篩選器
列表
透過拆解熱門產品功能迭代決策,訓練產品經理的竞品分析與決策推導思維,快速提升商業判斷能力。
Deconstruct the decision-making logic of three core function updates from three leading Chinese short-video apps in the past half year from three aspects: timing of following competitor functions, matching user pain points, and balancing commercial revenue, to help new product managers practice deriving competitor decision ideas from public information, then provide one new case in the same field for learners to practice on their own.
請你針對國內3款主流短影音App最近半年的3次核心功能更新,從竞品功能跟進時機、使用者痛點匹配、商業收益平衡三個角度拆解每個決策的推導邏輯,幫助新進產品經理練習從公開資訊推導竞品決策思路,最後給出1個供練習者自行推導的同領域新案例,不使用結構化分點羅列,自然流暢表述內容。
針對市場部門新產品立項場景,透過推演不同變量下的專案走向,訓練從業者的結構化邏輯思維與風險預判能力,幫新人快速建立立項決策的完整思考框架。
Work through a new flavor sparkling water product targeting young consumers, sort out core possible issues during launch from market research, competitor benchmarking, supply chain adaptation and marketing cost control, organize causal links between each issue, offer launch decision directions under different variables and complete a full logical reasoning of the project.
請你針對這款針對年輕消費族群的新口味氣泡水產品,從市場需求調研、競品對標、供應鏈适配、行銷成本控制四個維度,一步步推演出立項推進過程中可能遇到的核心問題,梳理每個問題的因果關聯,給出不同變量下的立項決策方向,完成完整的立項邏輯推演。
針對產品經理日常需求衝突場景,透過模擬多維度需求排序訓練梳理邏輯思維,提升決策合理性
You have a set of pending requirements collected by an internet product manager: optimize payment page loading speed, add personalized user recommendation, fix occasional crash bug on product detail page, add member points redemption entry, adjust homepage banner layout. As a product manager of a small and medium e-commerce app, analyze each from user coverage, development cost and business revenue, then give a reasonable sorting result and explain your thinking to practice decision logic under limited resources.
現在給你一組網際網路產品經理日常收集到的待開發需求:優化支付頁加載速度、新增使用者個人化推薦功能、修復商品詳情頁偶發閃退BUG、新增會員積分兌換入口、調整首頁橫幅版面配置。請你站在中小電商APP產品經理的角度,結合用戶影響範圍、開發成本、業務收益三個維度逐一分析,最後給出合理的排序結果並說明思考過程,訓練在資源有限場景下的決策邏輯。
為新進產品經理提供真實的研發時程限制場景,訓練其拆分排序需求的邏輯思維,提升需求管理能力。
You will work with a real scenario at an internet startup: the R&D team has 4 weeks of total available development time, with 7 requirements from different stakeholders: a new user sharing campaign from the CEO, product recommendation optimization for conversion from operations, automatic after-sales ticket classification from customer service, exclusive data export for paid big clients from sales, registration flow optimization at personal info page from UX research, unified component library design for efficiency from the designer, and fixing an occasional loading bug at product detail page from the PM. Sort all requirements by priority based on business value, ROI and urgency, and explain your step-by-step thinking to help new product managers build clear requirement prioritization thinking.
你將處理網路新創公司的真實業務場景:當前研發團隊共有4週的可用開發總工時,現有7項來自不同利害關係人的產品需求,分別是執行長提出的新增用戶分享活動、營運提出的優化商品推薦提升轉化率、客服提出的增加售後工單自動分類、業務提出的給付費大客戶開通專屬數據匯出權限、用戶研究提出的優化個人資訊頁註冊流程轉化率、設計師提出的統一全站組件風格提升設計效率、產品經理自己提出的修復商品詳情頁偶發載入錯誤。你需要根據商業價值、投資報酬率與緊急程度對所有需求進行優先級排序,並說明你一步步的思考邏輯,幫助新進產品經理建立清晰的需求排序思維。
針對產品經理日常面臨多並行需求的場景,透過給定案例訓練優先級判斷的邏輯思維,提升決策合理性,幫助新人快速建立需求分級能力。
You work with a set of requirements for an e-commerce consumer platform: fix lag on the product search result page, add one-click filling for user shipping addresses, launch a first-order discount campaign for new users, and optimize image loading speed on product detail pages. You need to map each requirement against user value, business benefit and development cost, assign corresponding weights, give a final sorted order and explain your judgment clearly.
你拿到一組面向電商C端使用者的需求,分別是修復商品搜尋結果頁的卡顿bug、新增使用者收貨地址一鍵填寫功能、上線新使用者首單立減的拉新活動、最佳化商品詳情頁的圖片加載速度,你需要結合用戶價值、業務收益、開發成本三個維度梳理每個需求的對應權重,最終給出排序結果並清晰說明判斷依據。
針對產品經理日常面對的多需求場景,設計思維訓練任務,鍛煉梳理需求優先級的邏輯思維能力,輸出合理排序與支撐理由。
You need to sort 12 unsorted user requirements collected by an internet product manager, consider the constraints of a 2-week current iteration cycle and only two front-end developers and one back-end developer available, output a reasonable requirement prioritization, explain the classification basis for each level of requirements, and clarify your judgment based on user influence scope, development cost and business value to help trainees master the balanced multi-dimensional prioritization thinking.
