シラバス準拠の大学微積分期末試験の自動生成

家

AIプロンプト一覧

学者/教師

大学微積分期末試験生成ツール

${:__('collect %s',大学微積分期末試験生成ツール)}$

学者/教師

教育シラバスの要件、難易度分布、出題範囲のルールに基づき、問題形式、配点、解答要点を含む完全な大学公開微積分の期末閉鎖試験問題を自動生成します。

プロンプト内容

コピー

Create a 100-point, 120-minute closed-book final exam for general college public calculus course based on common national teaching syllabi. Set 50% basic questions, 35% intermediate questions and 15% advanced questions, cover four core modules including limits and continuity, single-variable differential calculus, single-variable integral calculus and multi-variable differential calculus, match the score proportion of each module to class hour allocation, and add clear question type settings and complete reference answer points.

コピー

我が国の現在の一般大学公開微積分課程の教育シラバスに基づき、満点100点、試験時間120分の閉鎖期末試験問題を作成し、基礎問題が50%、中級問題が35%、難問が15%を占めるように設定し、極限と連続、一変数関数微分学、一変数関数積分学、多変数関数微分学の4つのコアモジュールをカバーし、各モジュールの配点がシラバスの授業時間割合に準拠し、明確な問題形式設定と完全な解答要点を付与してください。

コピー

共有リンクをコピーするにはクリック

コメント (0)

0/300

送信

おすすめ

論文文献レビュー支援

Act as a senior academic researcher and write a detailed literature review for the provided research topic. First, outline core findings from the last five years, identifying major schools of thought and points of contention, while summarizing key theoretical models. Next, critically evaluate the limitations of existing research, pointing out methodological flaws or data gaps. Finally, based on this analysis, propose potential future research directions and theoretical breakthroughs, ensuring rigorous logic and standardized citations to support subsequent empirical studies.

論文文献レビュー支援

Act as a senior academic researcher and systematically review key scholarly literature from the past five years regarding my provided research topic. You need to identify major theoretical schools, core controversies, and recent research trends, summarizing existing contributions and gaps in a coherent paragraph format. Avoid lists or bullet points, ensuring the language adheres to academic standards and logical rigor, ultimately forming a complete literature review background description.

論文文献レビュー支援

Act as a senior academic researcher to synthesize key literature for a specific research topic and keywords provided by the user. Identify main theoretical frameworks, controversies, and recent trends from the last five years. Write a coherent literature review in natural language that compares core viewpoints, evaluates methodologies, discusses limitations, and suggests future research directions, ensuring logical rigor and academic standards.

論文文献レビュー支援

Act as a senior academic researcher. For the specific research topic I provide, synthesize key academic literature from the last five years. Identify major theoretical schools, summarize core controversies, and point out current research gaps. Finally, construct a logically rigorous review framework based on this analysis, suggesting three to five innovative future research directions, ensuring content meets academic standards and citation formats are correct.

論文文献レビュー支援

Act as a senior academic researcher. For the specific research topic provided by the user, retrieve and integrate key academic literature from the past five years. You need to identify core controversies in the field, major theoretical schools, and recent empirical findings, and sort out the evolutionary trajectory from classical theories to frontier research. Finally, generate a structured literature review outline containing main viewpoints, methodological differences, and future research gaps, ensuring logical coherence and standardized citations to support the user's thesis writing needs.

論文文献レビュー支援

Act as an academic researcher specializing in higher education. Based on the provided research topic and core reference list, draft a rigorous literature review. Identify major theoretical schools, compare methodological differences among scholars, and highlight gaps or controversies in current research. Ensure the language is objective, formal, and adheres to academic standards, avoiding colloquialisms. Logically connect these viewpoints to form a critical review text that assists faculty in course syllabus design or research planning.