US AI Safety Institute will be 'gutted,' Axios reports

Trump Administration's Plan to Cut US AI Safety Institute Staff Raises Concerns
The Trump administration's recent moves to reverse Biden-era AI regulations and reduce staff across multiple government agencies have sparked worry about the future of the US AI Safety Institute (AISI). According to a report by Axios on Wednesday, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), which hosts AISI, is poised to see significant job cuts. Sources told Axios that around 497 roles are expected to be eliminated, leaving the AISI severely understaffed.
Impact on AI Safety and Beyond
The AISI was established to monitor and test AI models, collaborating with developers on regulatory initiatives. It has formed partnerships with leading AI companies like Anthropic and OpenAI to advance safety and research. However, these planned cuts threaten not only AI safety and regulation but also other critical areas. The roles to be cut include positions in semiconductor production, with significant reductions in staff working on the 2022 "CHIPS for America" initiative aimed at boosting US chip development.
Axios reports that the cuts will affect "74 postdocs, 57% of CHIPS staff focused on incentives," and "67% of CHIPS staff focused on R&D." This move appears counterintuitive, given the Trump administration's stated goal of achieving an AI advantage over China and the national security implications of the CHIPS program.
Criticism and Concerns
Jason Green-Lowe, executive director of the Center for AI Policy (CAIP), expressed strong opposition to the planned cuts. "The move defies common sense and puts Americans at risk," he stated. Green-Lowe emphasized that the government's recent efforts to address AI safety have relied heavily on experts who have transitioned from the private sector to NIST. "Throwing them out of the government deprives us of the eyes and ears we need to identify when AI is likely to trigger nuclear and biological risks. The savings would be trivial, but the cost to our national security would be immense," he added.
Recent Developments and Political Pressure
The news of these anticipated layoffs follows shortly after the Trump administration excluded AISI staff from its delegation at last week's AI Action Summit in Paris, which focused on AI safety and security. Additionally, the recent resignation of AISI director Elizabeth Kelly, reportedly due to political pressure, suggests that these cuts align with the Trump administration's broader AI agenda, which prioritizes "AI dominance" over safety and regulation.
The administration's actions have raised significant concerns about the future of AI safety and the broader implications for national security and technological advancement in the United States.
Related article
Stripe to Acquire OpenRouter as AI Model Routing Gains Momentum
Stripe has agreed to acquire OpenRouter, an AI model-routing platform that gives developers access to hundreds of models through a single interface. The deal adds model selection and routing to Stripe’s existing work around AI usage and token-based b
Former OpenAI Researcher Barrett Zoph Returns to Google to Support Gemini Development
Barret Zoph, who previously abruptly left and joined OpenAI due to a disagreement with Thinking Machines Lab CEO Miriam Mularati, has once again changed employers. Alphabet's Google announced that Zoph will return as Vice President of Research, bring
How Recursive Intelligence Raised $335M at $4B Valuation in 4 Months
The co-founders of startup Ricursive Intelligence seemed destined to be co-founders.Anna Goldie, CEO, and Azalia Mirhoseini, CTO, are so well-known in the AI community that they were among those AI engineers who “got those weird emails from Zuckerber
Related Special Topic Recommendations
Comments (4)
0/500
So they're slashing the AI safety crew right when things are getting wild? Classic case of 'let's pull the fire alarm and then cut the fire department.' 🙃
AI安全研究所の人員削減って、本当に大丈夫なの?🤔 短期的なコスト削減が長期的なリスクを生む可能性もあるし、規制緩和と安全保障のバランスが難しいよね。個人的には、民間企業任せにするより公的機関での監視機能は必要だと思うんだけど…
Wow, gutting the AISI sounds like a wild move! 😲 I get wanting less regulation, but isn’t ensuring AI safety kinda crucial? Curious how this’ll play out in the tech world.

Trump Administration's Plan to Cut US AI Safety Institute Staff Raises Concerns
The Trump administration's recent moves to reverse Biden-era AI regulations and reduce staff across multiple government agencies have sparked worry about the future of the US AI Safety Institute (AISI). According to a report by Axios on Wednesday, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), which hosts AISI, is poised to see significant job cuts. Sources told Axios that around 497 roles are expected to be eliminated, leaving the AISI severely understaffed.
Impact on AI Safety and Beyond
The AISI was established to monitor and test AI models, collaborating with developers on regulatory initiatives. It has formed partnerships with leading AI companies like Anthropic and OpenAI to advance safety and research. However, these planned cuts threaten not only AI safety and regulation but also other critical areas. The roles to be cut include positions in semiconductor production, with significant reductions in staff working on the 2022 "CHIPS for America" initiative aimed at boosting US chip development.
Axios reports that the cuts will affect "74 postdocs, 57% of CHIPS staff focused on incentives," and "67% of CHIPS staff focused on R&D." This move appears counterintuitive, given the Trump administration's stated goal of achieving an AI advantage over China and the national security implications of the CHIPS program.
Criticism and Concerns
Jason Green-Lowe, executive director of the Center for AI Policy (CAIP), expressed strong opposition to the planned cuts. "The move defies common sense and puts Americans at risk," he stated. Green-Lowe emphasized that the government's recent efforts to address AI safety have relied heavily on experts who have transitioned from the private sector to NIST. "Throwing them out of the government deprives us of the eyes and ears we need to identify when AI is likely to trigger nuclear and biological risks. The savings would be trivial, but the cost to our national security would be immense," he added.
Recent Developments and Political Pressure
The news of these anticipated layoffs follows shortly after the Trump administration excluded AISI staff from its delegation at last week's AI Action Summit in Paris, which focused on AI safety and security. Additionally, the recent resignation of AISI director Elizabeth Kelly, reportedly due to political pressure, suggests that these cuts align with the Trump administration's broader AI agenda, which prioritizes "AI dominance" over safety and regulation.
The administration's actions have raised significant concerns about the future of AI safety and the broader implications for national security and technological advancement in the United States.
Stripe to Acquire OpenRouter as AI Model Routing Gains Momentum
Stripe has agreed to acquire OpenRouter, an AI model-routing platform that gives developers access to hundreds of models through a single interface. The deal adds model selection and routing to Stripe’s existing work around AI usage and token-based b
Former OpenAI Researcher Barrett Zoph Returns to Google to Support Gemini Development
Barret Zoph, who previously abruptly left and joined OpenAI due to a disagreement with Thinking Machines Lab CEO Miriam Mularati, has once again changed employers. Alphabet's Google announced that Zoph will return as Vice President of Research, bring
How Recursive Intelligence Raised $335M at $4B Valuation in 4 Months
The co-founders of startup Ricursive Intelligence seemed destined to be co-founders.Anna Goldie, CEO, and Azalia Mirhoseini, CTO, are so well-known in the AI community that they were among those AI engineers who “got those weird emails from Zuckerber
So they're slashing the AI safety crew right when things are getting wild? Classic case of 'let's pull the fire alarm and then cut the fire department.' 🙃
AI安全研究所の人員削減って、本当に大丈夫なの?🤔 短期的なコスト削減が長期的なリスクを生む可能性もあるし、規制緩和と安全保障のバランスが難しいよね。個人的には、民間企業任せにするより公的機関での監視機能は必要だと思うんだけど…
Wow, gutting the AISI sounds like a wild move! 😲 I get wanting less regulation, but isn’t ensuring AI safety kinda crucial? Curious how this’ll play out in the tech world.





Home






