Judge Criticizes AI Entrepreneur for Employing AI-Generated 'Lawyer' in Court

A man's bold move to use an AI-generated avatar in his legal appeal certainly caught the attention of a New York courtroom, though not in the way he might have hoped.
Jerome Dewald, a 74-year-old entrepreneur behind a startup claiming to "revolutionize legal self-representation with AI," faced a stern rebuke during an employment dispute hearing on March 26th. The issue? He failed to disclose to the judges that the person presenting his oral argument was artificially generated. Although the court had given Dewald the green light to submit a video, Justice Sallie Manzanet-Daniels was taken aback when an unfamiliar face, clearly not Dewald, appeared on screen.
"Hold on," Manzanet-Daniels interjected, barely a sentence into the avatar's speech. "Is that counsel for the case?"
"I generated that," Dewald admitted. "It's not a real person."
Dewald explained to *The Register* that the avatar, a "big, beautiful hunk of a guy" named Jim, was one of the stock options from an AI avatar company called Tavus. He submitted the video due to his challenges with prolonged speaking, but the court was unaware that the video was AI-generated.
"It would have been nice to know that when you made your application. You did not tell me that, sir, I don't appreciate being misled," Manzanet-Daniels retorted after Dewald's confession. "You are not going to use this courtroom as a launch for your business."
Recent AI Mishaps in Legal Settings
This incident is part of a growing list of mishaps where AI and legal processes intersect. In 2023, two attorneys and their law firm faced penalties for submitting fictitious legal research generated by ChatGPT. Similarly, the "robot lawyer" company DoNotPay was slapped with a $193,000 settlement by the FTC in February for falsely claiming that its AI legal representation matched the effectiveness of human lawyers.
These cases highlight the importance of transparency and caution when integrating AI into legal proceedings. As technology continues to evolve, it's crucial for users to be upfront about their use of AI tools to maintain the integrity and trust within the judicial system.
Related article
Warner Music acquires AI attribution startup Sureel AI
Warner Music Group (WMG) confirmed on Wednesday that it is acquiring Sureel AI, an artificial intelligence attribution startup. Sureel’s proprietary technology generates “AI DNA” for musical tracks, deconstructing them into constituent elements to tr
Amazon introduces Alexa for Shopping while pushing Rufus to the background
Amazon has launched Alexa for Shopping, merging its Rufus shopping chatbot with Alexa+ across the app, website, and Echo Show devices.The assistant answers product queries, compares items, tracks prices, and supports shopping reminders. It also handl
Microsoft, Azure and AI Tech Combat California Wildfire Risks
Microsoft invests in AI-driven wildfire detection, with Juan Lavista Ferres, CVP and Chief Data Scientist, discussing strategies to mitigate environmental damage.According to NASA, climate change impacts everyone on Earth, manifesting as rising tempe
Related Special Topic Recommendations
Comments (12)
0/500
Wow, this is both fascinating and a bit reckless! The idea of using an AI avatar for legal self-representation sounds like something from a sci-fi movie, but the reality check from the judge was necessary. It highlights a huge gap between technological ambition and practical legal protocol. Are we ready for AI lawyers, or is this just opening a can of ethical worms? 🤔 The entrepreneur's boldness is admirable, but maybe the courtroom isn't the best place for beta testing tech yet. This case will definitely set a precedent!
Esse cara tentou inovar demais hein? 🤣 Usar um 'advogado' de IA no tribunal foi meio que pedir pra levar uma bronca. Ainda bem que o juiz botou limite nessa palhaçada - automação legal tem que respeitar as regras do jogo!
Menuda idea más ridícula 🤦♂️ ¿En serio pensó que un avatar de IA podría sustituir a un abogado real en los tribunales? Esto demuestra lo alejados que están algunos emprendedores de la realidad. La justicia necesita toque humano, no algoritmos generando palabrería legal. ¡Qué vergüenza para este señor!
This AI lawyer stunt is wild! 😲 I get trying to shake things up, but using an AI avatar in court? That’s like sending a robot to do your taxes. Curious if this guy thought it’d actually work or just wanted headlines.
Quel culot de vouloir utiliser un avatar IA en tribunal ! 😅 Franchement, je trouve ça fascinant, mais ça montre aussi les limites de l’IA face à un vrai juge. Peut-être qu’un jour on verra des IA avocats, mais là, c’est un peu trop tôt, non ?

