EU AI Act Draft Offers Lenient Rules for Big Tech AI Models
As the May deadline approaches for finalizing guidelines under the EU AI Act, authorities have released a third and likely final draft of the Code of Practice for general purpose AI (GPAI) providers. Developed since last year, this updated version comes alongside a dedicated platform to improve accessibility. Stakeholders can submit written feedback until March 30, 2025.
Key Aspects of the Draft Code
The EU's risk-based AI framework imposes specific requirements on major AI developers regarding transparency, copyright compliance, and risk management. This Code helps GPAI creators understand obligations and avoid potential sanctions reaching up to 3% of global revenue for violations.
Streamlined Structure
The latest revision presents a more focused framework with refined commitments, incorporating feedback from December's second draft. Additional consultations will further refine the guidelines before final adoption, with experts aiming for enhanced clarity in the definitive version.
The document organizes requirements into several critical areas:
- Core commitments for GPAI providers
- Detailed transparency protocols
- Copyright compliance measures
- Safety and security obligations (specifically for high-risk GPAISR models)
Transparency Measures
The guidance includes sample documentation templates to help downstream implementers access necessary compliance information. However, contentious language around copyright compliance continues to generate debate.
Copyright Concerns
The draft employs qualifiers like "reasonable measures" regarding web crawling practices and copyright protection, potentially allowing significant leeway. Earlier stronger provisions about direct complaint resolution have been softened, now only requiring designated points of contact.
Notably, the text permits GPAI providers to disregard complaints deemed "manifestly unfounded or excessive" - raising concerns about automated copyright detection systems being ignored.
Safety Requirements
The EU AI Act's safety evaluations currently apply only to exceptionally powerful models (exceeding 10^25 FLOPs). Recent feedback has led to further narrowing of some recommended security measures.
Political Context
The draft emerges amid mounting U.S. criticism of European AI regulation. Recent comments from the Trump administration emphasized prioritizing AI development over safeguards, warning against regulatory overreach potentially stifling innovation.
EU policy shifts include shelving the AI Liability Directive and proposing regulatory simplification measures. However, with the AI Act implementation ongoing, balancing robust oversight with industry viability remains challenging.
Industry Perspectives
Prominent GPAI developer Mistral has publicly struggled with certain technical compliance requirements, working closely with regulators to find feasible solutions.
Regulatory Horizon
The European Commission's AI Office is concurrently developing supplementary guidance to clarify GPAI definitions and responsibilities. These forthcoming interpretations may significantly influence the practical implementation of the AI Act.
Related article
Stripe to Acquire OpenRouter as AI Model Routing Gains Momentum
Stripe has agreed to acquire OpenRouter, an AI model-routing platform that gives developers access to hundreds of models through a single interface. The deal adds model selection and routing to Stripe’s existing work around AI usage and token-based b
Former OpenAI Researcher Barrett Zoph Returns to Google to Support Gemini Development
Barret Zoph, who previously abruptly left and joined OpenAI due to a disagreement with Thinking Machines Lab CEO Miriam Mularati, has once again changed employers. Alphabet's Google announced that Zoph will return as Vice President of Research, bring
How Recursive Intelligence Raised $335M at $4B Valuation in 4 Months
The co-founders of startup Ricursive Intelligence seemed destined to be co-founders.Anna Goldie, CEO, and Azalia Mirhoseini, CTO, are so well-known in the AI community that they were among those AI engineers who “got those weird emails from Zuckerber
Related Special Topic Recommendations
Comments (2)
0/500
빅테크 규제가 이렇게 관대할 줄이야... EU AI 법안 초안을 보니 오히려 대기업들이 더 유리해지는 느낌이에요 🤔 GPT-4 같은 모델이 실제로 안전할지 의문이 드네요. 이런 정책이 결국 소규모 AI 스타트업에게는 불리하게 작용하지 않을까 걱정됩니다.
As the May deadline approaches for finalizing guidelines under the EU AI Act, authorities have released a third and likely final draft of the Code of Practice for general purpose AI (GPAI) providers. Developed since last year, this updated version comes alongside a dedicated platform to improve accessibility. Stakeholders can submit written feedback until March 30, 2025.
Key Aspects of the Draft Code
The EU's risk-based AI framework imposes specific requirements on major AI developers regarding transparency, copyright compliance, and risk management. This Code helps GPAI creators understand obligations and avoid potential sanctions reaching up to 3% of global revenue for violations.
Streamlined Structure
The latest revision presents a more focused framework with refined commitments, incorporating feedback from December's second draft. Additional consultations will further refine the guidelines before final adoption, with experts aiming for enhanced clarity in the definitive version.
The document organizes requirements into several critical areas:
- Core commitments for GPAI providers
- Detailed transparency protocols
- Copyright compliance measures
- Safety and security obligations (specifically for high-risk GPAISR models)
Transparency Measures
The guidance includes sample documentation templates to help downstream implementers access necessary compliance information. However, contentious language around copyright compliance continues to generate debate.
Copyright Concerns
The draft employs qualifiers like "reasonable measures" regarding web crawling practices and copyright protection, potentially allowing significant leeway. Earlier stronger provisions about direct complaint resolution have been softened, now only requiring designated points of contact.
Notably, the text permits GPAI providers to disregard complaints deemed "manifestly unfounded or excessive" - raising concerns about automated copyright detection systems being ignored.
Safety Requirements
The EU AI Act's safety evaluations currently apply only to exceptionally powerful models (exceeding 10^25 FLOPs). Recent feedback has led to further narrowing of some recommended security measures.
Political Context
The draft emerges amid mounting U.S. criticism of European AI regulation. Recent comments from the Trump administration emphasized prioritizing AI development over safeguards, warning against regulatory overreach potentially stifling innovation.
EU policy shifts include shelving the AI Liability Directive and proposing regulatory simplification measures. However, with the AI Act implementation ongoing, balancing robust oversight with industry viability remains challenging.
Industry Perspectives
Prominent GPAI developer Mistral has publicly struggled with certain technical compliance requirements, working closely with regulators to find feasible solutions.
Regulatory Horizon
The European Commission's AI Office is concurrently developing supplementary guidance to clarify GPAI definitions and responsibilities. These forthcoming interpretations may significantly influence the practical implementation of the AI Act.
Stripe to Acquire OpenRouter as AI Model Routing Gains Momentum
Stripe has agreed to acquire OpenRouter, an AI model-routing platform that gives developers access to hundreds of models through a single interface. The deal adds model selection and routing to Stripe’s existing work around AI usage and token-based b
Former OpenAI Researcher Barrett Zoph Returns to Google to Support Gemini Development
Barret Zoph, who previously abruptly left and joined OpenAI due to a disagreement with Thinking Machines Lab CEO Miriam Mularati, has once again changed employers. Alphabet's Google announced that Zoph will return as Vice President of Research, bring
How Recursive Intelligence Raised $335M at $4B Valuation in 4 Months
The co-founders of startup Ricursive Intelligence seemed destined to be co-founders.Anna Goldie, CEO, and Azalia Mirhoseini, CTO, are so well-known in the AI community that they were among those AI engineers who “got those weird emails from Zuckerber
빅테크 규제가 이렇게 관대할 줄이야... EU AI 법안 초안을 보니 오히려 대기업들이 더 유리해지는 느낌이에요 🤔 GPT-4 같은 모델이 실제로 안전할지 의문이 드네요. 이런 정책이 결국 소규모 AI 스타트업에게는 불리하게 작용하지 않을까 걱정됩니다.





Home






