Rakuten AI 3.0 Faces Open Source Backlash Over DeepSeek License Removal

The recently unveiled Rakuten AI 3.0 model from Japan's Rakuten Group has ignited public debate. Upon its release, the model faced accusations of violating its original open-source license, drawing sharp criticism from the open-source community.
Rakuten Group promoted the launch as "Japan's largest" AI model. However, technology enthusiasts quickly discovered that the model was actually trained using DeepSeek's DeepSeek-V3 as its foundation. While fine-tuning open-source models is standard industry practice, Rakuten's handling of the situation resulted in several controversies:
Compliance Issues: The initial release version removed the original MIT Open Source License file (LICENSE). According to the license terms, any derivative works must retain the original copyright notice and license statement.
Public Sentiment: Japanese netizens noted that Rakuten utilized significant computing resources supported by government funding yet failed to deliver a fully independent model. This was seen as a letdown for local communities expecting domestically developed innovation.
Following online exposure and widespread discussion, Rakuten moved swiftly to address the issues:
Updated Declaration: Rakuten added a file named NOTICE to the open-source repository, which included the complete original attribution statement for DeepSeek-V3.
Current Compliance: Since the MIT license does not strictly mandate a specific filename for the declaration, Rakuten's corrective action restored legal compliance. Nevertheless, the community continues to criticize the initial approach as "lacking transparency."
While the underlying technical competition rules did not forbid fine-tuning open-source models, the community judged Rakuten's act of "hiding" the source as "insincere." This incident has reignited deeper conversations about how companies, particularly those receiving public subsidies, should balance independent research with the ethical use of open-source achievements.
To date, Rakuten Group has not offered further explanation for the initial decision to remove the license file.
Related article
Stripe to Acquire OpenRouter as AI Model Routing Gains Momentum
Stripe has agreed to acquire OpenRouter, an AI model-routing platform that gives developers access to hundreds of models through a single interface. The deal adds model selection and routing to Stripe’s existing work around AI usage and token-based b
Former OpenAI Researcher Barrett Zoph Returns to Google to Support Gemini Development
Barret Zoph, who previously abruptly left and joined OpenAI due to a disagreement with Thinking Machines Lab CEO Miriam Mularati, has once again changed employers. Alphabet's Google announced that Zoph will return as Vice President of Research, bring
How Recursive Intelligence Raised $335M at $4B Valuation in 4 Months
The co-founders of startup Ricursive Intelligence seemed destined to be co-founders.Anna Goldie, CEO, and Azalia Mirhoseini, CTO, are so well-known in the AI community that they were among those AI engineers who “got those weird emails from Zuckerber
Related Special Topic Recommendations
Comments (0)
0/500

The recently unveiled Rakuten AI 3.0 model from Japan's Rakuten Group has ignited public debate. Upon its release, the model faced accusations of violating its original open-source license, drawing sharp criticism from the open-source community.
Rakuten Group promoted the launch as "Japan's largest" AI model. However, technology enthusiasts quickly discovered that the model was actually trained using DeepSeek's DeepSeek-V3 as its foundation. While fine-tuning open-source models is standard industry practice, Rakuten's handling of the situation resulted in several controversies:
Compliance Issues: The initial release version removed the original MIT Open Source License file (LICENSE). According to the license terms, any derivative works must retain the original copyright notice and license statement.
Public Sentiment: Japanese netizens noted that Rakuten utilized significant computing resources supported by government funding yet failed to deliver a fully independent model. This was seen as a letdown for local communities expecting domestically developed innovation.
Following online exposure and widespread discussion, Rakuten moved swiftly to address the issues:
Updated Declaration: Rakuten added a file named NOTICE to the open-source repository, which included the complete original attribution statement for DeepSeek-V3.
Current Compliance: Since the MIT license does not strictly mandate a specific filename for the declaration, Rakuten's corrective action restored legal compliance. Nevertheless, the community continues to criticize the initial approach as "lacking transparency."
While the underlying technical competition rules did not forbid fine-tuning open-source models, the community judged Rakuten's act of "hiding" the source as "insincere." This incident has reignited deeper conversations about how companies, particularly those receiving public subsidies, should balance independent research with the ethical use of open-source achievements.
To date, Rakuten Group has not offered further explanation for the initial decision to remove the license file.
Stripe to Acquire OpenRouter as AI Model Routing Gains Momentum
Stripe has agreed to acquire OpenRouter, an AI model-routing platform that gives developers access to hundreds of models through a single interface. The deal adds model selection and routing to Stripe’s existing work around AI usage and token-based b
Former OpenAI Researcher Barrett Zoph Returns to Google to Support Gemini Development
Barret Zoph, who previously abruptly left and joined OpenAI due to a disagreement with Thinking Machines Lab CEO Miriam Mularati, has once again changed employers. Alphabet's Google announced that Zoph will return as Vice President of Research, bring
How Recursive Intelligence Raised $335M at $4B Valuation in 4 Months
The co-founders of startup Ricursive Intelligence seemed destined to be co-founders.Anna Goldie, CEO, and Azalia Mirhoseini, CTO, are so well-known in the AI community that they were among those AI engineers who “got those weird emails from Zuckerber





Home






