OpenAI Labels DeepSeek 'State-Controlled,' Urges Ban on 'PRC-Produced' Models

In a recent policy proposal, OpenAI has labeled the Chinese AI lab DeepSeek as "state-subsidized" and "state-controlled," suggesting that the U.S. government should contemplate banning models developed by DeepSeek and similar operations supported by the People's Republic of China (PRC).
This proposal, submitted as part of the Trump administration's "AI Action Plan" initiative, argues that DeepSeek's models, such as its R1 "reasoning" model, pose security risks due to Chinese legal requirements that mandate compliance with government requests for user data. OpenAI recommends banning "PRC-produced" models in countries classified as "Tier 1" under the Biden administration's export rules to mitigate privacy and security concerns, including the risk of intellectual property theft.
It's not clear whether OpenAI's use of "models" includes DeepSeek's API, its open models, or both. Interestingly, DeepSeek's open models don't have built-in mechanisms for the Chinese government to access user data; instead, they are hosted by companies like Microsoft, Perplexity, and Amazon.
OpenAI has previously accused DeepSeek, which gained recognition earlier this year, of extracting knowledge from OpenAI's models in violation of its terms of service. The new claims—that DeepSeek is backed and controlled by the PRC—mark a significant escalation in OpenAI's ongoing dispute with the Chinese lab.
There's no direct evidence linking DeepSeek, a spin-off from the quantitative hedge fund High-Flyer, to the Chinese government. However, the PRC has shown a growing interest in DeepSeek recently, highlighted by a meeting between DeepSeek founder Liang Wenfeng and Chinese leader Xi Jinping a few weeks ago.
Updated 3/15 8:38 p.m. Pacific: Days after this story hit the news, OpenAI spokesperson Liz Bourgeois provided the following clarification:
“We're not pushing for restrictions on individuals using models like DeepSeek. Our proposal focuses on modifying U.S. export rules to enable more countries to access U.S. computing resources, provided their datacenters don't use PRC technology that could pose security risks. This isn't about limiting chip access based on fears they'll be redirected to the PRC. Our aim is to increase compute and AI access for more countries and people.”
OpenAI's own AI-powered deep research tool describes this statement as "equivocal, using deflective and softening language that somewhat contradicts the more assertive position in the original submission."
Related article
US to Sanction Foreign Officials Over Social Media Regulations
US Takes Stand Against Global Digital Content Regulations
The State Department issued a sharp diplomatic rebuke this week targeting European digital governance policies, signaling escalating tensions over control of online platforms. Secretary Marco
Anthropic Resolves Legal Case Over AI-Generated Book Piracy
Anthropic has reached a resolution in a significant copyright dispute with US authors, agreeing to a proposed class action settlement that avoids a potentially costly trial. The agreement, filed in court documents this Tuesday, stems from allegations
Nvidia's AI Hype Meets Reality as 70% Margins Draw Scrutiny Amid Inference Battles
AI Chip Wars Erupt at VB Transform 2025
The battle lines were drawn during a fiery panel discussion at VB Transform 2025, where rising challengers took direct aim at Nvidia's dominant market position. The central question exposed a glaring contradict
Comments (50)
0/200
JuanWhite
August 10, 2025 at 3:00:59 AM EDT
This is wild! OpenAI calling out DeepSeek as 'state-controlled' feels like a sci-fi plot twist. Is this about tech rivalry or real security concerns? 🤔 Curious to see how this plays out in the AI world.
0
SamuelEvans
August 5, 2025 at 11:00:59 PM EDT
This article is wild! Calling DeepSeek 'state-controlled' feels like a stretch—where’s the proof? I get the security concerns, but banning AI models outright seems like overkill. What’s next, a global AI turf war? 🤔
0
ScottJackson
August 5, 2025 at 3:00:59 AM EDT
OpenAI's move to label DeepSeek as 'state-controlled' feels like a strategic jab in the AI race. It's intriguing but smells like geopolitics sneaking into tech. 🤔 Curious how this impacts global AI innovation.
0
HarryGonzalez
July 31, 2025 at 7:35:39 AM EDT
This article is wild! OpenAI calling out DeepSeek like that feels like a tech soap opera. 😄 I wonder if this is just business rivalry or a real security concern. Anyone else think this could spark a bigger AI cold war?
0
WilliamRamirez
July 27, 2025 at 9:19:30 PM EDT
This article is wild! OpenAI calling DeepSeek 'state-controlled' feels like a tech Cold War move. Are they scared of competition or just playing politics? 🤔 Curious to see how this pans out!
0
RogerSanchez
April 19, 2025 at 7:28:34 AM EDT
OpenAI가 DeepSeek을 국가 통제라고 라벨링한 건 정말 대담한 행동이야! 마치 벌집에 돌을 던지는 것 같아. 보안 문제는 이해하지만, 중국산이라는 이유만으로 모델을 금지하는 건 좀 과한 것 같아. 앞으로의 정책이 더 세밀하게 고려되기를 바래. 🤔
0
In a recent policy proposal, OpenAI has labeled the Chinese AI lab DeepSeek as "state-subsidized" and "state-controlled," suggesting that the U.S. government should contemplate banning models developed by DeepSeek and similar operations supported by the People's Republic of China (PRC).
This proposal, submitted as part of the Trump administration's "AI Action Plan" initiative, argues that DeepSeek's models, such as its R1 "reasoning" model, pose security risks due to Chinese legal requirements that mandate compliance with government requests for user data. OpenAI recommends banning "PRC-produced" models in countries classified as "Tier 1" under the Biden administration's export rules to mitigate privacy and security concerns, including the risk of intellectual property theft.
It's not clear whether OpenAI's use of "models" includes DeepSeek's API, its open models, or both. Interestingly, DeepSeek's open models don't have built-in mechanisms for the Chinese government to access user data; instead, they are hosted by companies like Microsoft, Perplexity, and Amazon.
OpenAI has previously accused DeepSeek, which gained recognition earlier this year, of extracting knowledge from OpenAI's models in violation of its terms of service. The new claims—that DeepSeek is backed and controlled by the PRC—mark a significant escalation in OpenAI's ongoing dispute with the Chinese lab.
There's no direct evidence linking DeepSeek, a spin-off from the quantitative hedge fund High-Flyer, to the Chinese government. However, the PRC has shown a growing interest in DeepSeek recently, highlighted by a meeting between DeepSeek founder Liang Wenfeng and Chinese leader Xi Jinping a few weeks ago.
Updated 3/15 8:38 p.m. Pacific: Days after this story hit the news, OpenAI spokesperson Liz Bourgeois provided the following clarification:
“We're not pushing for restrictions on individuals using models like DeepSeek. Our proposal focuses on modifying U.S. export rules to enable more countries to access U.S. computing resources, provided their datacenters don't use PRC technology that could pose security risks. This isn't about limiting chip access based on fears they'll be redirected to the PRC. Our aim is to increase compute and AI access for more countries and people.”
OpenAI's own AI-powered deep research tool describes this statement as "equivocal, using deflective and softening language that somewhat contradicts the more assertive position in the original submission."




