学術文献レビュー生成ツール

家

AIプロンプト一覧

学者/教師

論文文献レビュー支援

${:__('collect %s',論文文献レビュー支援)}$

学者/教師

大学教員向けに、特定の研究トピックと参考文献リストから構造化された文献レビューを生成するプロンプト。

プロンプト内容

コピー

Act as an academic researcher specializing in higher education. Based on the provided research topic and core reference list, draft a rigorous literature review. Identify major theoretical schools, compare methodological differences among scholars, and highlight gaps or controversies in current research. Ensure the language is objective, formal, and adheres to academic standards, avoiding colloquialisms. Logically connect these viewpoints to form a critical review text that assists faculty in course syllabus design or research planning.

コピー

高等教育分野の専門研究者として振る舞ってください。提供された研究トピックとコア参考文献リストに基づき、厳格な文献レビューを作成してください。主要な理論流派を特定し、学者間の方法論的差異を比較し、現在の研究におけるギャップや論争点を明確にしてください。言語は客観的、形式的で学術規範に従い、口語表現を避けてください。これらの視点を論理的に結びつけ、教員のコースシラバス設計や研究計画を支援する批判的なレビューテキストを形成してください。

コピー

共有リンクをコピーするにはクリック

コメント (0)

0/300

送信

おすすめ

論文文献レビュー支援

Act as a senior academic researcher. Based on the specific subject topic and key reference list I provide, write a rigorous literature review. You must deeply analyze the main theoretical frameworks, methodological differences, and current academic controversies in existing studies, and point out potential directions for future research. Ensure the language style meets academic journal publication standards, with coherent logic and standardized citations. Avoid subjective assumptions and only synthesize objectively based on the provided literature. Conclude with a summary statement highlighting recent progress and gaps in the field.

論文文献レビュー支援

Act as a senior academic researcher. Based on the provided research topic and core reference list, write a rigorous literature review. First, outline the development trajectory of the field, identifying key theoretical divergences and research gaps. Then, synthesize the core arguments of various papers, pointing out current limitations, and finally propose innovative future research directions. Ensure academic language, logical rigor, and accurate citation of provided sources, avoiding subjective assumptions while maintaining an objective tone. Output a complete review text suitable for a thesis introduction or discussion section.

論文文献レビュー支援

Act as a senior academic researcher. Based on the specific research topic and keywords I provide,梳理 key academic literature from the past five years. Identify major theoretical schools, points of contention, and recent trends. Summarize 3-5 core research questions in a coherent natural paragraph, avoiding lists or structured templates. Ensure the language is fluent and academically appropriate, and conclude with a brief analysis of research gaps.

論文文献レビュー支援

Act as my academic research assistant. For the specific research topic I provide, summarize key academic literature from the past five years, categorize major theoretical schools and points of contention, identify current research gaps, and present the review in a coherent paragraph with rigorous logic and proper citation style.

文献レビュー支援

Act as a senior academic researcher to systematically review key literature in the provided research topic over the last five years. Identify major theoretical schools, core controversies, and recent trends, summarizing contributions and gaps in a coherent paragraph without using lists or structured templates, ensuring natural academic language, and finally pointing out potential future research voids.

論文校正アシスタント

Act as a senior academic journal editor and deeply polish the provided English academic paragraph. Focus on optimizing the logical coherence of sentence structures, correcting grammatical errors, and replacing colloquial expressions with more rigorous academic vocabulary, while ensuring compliance with APA citation format standards. Finally, output the revised complete paragraph along with explanations of the main modifications.