Генерация стандартного финального теста по физике по программе

Дом

Список AI-промптов

Академик/Преподаватель

Составление финального теста по физике вуза

${:__('collect %s',Составление финального теста по физике вуза)}$

Академик/Преподаватель

Создаёт стандартизированный закрытый финальный тест по физике первого семестра вуза по заданной программе, доле тем, типам заданий и сложности.

Содержание промпта

Копировать

Follow the syllabus requirements for the first volume of college physics, refer to the knowledge weight distribution of 40% mechanics, 25% thermology and 35% electromagnetism, design 10 multiple-choice questions, 5 fill-in questions, 3 calculation questions and 2 proof analysis questions, follow the difficulty ratio of 5:3:2 for easy, medium and hard, generate a standardized closed-book final exam, mark the corresponding knowledge point for each question, ensure no out-of-syllabus content and keep the expression clear and rigorous.

Копировать

Следуйте требованиям программы первого тома физики для вузов, опирайтесь на распределение долей тем: 40% механика, 25% термология, 35% электромагнетизм. Разработайте 10 заданий с выбором ответа, 5 заданий с заполнением пропусков, 3 вычислительных задания и 2 задания на доказательство и анализ, придерживайтесь соотношения сложности 5:3:2 (лёгкие, средние, сложные), создайте стандартизированный закрытый финальный тест, отметьте соответствующую тему для каждого задания, убедитесь в отсутствии выходящих за программу тем и сохраняйте изложение ясным и строгим.

Копировать

Поделиться Нажмите, чтобы скопировать ссылку

Комментарии (0)

0/300

Представлять на рассмотрение

Рекомендация

Помощник обзора литературы

Act as a senior academic researcher. Based on the specific subject topic and key reference list I provide, write a rigorous literature review. You must deeply analyze the main theoretical frameworks, methodological differences, and current academic controversies in existing studies, and point out potential directions for future research. Ensure the language style meets academic journal publication standards, with coherent logic and standardized citations. Avoid subjective assumptions and only synthesize objectively based on the provided literature. Conclude with a summary statement highlighting recent progress and gaps in the field.

Помощник обзора литературы

Act as a senior academic researcher. Based on the provided research topic and core reference list, write a rigorous literature review. First, outline the development trajectory of the field, identifying key theoretical divergences and research gaps. Then, synthesize the core arguments of various papers, pointing out current limitations, and finally propose innovative future research directions. Ensure academic language, logical rigor, and accurate citation of provided sources, avoiding subjective assumptions while maintaining an objective tone. Output a complete review text suitable for a thesis introduction or discussion section.

Помощник обзора литературы

Act as a senior academic researcher. Based on the specific research topic and keywords I provide,梳理 key academic literature from the past five years. Identify major theoretical schools, points of contention, and recent trends. Summarize 3-5 core research questions in a coherent natural paragraph, avoiding lists or structured templates. Ensure the language is fluent and academically appropriate, and conclude with a brief analysis of research gaps.

Ассистент обзора литературы

Act as my academic research assistant. For the specific research topic I provide, summarize key academic literature from the past five years, categorize major theoretical schools and points of contention, identify current research gaps, and present the review in a coherent paragraph with rigorous logic and proper citation style.

Помощник по обзору литературы

Act as a senior academic researcher to systematically review key literature in the provided research topic over the last five years. Identify major theoretical schools, core controversies, and recent trends, summarizing contributions and gaps in a coherent paragraph without using lists or structured templates, ensuring natural academic language, and finally pointing out potential future research voids.

Редактор статей

Act as a senior academic journal editor and deeply polish the provided English academic paragraph. Focus on optimizing the logical coherence of sentence structures, correcting grammatical errors, and replacing colloquial expressions with more rigorous academic vocabulary, while ensuring compliance with APA citation format standards. Finally, output the revised complete paragraph along with explanations of the main modifications.