This is wild! OpenAI calling out DeepSeek as 'state-controlled' feels like a sci-fi plot twist. Is this about tech rivalry or real security concerns? 🤔 Curious to see how this plays out in the AI world.




This article is wild! Calling DeepSeek 'state-controlled' feels like a stretch—where’s the proof? I get the security concerns, but banning AI models outright seems like overkill. What’s next, a global AI turf war? 🤔




OpenAI's move to label DeepSeek as 'state-controlled' feels like a strategic jab in the AI race. It's intriguing but smells like geopolitics sneaking into tech. 🤔 Curious how this impacts global AI innovation.




This article is wild! OpenAI calling out DeepSeek like that feels like a tech soap opera. 😄 I wonder if this is just business rivalry or a real security concern. Anyone else think this could spark a bigger AI cold war?




This article is wild! OpenAI calling DeepSeek 'state-controlled' feels like a tech Cold War move. Are they scared of competition or just playing politics? 🤔 Curious to see how this pans out!




OpenAI가 DeepSeek을 국가 통제라고 라벨링한 건 정말 대담한 행동이야! 마치 벌집에 돌을 던지는 것 같아. 보안 문제는 이해하지만, 중국산이라는 이유만으로 모델을 금지하는 건 좀 과한 것 같아. 앞으로의 정책이 더 세밀하게 고려되기를 바래. 🤔












