o3-mini-high VS Qwen3-32B (Thinking)
| Model Name | Affiliated organization | Release time | Model parameter quantity | Comprehensive score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| o3-mini-high | OpenAI | January 31, 2025 | N/A | 6.9 |
| Qwen3-32B (Thinking) | Alibaba | April 29, 2025 | 32B | 7.1 |
Comprehensive score
Language dialogue
Knowledge reserve
Reasoning association
Mathematical calculation
Code writing
Command following
Swipe left and right to view more
Brief Comparison of o3-mini-high VS Qwen3-32B (Thinking) AI Models
Comprehensive Capability Comparison
Qwen3-32B (Thinking) is capable of handling most routine tasks, while o3-mini-high lacks accuracy in information processing and consistency in execution.
Language Understanding Comparison
Qwen3-32B (Thinking) handles tasks reasonably well; o3-mini-high often produces incoherent or disconnected responses.
Mathematical Reasoning Comparison
o3-mini-high is marginally better in basic reasoning tasks, showing more stability and accuracy.
