administration's "AI Action Plan" initiative, argues that DeepSeek's models, such as its R1 "reasoning" model, pose security risks due to Chinese legal requirements that mandate compliance with government requests for user data. OpenAI recommends banning "PRC-produced" models in countries classified as "Tier 1" under the Biden administration's export rules to mitigate privacy and security concerns, including the risk of intellectual property theft.
It's not clear whether OpenAI's use of "models" includes DeepSeek's API, its open models, or both. Interestingly, DeepSeek's open models don't have built-in mechanisms for the Chinese government to access user data; instead, they are hosted by companies like Microsoft, Perplexity, and Amazon.
OpenAI has previously accused DeepSeek, which gained recognition earlier this year, of extracting knowledge from OpenAI's models in violation of its terms of service. The new claims—that DeepSeek is backed and controlled by the PRC—mark a significant escalation in OpenAI's ongoing dispute with the Chinese lab.
There's no direct evidence linking DeepSeek, a spin-off from the quantitative hedge fund High-Flyer, to the Chinese government. However, the PRC has shown a growing interest in DeepSeek recently, highlighted by a meeting between DeepSeek founder Liang Wenfeng and Chinese leader Xi Jinping a few weeks ago.
Updated 3/15 8:38 p.m. Pacific: Days after this story hit the news, OpenAI spokesperson Liz Bourgeois provided the following clarification:
“We're not pushing for restrictions on individuals using models like DeepSeek. Our proposal focuses on modifying U.S. export rules to enable more countries to access U.S. computing resources, provided their datacenters don't use PRC technology that could pose security risks. This isn't about limiting chip access based on fears they'll be redirected to the PRC. Our aim is to increase compute and AI access for more countries and people.”
OpenAI's own AI-powered deep research tool describes this statement as "equivocal, using deflective and softening language that somewhat contradicts the more assertive position in the original submission."




OpenAI calling DeepSeek 'state-controlled' and suggesting a ban? That's a bit harsh, isn't it? I get the security concerns, but shouldn't we be promoting global collaboration in AI instead of drawing lines? Feels like we're heading back to the Cold War era!




OpenAIがDeepSeekを「国家管理」と呼び、禁止を提案するなんて、ちょっと厳しすぎませんか?セキュリティの懸念は理解できますが、AIでのグローバルな協力の促進をすべきでは?冷戦時代に戻っている気がします!




오픈AI가 DeepSeek을 '국가 통제'라고 부르고 금지를 제안하다니, 너무 심하지 않나요? 보안 우려는 이해하지만, AI에서 글로벌 협력을 촉진해야 하지 않나요? 냉전 시대로 돌아가는 것 같아요!




OpenAI chamando DeepSeek de 'controlado pelo estado' e sugerindo uma proibição? Isso não é um pouco duro demais? Entendo as preocupações de segurança, mas não deveríamos estar promovendo a colaboração global em IA em vez de traçar linhas? Parece que estamos voltando à era da Guerra Fria!




¿OpenAI llamando a DeepSeek 'controlado por el estado' y sugiriendo una prohibición? ¿No es eso un poco duro? Entiendo las preocupaciones de seguridad, pero ¿no deberíamos estar promoviendo la colaboración global en IA en lugar de trazar líneas? ¡Parece que estamos volviendo a la era de la Guerra Fría!




OpenAI's move to label DeepSeek as state-controlled feels a bit heavy-handed. I get the security concerns, but outright banning PRC-produced models? That's a bit extreme, isn't it? Maybe we need more nuanced policies rather than just slamming the door shut. Food for thought, OpenAI!












