o3-mini-high VS GLM-4-32B-0414
| Model Name | Affiliated organization | Release time | Model parameter quantity | Comprehensive score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| o3-mini-high | OpenAI | January 31, 2025 | N/A | 6.9 |
| GLM-4-32B-0414 | Zhipu AI | April 14, 2025 | 32B | 6 |
Comprehensive score
Language dialogue
Knowledge reserve
Reasoning association
Mathematical calculation
Code writing
Command following
Swipe left and right to view more
Brief Comparison of o3-mini-high VS GLM-4-32B-0414 AI Models
Comprehensive Capability Comparison
o3-mini-high shows relatively better task comprehension and completion, while GLM-4-32B-0414 has inconsistent performance and unstable output quality.
Language Understanding Comparison
o3-mini-high is slightly more reliable in basic expressions; GLM-4-32B-0414 lacks semantic consistency.
Mathematical Reasoning Comparison
o3-mini-high has some limitations but remains functional for simple tasks. GLM-4-32B-0414 frequently fails and is ineffective for meaningful reasoning.
