option
Home
News
OpenAI Labels DeepSeek 'State-Controlled,' Urges Ban on 'PRC-Produced' Models

OpenAI Labels DeepSeek 'State-Controlled,' Urges Ban on 'PRC-Produced' Models

April 10, 2025
164

OpenAI Labels DeepSeek

In a recent policy proposal, OpenAI has labeled the Chinese AI lab DeepSeek as "state-subsidized" and "state-controlled," suggesting that the U.S. government should contemplate banning models developed by DeepSeek and similar operations supported by the People's Republic of China (PRC).

This proposal, submitted as part of the Trump administration's "AI Action Plan" initiative, argues that DeepSeek's models, such as its R1 "reasoning" model, pose security risks due to Chinese legal requirements that mandate compliance with government requests for user data. OpenAI recommends banning "PRC-produced" models in countries classified as "Tier 1" under the Biden administration's export rules to mitigate privacy and security concerns, including the risk of intellectual property theft.

It's not clear whether OpenAI's use of "models" includes DeepSeek's API, its open models, or both. Interestingly, DeepSeek's open models don't have built-in mechanisms for the Chinese government to access user data; instead, they are hosted by companies like Microsoft, Perplexity, and Amazon.

OpenAI has previously accused DeepSeek, which gained recognition earlier this year, of extracting knowledge from OpenAI's models in violation of its terms of service. The new claims—that DeepSeek is backed and controlled by the PRC—mark a significant escalation in OpenAI's ongoing dispute with the Chinese lab.

There's no direct evidence linking DeepSeek, a spin-off from the quantitative hedge fund High-Flyer, to the Chinese government. However, the PRC has shown a growing interest in DeepSeek recently, highlighted by a meeting between DeepSeek founder Liang Wenfeng and Chinese leader Xi Jinping a few weeks ago.

Updated 3/15 8:38 p.m. Pacific: Days after this story hit the news, OpenAI spokesperson Liz Bourgeois provided the following clarification:

“We're not pushing for restrictions on individuals using models like DeepSeek. Our proposal focuses on modifying U.S. export rules to enable more countries to access U.S. computing resources, provided their datacenters don't use PRC technology that could pose security risks. This isn't about limiting chip access based on fears they'll be redirected to the PRC. Our aim is to increase compute and AI access for more countries and people.”

OpenAI's own AI-powered deep research tool describes this statement as "equivocal, using deflective and softening language that somewhat contradicts the more assertive position in the original submission."

Related article
Oracle's $40B Nvidia Chip Investment Boosts Texas AI Data Center Oracle's $40B Nvidia Chip Investment Boosts Texas AI Data Center Oracle is set to invest approximately $40 billion in Nvidia chips to power a major new data center in Texas, developed by OpenAI, as reported by the Financial Times. This deal, one of the largest chip
SoftBank Acquires $676M Sharp Factory for AI Data Center in Japan SoftBank Acquires $676M Sharp Factory for AI Data Center in Japan SoftBank is advancing its goal to establish a major AI hub in Japan, both independently and through partnerships like OpenAI. The tech giant confirmed on Friday it will invest $676 million to acquire
Adobe and Figma Integrate OpenAI's Advanced Image Generation Model Adobe and Figma Integrate OpenAI's Advanced Image Generation Model OpenAI’s enhanced image generation in ChatGPT has driven a surge in users, fueled by its ability to produce Studio Ghibli-style visuals and unique designs, and is now expanding to other platforms. The
Comments (50)
0/200
JuanWhite
JuanWhite August 10, 2025 at 3:00:59 AM EDT

This is wild! OpenAI calling out DeepSeek as 'state-controlled' feels like a sci-fi plot twist. Is this about tech rivalry or real security concerns? 🤔 Curious to see how this plays out in the AI world.

SamuelEvans
SamuelEvans August 5, 2025 at 11:00:59 PM EDT

This article is wild! Calling DeepSeek 'state-controlled' feels like a stretch—where’s the proof? I get the security concerns, but banning AI models outright seems like overkill. What’s next, a global AI turf war? 🤔

ScottJackson
ScottJackson August 5, 2025 at 3:00:59 AM EDT

OpenAI's move to label DeepSeek as 'state-controlled' feels like a strategic jab in the AI race. It's intriguing but smells like geopolitics sneaking into tech. 🤔 Curious how this impacts global AI innovation.

HarryGonzalez
HarryGonzalez July 31, 2025 at 7:35:39 AM EDT

This article is wild! OpenAI calling out DeepSeek like that feels like a tech soap opera. 😄 I wonder if this is just business rivalry or a real security concern. Anyone else think this could spark a bigger AI cold war?

WilliamRamirez
WilliamRamirez July 27, 2025 at 9:19:30 PM EDT

This article is wild! OpenAI calling DeepSeek 'state-controlled' feels like a tech Cold War move. Are they scared of competition or just playing politics? 🤔 Curious to see how this pans out!

RogerSanchez
RogerSanchez April 19, 2025 at 7:28:34 AM EDT

OpenAI가 DeepSeek을 국가 통제라고 라벨링한 건 정말 대담한 행동이야! 마치 벌집에 돌을 던지는 것 같아. 보안 문제는 이해하지만, 중국산이라는 이유만으로 모델을 금지하는 건 좀 과한 것 같아. 앞으로의 정책이 더 세밀하게 고려되기를 바래. 🤔

Back to Top
OR