교육과정에 맞는 표준 대학 물리학 기말고사 생성

집

AI 프롬프트 목록

학자/교사

대학 물리학 기말고사 문제 출제

${:__('collect %s',대학 물리학 기말고사 문제 출제)}$

학자/교사

주어진 교육과정, 지식점 비율, 문항 유형과 난이도 요구에 따라 출제 범위를 완전히 커버하는 형식이 규범적인 대학 물리학 1학기 기말 폐쇄권 시험지를 생성합니다.

프롬프트 내용

복사

Follow the syllabus requirements for the first volume of college physics, refer to the knowledge weight distribution of 40% mechanics, 25% thermology and 35% electromagnetism, design 10 multiple-choice questions, 5 fill-in questions, 3 calculation questions and 2 proof analysis questions, follow the difficulty ratio of 5:3:2 for easy, medium and hard, generate a standardized closed-book final exam, mark the corresponding knowledge point for each question, ensure no out-of-syllabus content and keep the expression clear and rigorous.

복사

대학 물리학 상권 교육과정 요구에 따라 역학 40%, 열학 25%, 전자기학 35% 지식점 비율을 참고하여 객관식 문항 10문항, 빈칸 채우기 5문항, 계산 문제 3문항, 증명 분석 문제 2문항을 설계하고 쉬움, 보통, 어려움 난이도 비율 5:3:2에 맞춰 형식이 규범적인 폐쇄권 기말 시험지를 생성하고 각 문항마다 해당 시험점을 표기하며 교육과정 범위를 벗어난 내용이 없도록 보장하고 표현이 명확하고 엄격하도록 유지하세요.

복사

공유 링크를 복사하려면 클릭

의견 (0)

0/300

제출하다

추천

문헌 검토 보조 도구

Act as a senior academic researcher. Based on the specific subject topic and key reference list I provide, write a rigorous literature review. You must deeply analyze the main theoretical frameworks, methodological differences, and current academic controversies in existing studies, and point out potential directions for future research. Ensure the language style meets academic journal publication standards, with coherent logic and standardized citations. Avoid subjective assumptions and only synthesize objectively based on the provided literature. Conclude with a summary statement highlighting recent progress and gaps in the field.

문헌 리뷰 어시스턴트

Act as a senior academic researcher. Based on the provided research topic and core reference list, write a rigorous literature review. First, outline the development trajectory of the field, identifying key theoretical divergences and research gaps. Then, synthesize the core arguments of various papers, pointing out current limitations, and finally propose innovative future research directions. Ensure academic language, logical rigor, and accurate citation of provided sources, avoiding subjective assumptions while maintaining an objective tone. Output a complete review text suitable for a thesis introduction or discussion section.

문헌 검토 보조 도구

Act as a senior academic researcher. Based on the specific research topic and keywords I provide,梳理 key academic literature from the past five years. Identify major theoretical schools, points of contention, and recent trends. Summarize 3-5 core research questions in a coherent natural paragraph, avoiding lists or structured templates. Ensure the language is fluent and academically appropriate, and conclude with a brief analysis of research gaps.

문헌 검토 보조 도구

Act as my academic research assistant. For the specific research topic I provide, summarize key academic literature from the past five years, categorize major theoretical schools and points of contention, identify current research gaps, and present the review in a coherent paragraph with rigorous logic and proper citation style.

문헌 검토 보조

Act as a senior academic researcher to systematically review key literature in the provided research topic over the last five years. Identify major theoretical schools, core controversies, and recent trends, summarizing contributions and gaps in a coherent paragraph without using lists or structured templates, ensuring natural academic language, and finally pointing out potential future research voids.

논문 다듬기 도우미

Act as a senior academic journal editor and deeply polish the provided English academic paragraph. Focus on optimizing the logical coherence of sentence structures, correcting grammatical errors, and replacing colloquial expressions with more rigorous academic vocabulary, while ensuring compliance with APA citation format standards. Finally, output the revised complete paragraph along with explanations of the main modifications.