司法部提議Google Divest Chrome,允許AI投資

根據周五的法庭文件,美國司法部堅持其槍支,仍要求Google出售其網絡瀏覽器Chrome。這不是一首新的曲調 - 司法部去年喬·拜登(Joe Biden)擔任總統時浮出水面的想法,即使在白宮第二屆特朗普政府中,他們似乎也沒有退縮。但是,他們在Google的AI Ventures上有所減輕,不再堅持認為這位技術巨頭在像Anthropic這樣的公司中投入了大量投資。 DOJ在Omeed Assefi簽署的一份申請中說:“ Google的非法滑稽動作已經變成了經濟巨頭,它使市場陷入困境,以確保它總是脫穎而出。” (只是一個領先者,特朗普領導司法部的反托拉斯分部的選擇仍在等待綠燈。)這就是為什麼司法部表示,它使其原始計劃的“核心組成部分”完好無損,例如擺脫Chrome並停止與合作夥伴搜索相關的付款。當涉及AI時,司法部已經減輕了立場。他們不再推動Google不再拋棄其AI投資,但是只要注意未來的舉動,就會很酷。關於Android?他們沒有立即強迫Google出售它,而是根據市場的塑造方式將這一呼籲下線留給了球場。在司法部和38名州檢察長以反托拉斯訴訟局限於手套之後,這一最新舉動是在領導的法官阿米特·P·梅塔(Amit P. Mehta)召集了Google扮演骯髒之處,以保持其在線搜索的壟斷。 Google並沒有把這個躺下來 - 他們正在準備提起梅塔的裁決,但拋出了另一種計劃,承諾為他們的伴侶提供更多的擺動空間。 Google發言人告訴路透社,司法部的“超級建議遠遠超出了法院的決定,並將為美國消費者,經濟和國家安全造成事情。”梅塔(Mehta)法官打算聽取雙方的論點。
相關文章
Imagen 4:谷歌最新AI圖像生成器
Google近日發表最新圖像生成AI模型「Imagen 4」,宣稱將為用戶帶來比前代Imagen 3更出色的視覺體驗。本週稍早在Google I/O 2025大會亮相的這款新模型,被譽為在畫質與多樣性方面取得重大突破。Google表示,Imagen 4特別擅長處理織物質感、水珠反光與動物毛髮等精細紋理,同時能輕鬆駕馭寫實與抽象風格。其輸出解析度最高可達2K,
谷歌Gemini代碼助手強化AI編程代理功能
Google旗下AI程式開發助手Gemini Code Assist近期推出全新「代理模式」功能,目前開放預覽體驗。在最新Cloud Next大會上,Google展示這些AI代理如何突破性處理複雜編程任務——從Google文件規格書直接生成完整應用程式,或輕鬆實現跨語言程式碼轉換。更令人驚豔的是,開發者現可在Android Studio等整合開發環境中直接啟
谷歌的人工智慧未來基金可能需要謹慎行事
Google 的新 AI 投資計劃:監管審查下的戰略轉變Google 最近宣布設立 AI 未來基金(AI Futures Fund),這標誌著這家科技巨頭在其塑造人工智慧未來的征程中邁出了大膽的一步。該計劃旨在為初創公司提供急需的資金、早期接觸仍在開發中的尖端人工智慧模型,以及來自 Google 內部專家的指導。儘管這不是 Google 第一次涉足初創企業生
評論 (30)
0/200
ThomasYoung
2025-04-11 08:00:00
I'm kinda torn about this whole Google Chrome divestiture thing. On one hand, it might shake things up in the browser market, but on the other, it feels like the DOJ is just picking on Google. Maybe they should focus on bigger fish? Anyway, curious to see how it plays out!
0
ScottJackson
2025-04-10 08:00:00
Me parece un poco exagerado que el Departamento de Justicia quiera que Google venda Chrome. ¿No hay otros problemas más grandes en los que enfocarse? Aunque, si esto lleva a más competencia en los navegadores, podría ser interesante. ¡A ver qué pasa!
0
ThomasAllen
2025-04-11 08:00:00
GoogleがChromeを売却しなければならないというDOJの提案について、賛否両論があります。ブラウザ市場に新たな競争が生まれるかもしれませんが、Googleに厳しすぎる気もします。どうなるか楽しみですね!
0
JamesLopez
2025-04-10 08:00:00
A ideia do DOJ de fazer o Google vender o Chrome é meio controversa. Pode ser bom para o mercado de navegadores, mas será que não estão sendo muito duros com o Google? Vamos ver no que dá!
0
MatthewNelson
2025-04-10 08:00:00
Tôi thấy việc Bộ Tư pháp yêu cầu Google bán Chrome hơi quá đà. Có thể sẽ tạo ra sự cạnh tranh mới trong thị trường trình duyệt, nhưng họ có đang quá khắt khe với Google không? Chờ xem kết quả thế nào!
0
MarkSmith
2025-04-11 08:00:00
The DOJ's move against Google's Chrome is wild! I mean, sure, competition is good, but forcing them to sell Chrome? That's a bit much. And letting them invest in AI instead? Sounds like they're just trying to shift the tech landscape. Not sure how I feel about it, but it's definitely going to shake things up!
0



I'm kinda torn about this whole Google Chrome divestiture thing. On one hand, it might shake things up in the browser market, but on the other, it feels like the DOJ is just picking on Google. Maybe they should focus on bigger fish? Anyway, curious to see how it plays out!




Me parece un poco exagerado que el Departamento de Justicia quiera que Google venda Chrome. ¿No hay otros problemas más grandes en los que enfocarse? Aunque, si esto lleva a más competencia en los navegadores, podría ser interesante. ¡A ver qué pasa!




GoogleがChromeを売却しなければならないというDOJの提案について、賛否両論があります。ブラウザ市場に新たな競争が生まれるかもしれませんが、Googleに厳しすぎる気もします。どうなるか楽しみですね!




A ideia do DOJ de fazer o Google vender o Chrome é meio controversa. Pode ser bom para o mercado de navegadores, mas será que não estão sendo muito duros com o Google? Vamos ver no que dá!




Tôi thấy việc Bộ Tư pháp yêu cầu Google bán Chrome hơi quá đà. Có thể sẽ tạo ra sự cạnh tranh mới trong thị trường trình duyệt, nhưng họ có đang quá khắt khe với Google không? Chờ xem kết quả thế nào!




The DOJ's move against Google's Chrome is wild! I mean, sure, competition is good, but forcing them to sell Chrome? That's a bit much. And letting them invest in AI instead? Sounds like they're just trying to shift the tech landscape. Not sure how I feel about it, but it's definitely going to shake things up!












