Authors Stage Blank Book Protest Against AI with Kazuo Ishiguro

Approximately 10,000 authors recently collaborated on a special publication titled "Don't Steal This Book," protesting the unauthorized use of their works by AI companies for model training. Contributors include Nobel laureate Kazuo Ishiguro, acclaimed historical novelist Philippa Gregory, and bestselling writer Richard Osman, alongside numerous other literary figures.
In a striking gesture, the book is entirely blank except for its list of authors. This symbolic act serves as a powerful statement: without proper protection of authors' copyrights, the future landscape of creativity risks becoming a void.
The background and demands of this protest:
Allegations of "creative theft": Event organizer and composer Newton-Rex stated that the current generative AI industry is founded on "systematic unauthorized use." AI firms profit from copyrighted material without consent or compensation, constituting not merely an economic loss but a disrespect for creative endeavor.
Engaging with UK copyright law reform: This action coincides with a critical period, as the UK government prepares to release an assessment report on proposed copyright law amendments. Current draft proposals lean toward permitting AI companies to use protected works without explicit permission, unless creators actively opt out—a stance that has provoked widespread dismay across the creative sector.
Pressure on professional viability: Author Marlowe Blackburn stressed that requiring AI companies to pay for training data is a fundamental and fair expectation. Generative AI now directly competes with creators, and should the law further legitimize such practices, it would threaten the livelihoods of countless artists.
Global surge of legal challenges: Last year, AI leader Anthropic agreed to a $1.5 billion settlement in a related class-action lawsuit. The collective voice of these 10,000 writers signals that the clash between creators and technology giants over intellectual property rights is intensifying significantly.
Concurrently, publishing rights licensing services are developing collective licensing frameworks, seeking to establish lawful pathways for usage that balance the interests of AI development and the creative industries.
Related article
DeepMind CEO Hassabis: I sleep six hours a day, usually feel energetic around 1 a.m.
Fortune recently featured an interview with Demis Hassabis, CEO of Google DeepMind, revealing his unconventional approach to rest and productivity. Hassabis disclosed that he sleeps very little, structuring his waking hours into two distinct work blo
OpenAI, Anthropic Vie for Market Share Despite Revenue Shortfalls
Despite recent reports suggesting OpenAI missed revenue targets, creating pressure on tech stocks this Tuesday, private AI lab investors remain resilient. Seasoned backers have confirmed they will not reduce investment despite negative media coverage
California AV Compliance: A New Era of Tickets, Geofences, and 1M Miles
Guident operates an AuveTech shuttle in South Florida, managing a four-mile route in West Palm Beach and a one-mile route in Boca Raton using its remote monitoring technology. | Credit: GuidentCalifornia is redefining the regulatory landscape for dri
Related Special Topic Recommendations
Comments (0)
0/500

Approximately 10,000 authors recently collaborated on a special publication titled "Don't Steal This Book," protesting the unauthorized use of their works by AI companies for model training. Contributors include Nobel laureate Kazuo Ishiguro, acclaimed historical novelist Philippa Gregory, and bestselling writer Richard Osman, alongside numerous other literary figures.
In a striking gesture, the book is entirely blank except for its list of authors. This symbolic act serves as a powerful statement: without proper protection of authors' copyrights, the future landscape of creativity risks becoming a void.
The background and demands of this protest:
Allegations of "creative theft": Event organizer and composer Newton-Rex stated that the current generative AI industry is founded on "systematic unauthorized use." AI firms profit from copyrighted material without consent or compensation, constituting not merely an economic loss but a disrespect for creative endeavor.
Engaging with UK copyright law reform: This action coincides with a critical period, as the UK government prepares to release an assessment report on proposed copyright law amendments. Current draft proposals lean toward permitting AI companies to use protected works without explicit permission, unless creators actively opt out—a stance that has provoked widespread dismay across the creative sector.
Pressure on professional viability: Author Marlowe Blackburn stressed that requiring AI companies to pay for training data is a fundamental and fair expectation. Generative AI now directly competes with creators, and should the law further legitimize such practices, it would threaten the livelihoods of countless artists.
Global surge of legal challenges: Last year, AI leader Anthropic agreed to a $1.5 billion settlement in a related class-action lawsuit. The collective voice of these 10,000 writers signals that the clash between creators and technology giants over intellectual property rights is intensifying significantly.
Concurrently, publishing rights licensing services are developing collective licensing frameworks, seeking to establish lawful pathways for usage that balance the interests of AI development and the creative industries.
DeepMind CEO Hassabis: I sleep six hours a day, usually feel energetic around 1 a.m.
Fortune recently featured an interview with Demis Hassabis, CEO of Google DeepMind, revealing his unconventional approach to rest and productivity. Hassabis disclosed that he sleeps very little, structuring his waking hours into two distinct work blo
OpenAI, Anthropic Vie for Market Share Despite Revenue Shortfalls
Despite recent reports suggesting OpenAI missed revenue targets, creating pressure on tech stocks this Tuesday, private AI lab investors remain resilient. Seasoned backers have confirmed they will not reduce investment despite negative media coverage





Home






