符合教學大綱的大學物理期末考卷自動命題工具

首頁

AI 提示詞列表

學術/教師

大學物理期末考卷命題

${:__('collect %s',大學物理期末考卷命題)}$

學術/教師

依據給定的教學大綱範圍、知識點占比、題型分布和難度要求，生成一套格式規範、考點覆蓋完整的大學物理上學期期末閉卷考試考卷。

提示內容

複製

Follow the syllabus requirements for the first volume of college physics, refer to the knowledge weight distribution of 40% mechanics, 25% thermology and 35% electromagnetism, design 10 multiple-choice questions, 5 fill-in questions, 3 calculation questions and 2 proof analysis questions, follow the difficulty ratio of 5:3:2 for easy, medium and hard, generate a standardized closed-book final exam, mark the corresponding knowledge point for each question, ensure no out-of-syllabus content and keep the expression clear and rigorous.

複製

你需要按照給定的大學物理上冊教學大綱要求，參考力學占40%、熱學占25%、電磁學占35%的知識點占比，設計10道單選題、5道填空題、3道計算題和2道證明分析題，按照易中難5:3:2的難度分布，生成一套格式規範的閉卷期末考試考卷，每個題目對應標註考點，確實沒有超綱內容，表述清晰嚴謹。

複製

分享點擊複製鏈接

評論 (0)

0/300

提交

推薦

論文文獻綜述助手

Act as a senior academic researcher. Based on the specific subject topic and key reference list I provide, write a rigorous literature review. You must deeply analyze the main theoretical frameworks, methodological differences, and current academic controversies in existing studies, and point out potential directions for future research. Ensure the language style meets academic journal publication standards, with coherent logic and standardized citations. Avoid subjective assumptions and only synthesize objectively based on the provided literature. Conclude with a summary statement highlighting recent progress and gaps in the field.

論文文獻綜述助手

Act as a senior academic researcher. Based on the provided research topic and core reference list, write a rigorous literature review. First, outline the development trajectory of the field, identifying key theoretical divergences and research gaps. Then, synthesize the core arguments of various papers, pointing out current limitations, and finally propose innovative future research directions. Ensure academic language, logical rigor, and accurate citation of provided sources, avoiding subjective assumptions while maintaining an objective tone. Output a complete review text suitable for a thesis introduction or discussion section.

論文文獻綜述助手

Act as a senior academic researcher. Based on the specific research topic and keywords I provide,梳理 key academic literature from the past five years. Identify major theoretical schools, points of contention, and recent trends. Summarize 3-5 core research questions in a coherent natural paragraph, avoiding lists or structured templates. Ensure the language is fluent and academically appropriate, and conclude with a brief analysis of research gaps.

論文文獻綜述助手

Act as my academic research assistant. For the specific research topic I provide, summarize key academic literature from the past five years, categorize major theoretical schools and points of contention, identify current research gaps, and present the review in a coherent paragraph with rigorous logic and proper citation style.

論文文獻綜述助手

Act as a senior academic researcher to systematically review key literature in the provided research topic over the last five years. Identify major theoretical schools, core controversies, and recent trends, summarizing contributions and gaps in a coherent paragraph without using lists or structured templates, ensuring natural academic language, and finally pointing out potential future research voids.

論文潤色助手

Act as a senior academic journal editor and deeply polish the provided English academic paragraph. Focus on optimizing the logical coherence of sentence structures, correcting grammatical errors, and replacing colloquial expressions with more rigorous academic vocabulary, while ensuring compliance with APA citation format standards. Finally, output the revised complete paragraph along with explanations of the main modifications.