Step-2-16K VS GLM-4-32B-0414
| Model Name | Affiliated organization | Release time | Model parameter quantity | Comprehensive score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Step-2-16K | StepFun | July 4, 2024 | N/A | 6.5 |
| GLM-4-32B-0414 | Zhipu AI | April 14, 2025 | 32B | 6 |
Comprehensive score
Language dialogue
Knowledge reserve
Reasoning association
Mathematical calculation
Code writing
Command following
Swipe left and right to view more
Brief Comparison of Step-2-16K VS GLM-4-32B-0414 AI Models
Comprehensive Capability Comparison
Step-2-16K shows relatively better task comprehension and completion, while GLM-4-32B-0414 has inconsistent performance and unstable output quality.
Language Understanding Comparison
GLM-4-32B-0414 handles basic tasks; Step-2-16K often fails to communicate effectively.
Mathematical Reasoning Comparison
Step-2-16K has some limitations but remains functional for simple tasks. GLM-4-32B-0414 frequently fails and is ineffective for meaningful reasoning.