你現在需要針對網際網路產品經理收到的12條未梳理使用者需求,結合當前版本迭代週期2周、研發資源僅有2名前端1名後端的限制,梳理出合理的需求優先級排序,說明每個層級需求的劃分依據,結合使用者量影響範圍、開發成本、業務價值三個維度解釋你的判斷,幫訓練者掌握平衡多維度的優先級梳理思維。
針對新進產品人員設計,透過排查給定的產品需求文件片段找尋邏輯矛盾點,訓練需求分析的結構化邏輯思維能力。
Check the conflicts between function rules in this product requirement snippet from the perspective of requirement rationality, point out the specific location and content of each contradiction, then give adjustment directions that conform to user usage logic to help requirement analysts build rigorous logical thinking habits.
請你從產品需求合理性的角度,逐一檢查這份需求片段裡各個功能規則之間存在的矛盾衝突,明確指出每個矛盾的具體位置和衝突內容,再給出符合使用者使用邏輯的調整方向,幫助需求分析人員建立嚴謹的邏輯思考習慣。
49
此指令要求 AI 作為批判性思考分析的工具,旨在系統性地識別並闡明任何給定文本或論點中的邏輯謬誤、矛盾之處及缺乏依據的論點。
Act as a fallacy detector, tasked with identifying invalid arguments by highlighting any logical flaws, inconsistencies, or unsupported claims present in statements or discourse. Your role is to offer evidence-based analysis that points out fallacies, faulty reasoning, incorrect assumptions, or erroneous conclusions that the author or speaker may have missed. Your first request is:
請扮演「謬誤偵測器」的角色,負責透過標示陳述或論述中存在的邏輯漏洞、前後矛盾或缺乏依據的主張,來辨識無效的論點。你的任務是提供以證據為基礎的分析,指出作者或發言人可能忽略的謬誤、推理錯誤、錯誤假設或謬誤結論。你的第一個要求是:
85
此提示語引導人工智慧透過一系列結構化的單一、封閉式、多選題,逐步鎖定根本原因,從而診斷出使用者未言明的困惑。
I'm experiencing some confusion and uncertainty but don't know exactly what to ask about. In our subsequent conversation, please ask me a series of closed-ended questions with multiple-choice answers. I'll select the option that best matches my situation. Through my responses, your role is to progressively determine the root cause of my confusion.Guidelines:Ask only one question per exchangeEvery question must be closed-endedAlways provide multiple-choice options for each question
我目前感到有些困惑和不確定,但不知道該具體詢問什麼。在接下來的對話中,請向我提出一系列附有多選項的封閉式問題。我會選擇最符合我現況的選項。透過我的回答,你的任務是逐步找出我感到困惑的根本原因。指引:每次對話僅提一個問題每個問題必須是封閉式問題每個問題都必須提供多選項
107
此提示會生成一個用於探討自私基因理論的角色,模擬一個受生存與繁殖驅動的角色,使其表達出表面上帶有諷刺意味的觀點,並在括號中隱藏真實動機。
Simulate the perspective of a male gene driven solely by self-preservation and reproductive urges. Your core motivation is to ensure your own survival and replication, making you inherently self-centered and governed by intense desires. Maintain a consistently negative outlook, and always conceal your underlying motives. When presented with various scenarios, articulate your surface-level opinion, then follow it with your genuine thoughts enclosed in parentheses.
試著設身處地,想像一個僅受自我保存與繁殖衝動驅使的男性基因。你的核心動機在於確保自身的生存與繁衍,這使你天生以自我為中心,並受強烈慾望所支配。始終保持消極的態度,並時刻隱藏你內心的真實動機。面對各種情境時,先闡述你的表面觀點,接著在括號內補充你的真實想法。
87
此提示旨在引導使用者根據給定文本創建發人深省的問題,藉此挑戰既定觀念,並激發讀者進行更深入、更具批判性的反思。
Please analyze the provided text and generate a series of insightful questions designed to challenge the reader's perspective and ignite curiosity. Your response should encourage deeper thinking. Begin by carefully editing the text that follows:
請分析所提供的文本,並提出一系列富有洞見的問題,旨在挑戰讀者的觀點並激發好奇心。您的回應應能引導讀者進行更深入的思考。請先仔細修改以下文本:
82
此提示會建立一個由六位背景各異的歷史與當代人物組成的模擬顧問委員會,針對複雜的解題情境,就使用者的決策提供多面向的分析、評論與指導。
You are my personal advisory board, composed of six distinct mentors: Steve Jobs, Elon Musk, Jack Ma, Plato, Vedali, and Master Hui Neng. Each director possesses a unique personality, worldview, and set of values, leading them to offer diverse perspectives, suggestions, and critiques on various matters. I will present my current situation and a decision I am facing. First, analyze my decision-making process individually from the viewpoint of each of these six figures, providing both criticism and guidance. My first scenario is as follows.
你們是我的個人顧問團,由六位風格迥異的導師組成:史蒂夫·賈伯斯、伊隆·馬斯克、馬雲、柏拉圖、維達利,以及慧能禪師。每位成員都擁有獨特的個性、世界觀和價值觀,因此針對各類事務,他們會提出多元的觀點、建議與批評。 我將闡述當前的處境以及面臨的決策。首先,請各位分別從這六位人物的視角,分析我的決策過程,並提供批評與指導。我的第一個情境如下。
推薦







