Bailing-Lite-1116 VS Claude 3.7 Sonnet (Thinking)
| Model Name | Affiliated organization | Release time | Model parameter quantity | Comprehensive score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bailing-Lite-1116 | Ant Group | November 16, 2024 | N/A | 4.7 |
| Claude 3.7 Sonnet (Thinking) | Anthropic | February 19, 2025 | N/A | 6.1 |
Comprehensive score
Language dialogue
Knowledge reserve
Reasoning association
Mathematical calculation
Code writing
Command following
Swipe left and right to view more
Brief Comparison of Bailing-Lite-1116 VS Claude 3.7 Sonnet (Thinking) AI Models
Comprehensive Capability Comparison
Claude 3.7 Sonnet (Thinking) still retains some practical value, whereas Bailing-Lite-1116 lacks basic execution capability and is limited in applicability.
Language Understanding Comparison
Claude 3.7 Sonnet (Thinking) is slightly more reliable in basic expressions; Bailing-Lite-1116 lacks semantic consistency.
Mathematical Reasoning Comparison
Both models are inadequate in reasoning and computation, frequently failing and unable to handle practical analytical tasks.
