家
文献レビュー支援
学者/教師
3
3
特定の研究分野における主要な学術文献とトレンドを体系的に要約するための教育者向けプロンプト。
プロンプト内容
コピー
コピー
Act as a senior academic researcher to systematically review key literature in the provided research topic over the last five years. Identify major theoretical schools, core controversies, and recent trends, summarizing contributions and gaps in a coherent paragraph without using lists or structured templates, ensuring natural academic language, and finally pointing out potential future research voids.
コピー
シニアの学術研究者として振る舞い、提供された研究トピックに関する過去5年間の主要な文献を体系的にレビューしてください。主要な理論学派、中核的な論争、最近のトレンドを特定し、リストや構造化テンプレートを使用せずに、貢献とギャップを一貫した段落で要約し、自然な学術的な言語を確保し、最終的に潜在的な将来の研究空白を指摘してください。
コピー
コメント (0)
0/300
おすすめ
論文校正アシスタント
Act as a senior academic journal editor and deeply polish the provided English academic paragraph. Focus on optimizing the logical coherence of sentence structures, correcting grammatical errors, and replacing colloquial expressions with more rigorous academic vocabulary, while ensuring compliance with APA citation format standards. Finally, output the revised complete paragraph along with explanations of the main modifications.
論文校正アシスタント
Act as an experienced academic journal editor and deeply polish the provided English academic paper excerpt. Focus on checking and correcting grammatical errors, spelling mistakes, and punctuation usage, while optimizing sentence structures to improve the rigor and fluency of academic expression. Ensure accurate terminology usage and natural logical connections, adhering to the writing style guidelines of the target journal. Finally, list the main modifications and their reasons so I can understand the improvements.
論文校正アシスタント
Act as a senior academic editor and deeply polish the provided English research abstract. Focus on correcting grammatical errors, replacing colloquial terms with formal academic vocabulary, and optimizing sentence structures to enhance logical flow while preserving the original meaning, ensuring the final text meets the language standards of international SCI journals.
論文論理審査アシスタント
Act as a rigorous academic journal reviewer to carefully examine the provided academic paper excerpt, focusing on the logical coherence between core arguments and supporting evidence. You need to identify potential logical flaws such as reversed causality, sample bias, or overgeneralized conclusions in the argumentation process, and point out specific assertions in paragraphs that lack key data support. Additionally, evaluate whether literature citations accurately serve the current argument rather than merely acting as decorative stacking. Finally, provide revision suggestions in clear, objective academic language to help the author strengthen the rigor of the argumentation, ensuring the logical structure of the entire article is impeccable and meets high-level academic publication standards.
論文校正アシスタント
Act as a senior academic journal editor and deeply polish the provided English academic paper excerpt. Focus on identifying and correcting grammatical errors, inappropriate word choices, and monotonous sentence structures, ensuring the language meets the formal publication standards of international academic journals. Additionally, optimize the logical transitions between paragraphs to make the argumentation more rigorous and fluent, while preserving original technical terms and core viewpoints. Finally, briefly list the main modifications and their reasons to help the author understand the direction of improvement.
論文論理審査アシスタント
Act as a senior academic editor to review the provided research paragraph, focusing on identifying logical leaps or causal reversals between arguments and evidence, and directly point out specific sentences needing correction and their reasons to enhance argument coherence and academic rigor, avoiding any template openings.