A man's bold move to use an AI-generated avatar in his legal appeal certainly caught the attention of a New York courtroom, though not in the way he might have hoped.
Jerome Dewald, a 74-year-old entrepreneur behind a startup claiming to "revolutionize legal self-representation with AI," faced a stern rebuke during an employment dispute hearing on March 26th. The issue? He failed to disclose to the judges that the person presenting his oral argument was artificially generated. Although the court had given Dewald the green light to submit a video, Justice Sallie Manzanet-Daniels was taken aback when an unfamiliar face, clearly not Dewald, appeared on screen.
"Hold on," Manzanet-Daniels interjected, barely a sentence into the avatar's speech. "Is that counsel for the case?"
"I generated that," Dewald admitted. "It's not a real person."
Dewald explained to *The Register* that the avatar, a "big, beautiful hunk of a guy" named Jim, was one of the stock options from an AI avatar company called Tavus. He submitted the video due to his challenges with prolonged speaking, but the court was unaware that the video was AI-generated.
"It would have been nice to know that when you made your application. You did not tell me that, sir, I don't appreciate being misled," Manzanet-Daniels retorted after Dewald's confession. "You are not going to use this courtroom as a launch for your business."
Recent AI Mishaps in Legal Settings
This incident is part of a growing list of mishaps where AI and legal processes intersect. In 2023, two attorneys and their law firm faced penalties for submitting fictitious legal research generated by ChatGPT. Similarly, the "robot lawyer" company DoNotPay was slapped with a $193,000 settlement by the FTC in February for falsely claiming that its AI legal representation matched the effectiveness of human lawyers.
These cases highlight the importance of transparency and caution when integrating AI into legal proceedings. As technology continues to evolve, it's crucial for users to be upfront about their use of AI tools to maintain the integrity and trust within the judicial system.
Warner Music acquires AI attribution startup Sureel AI
Warner Music Group (WMG) confirmed on Wednesday that it is acquiring Sureel AI, an artificial intelligence attribution startup. Sureel’s proprietary technology generates “AI DNA” for musical tracks, deconstructing them into constituent elements to tr
Microsoft, Azure and AI Tech Combat California Wildfire Risks
Microsoft invests in AI-driven wildfire detection, with Juan Lavista Ferres, CVP and Chief Data Scientist, discussing strategies to mitigate environmental damage.According to NASA, climate change impacts everyone on Earth, manifesting as rising tempe
Wow, this is both fascinating and a bit reckless! The idea of using an AI avatar for legal self-representation sounds like something from a sci-fi movie, but the reality check from the judge was necessary. It highlights a huge gap between technological ambition and practical legal protocol. Are we ready for AI lawyers, or is this just opening a can of ethical worms? 🤔 The entrepreneur's boldness is admirable, but maybe the courtroom isn't the best place for beta testing tech yet. This case will definitely set a precedent!
Esse cara tentou inovar demais hein? 🤣 Usar um 'advogado' de IA no tribunal foi meio que pedir pra levar uma bronca. Ainda bem que o juiz botou limite nessa palhaçada - automação legal tem que respeitar as regras do jogo!
Menuda idea más ridícula 🤦♂️ ¿En serio pensó que un avatar de IA podría sustituir a un abogado real en los tribunales? Esto demuestra lo alejados que están algunos emprendedores de la realidad. La justicia necesita toque humano, no algoritmos generando palabrería legal. ¡Qué vergüenza para este señor!
This AI lawyer stunt is wild! 😲 I get trying to shake things up, but using an AI avatar in court? That’s like sending a robot to do your taxes. Curious if this guy thought it’d actually work or just wanted headlines.
Quel culot de vouloir utiliser un avatar IA en tribunal ! 😅 Franchement, je trouve ça fascinant, mais ça montre aussi les limites de l’IA face à un vrai juge. Peut-être qu’un jour on verra des IA avocats, mais là, c’est un peu trop tôt, non ?





Home






