o4-mini-high VS Qwen3-32B (Thinking)
| Model Name | Affiliated organization | Release time | Model parameter quantity | Comprehensive score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| o4-mini-high | OpenAI | April 17, 2025 | N/A | 7.2 |
| Qwen3-32B (Thinking) | Alibaba | April 29, 2025 | 32B | 7.1 |
Comprehensive score
Language dialogue
Knowledge reserve
Reasoning association
Mathematical calculation
Code writing
Command following
Swipe left and right to view more
Brief Comparison of o4-mini-high VS Qwen3-32B (Thinking) AI Models
Comprehensive Capability Comparison
o4-mini-high demonstrates greater robustness, whereas Qwen3-32B (Thinking) has evident weaknesses in handling long task chains and contextual interactions.
Language Understanding Comparison
Qwen3-32B (Thinking) is more consistent; o4-mini-high has weaknesses in logic and semantics.
Mathematical Reasoning Comparison
o4-mini-high is marginally better in basic reasoning tasks, showing more stability and accuracy.
