Llama3.1-405B-Instruct-FP8 VS Step-2-16K
| Model Name | Affiliated organization | Release time | Model parameter quantity | Comprehensive score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Llama3.1-405B-Instruct-FP8 | Meta | July 23, 2024 | 70B | 5.8 |
| Step-2-16K | StepFun | July 4, 2024 | N/A | 6.5 |
Comprehensive score
Language dialogue
Knowledge reserve
Reasoning association
Mathematical calculation
Code writing
Command following
Swipe left and right to view more
Brief Comparison of Llama3.1-405B-Instruct-FP8 VS Step-2-16K AI Models
Comprehensive Capability Comparison
Step-2-16K still retains some practical value, whereas Llama3.1-405B-Instruct-FP8 lacks basic execution capability and is limited in applicability.
Language Understanding Comparison
Both models are unreliable with high error rates, unsuitable for meaningful tasks.
Mathematical Reasoning Comparison
Llama3.1-405B-Instruct-FP8 handles typical reasoning tasks effectively. Step-2-16K often generates flawed outputs or lacks contextual consistency.
