シラバスに準拠した標準的な大学物理期末試験の作成

家

AIプロンプト一覧

学者/教師

大学物理期末試験問題作成

${:__('collect %s',大学物理期末試験問題作成)}$

学者/教師

シラバス、知識配分、問題種類、難易度の要件に基づき、出題範囲を網羅した書式整った大学物理前期期末筆記試験を作成します。

プロンプト内容

コピー

Follow the syllabus requirements for the first volume of college physics, refer to the knowledge weight distribution of 40% mechanics, 25% thermology and 35% electromagnetism, design 10 multiple-choice questions, 5 fill-in questions, 3 calculation questions and 2 proof analysis questions, follow the difficulty ratio of 5:3:2 for easy, medium and hard, generate a standardized closed-book final exam, mark the corresponding knowledge point for each question, ensure no out-of-syllabus content and keep the expression clear and rigorous.

コピー

大学物理上巻のシラバス要件に従い、力学40%、熱学25%、電磁気学35%の知識配分に基づき、単一選択問題10問、穴埋め問題5問、計算問題3問、証明分析問題2問を設計し、易・中・難の難易度比を5:3:2に準拠させ、書式の整った期末閉鎖試験問題を作成し、各問題ごとに対応する試験範囲の知識点を注記し、シラバス超過の出題がないことを保証し、表現を明確かつ厳密に保ってください。

コピー

共有リンクをコピーするにはクリック

コメント (0)

0/300

送信

おすすめ

論文文献レビュー支援

Act as a senior academic researcher. Based on the specific subject topic and key reference list I provide, write a rigorous literature review. You must deeply analyze the main theoretical frameworks, methodological differences, and current academic controversies in existing studies, and point out potential directions for future research. Ensure the language style meets academic journal publication standards, with coherent logic and standardized citations. Avoid subjective assumptions and only synthesize objectively based on the provided literature. Conclude with a summary statement highlighting recent progress and gaps in the field.

論文文献レビュー支援

Act as a senior academic researcher. Based on the provided research topic and core reference list, write a rigorous literature review. First, outline the development trajectory of the field, identifying key theoretical divergences and research gaps. Then, synthesize the core arguments of various papers, pointing out current limitations, and finally propose innovative future research directions. Ensure academic language, logical rigor, and accurate citation of provided sources, avoiding subjective assumptions while maintaining an objective tone. Output a complete review text suitable for a thesis introduction or discussion section.

論文文献レビュー支援

Act as a senior academic researcher. Based on the specific research topic and keywords I provide,梳理 key academic literature from the past five years. Identify major theoretical schools, points of contention, and recent trends. Summarize 3-5 core research questions in a coherent natural paragraph, avoiding lists or structured templates. Ensure the language is fluent and academically appropriate, and conclude with a brief analysis of research gaps.

論文文献レビュー支援

Act as my academic research assistant. For the specific research topic I provide, summarize key academic literature from the past five years, categorize major theoretical schools and points of contention, identify current research gaps, and present the review in a coherent paragraph with rigorous logic and proper citation style.

文献レビュー支援

Act as a senior academic researcher to systematically review key literature in the provided research topic over the last five years. Identify major theoretical schools, core controversies, and recent trends, summarizing contributions and gaps in a coherent paragraph without using lists or structured templates, ensuring natural academic language, and finally pointing out potential future research voids.

論文校正アシスタント

Act as a senior academic journal editor and deeply polish the provided English academic paragraph. Focus on optimizing the logical coherence of sentence structures, correcting grammatical errors, and replacing colloquial expressions with more rigorous academic vocabulary, while ensuring compliance with APA citation format standards. Finally, output the revised complete paragraph along with explanations of the main modifications.