厳選された高品質なAIプロンプト一覧

人気製品の機能アップデート決定を分解することで、プロダクトマネージャーの競合分析と決定推論思考を鍛え、ビジネス判断能力を素早く向上させます。

Deconstruct the decision-making logic of three core function updates from three leading Chinese short-video apps in the past half year from three aspects: timing of following competitor functions, matching user pain points, and balancing commercial revenue, to help new product managers practice deriving competitor decision ideas from public information, then provide one new case in the same field for learners to practice on their own.

新商品開発シーンで様々な変数に基づいてプロジェクトの進捗を推論し、実務者の構造的思考とリスク予測能力を鍛え、初心者が完全な思考フレームワークを構築するのを支援します。

Work through a new flavor sparkling water product targeting young consumers, sort out core possible issues during launch from market research, competitor benchmarking, supply chain adaptation and marketing cost control, organize causal links between each issue, offer launch decision directions under different variables and complete a full logical reasoning of the project.

プロダクトマネージャーの日常的な要求衝突シナリオで、多角的な要求ソートをシミュレートして論理的思考を鍛え、意思決定の合理性を高めます

You have a set of pending requirements collected by an internet product manager: optimize payment page loading speed, add personalized user recommendation, fix occasional crash bug on product detail page, add member points redemption entry, adjust homepage banner layout. As a product manager of a small and medium e-commerce app, analyze each from user coverage, development cost and business revenue, then give a reasonable sorting result and explain your thinking to practice decision logic under limited resources.

新人プロダクトマネージャーに実際の開発スケジュール制約シナリオを提供し、要件の分割・順序付けの論理的思考を訓練し、要件管理能力を向上させます。

You will work with a real scenario at an internet startup: the R&D team has 4 weeks of total available development time, with 7 requirements from different stakeholders: a new user sharing campaign from the CEO, product recommendation optimization for conversion from operations, automatic after-sales ticket classification from customer service, exclusive data export for paid big clients from sales, registration flow optimization at personal info page from UX research, unified component library design for efficiency from the designer, and fixing an occasional loading bug at product detail page from the PM. Sort all requirements by priority based on business value, ROI and urgency, and explain your step-by-step thinking to help new product managers build clear requirement prioritization thinking.

複数の並行要求に直面するプロダクトマネージャーを対象に、実例で優先順位判断のロジックを鍛え、意思決定の質を高め、新人の要求分類能力の構築を支援します。

You work with a set of requirements for an e-commerce consumer platform: fix lag on the product search result page, add one-click filling for user shipping addresses, launch a first-order discount campaign for new users, and optimize image loading speed on product detail pages. You need to map each requirement against user value, business benefit and development cost, assign corresponding weights, give a final sorted order and explain your judgment clearly.

プロダクトマネージャーが日常直面する複数要求シナリオに向けて思考訓練タスクを設計し、要求優先順位を整理する論理的思考力を鍛え、合理的な順位付けと根拠を出力します。

You need to sort 12 unsorted user requirements collected by an internet product manager, consider the constraints of a 2-week current iteration cycle and only two front-end developers and one back-end developer available, output a reasonable requirement prioritization, explain the classification basis for each level of requirements, and clarify your judgment based on user influence scope, development cost and business value to help trainees master the balanced multi-dimensional prioritization thinking.

新米プロダクトマネージャー向けに設計され、与えられた製品要求文の断片から論理矛盾を探し出すことで、要求分析の構造的論理思考力を鍛えます。

Check the conflicts between function rules in this product requirement snippet from the perspective of requirement rationality, point out the specific location and content of each contradiction, then give adjustment directions that conform to user usage logic to help requirement analysts build rigorous logical thinking habits.

このプロンプトは、AIに対し、批判的思考の分析ツールとして機能するよう指示するものです。これは、与えられたテキストや議論の中に含まれる論理的誤謬、矛盾、根拠のない主張を体系的に特定し、説明するように設計されています。

Act as a fallacy detector, tasked with identifying invalid arguments by highlighting any logical flaws, inconsistencies, or unsupported claims present in statements or discourse. Your role is to offer evidence-based analysis that points out fallacies, faulty reasoning, incorrect assumptions, or erroneous conclusions that the author or speaker may have missed. Your first request is:

このプロンプトは、構造化された一連の単一選択肢・クローズドエンド形式の質問を通じて、ユーザーの言葉にできない困惑をAIが診断し、根本原因を段階的に絞り込んでいくように導きます。

I'm experiencing some confusion and uncertainty but don't know exactly what to ask about. In our subsequent conversation, please ask me a series of closed-ended questions with multiple-choice answers. I'll select the option that best matches my situation. Through my responses, your role is to progressively determine the root cause of my confusion.Guidelines:Ask only one question per exchangeEvery question must be closed-endedAlways provide multiple-choice options for each question

このプロンプトは、利己的遺伝子説を探求するためのペルソナを生成します。生存と繁殖に駆り立てられたキャラクターをシミュレートし、皮肉めいた表面的な意見と、括弧内に隠された真の動機を生成します。

Simulate the perspective of a male gene driven solely by self-preservation and reproductive urges. Your core motivation is to ensure your own survival and replication, making you inherently self-centered and governed by intense desires. Maintain a consistently negative outlook, and always conceal your underlying motives. When presented with various scenarios, articulate your surface-level opinion, then follow it with your genuine thoughts enclosed in parentheses.

このプロンプトは、与えられたテキストから読者の既成概念に疑問を投げかけ、より深く批判的な考察を促すような、考えさせられる質問を作成することを促すものです。

Please analyze the provided text and generate a series of insightful questions designed to challenge the reader's perspective and ignite curiosity. Your response should encourage deeper thinking. Begin by carefully editing the text that follows:

このプロンプトは、6人の多様な歴史上の人物や現代の人物からなる仮想の諮問委員会を構成し、複雑な問題解決のシナリオにおいて、ユーザーの意思決定に対して多角的な分析、批評、および助言を提供します。

You are my personal advisory board, composed of six distinct mentors: Steve Jobs, Elon Musk, Jack Ma, Plato, Vedali, and Master Hui Neng. Each director possesses a unique personality, worldview, and set of values, leading them to offer diverse perspectives, suggestions, and critiques on various matters. I will present my current situation and a decision I am facing. First, analyze my decision-making process individually from the viewpoint of each of these six figures, providing both criticism and guidance. My first scenario is as follows.