교육과정에 맞는 대학 미적분학 기말고사 자동 생성

집

AI 프롬프트 목록

학자/교사

대학 미적분학 기말고사 시험지 생성 도구

${:__('collect %s',대학 미적분학 기말고사 시험지 생성 도구)}$

학자/교사

교육과정 요구사항, 난이도 분포, 출제 범위 규칙에 따라 문항 유형, 배점, 참고 답안이 포함된 완전한 대학 공통 미적분학 기말 폐쇄 시험지를 자동 생성합니다.

프롬프트 내용

복사

Create a 100-point, 120-minute closed-book final exam for general college public calculus course based on common national teaching syllabi. Set 50% basic questions, 35% intermediate questions and 15% advanced questions, cover four core modules including limits and continuity, single-variable differential calculus, single-variable integral calculus and multi-variable differential calculus, match the score proportion of each module to class hour allocation, and add clear question type settings and complete reference answer points.

복사

중국 현행 일반 대학 공통 미적분학 과정 교육과정에 따라 총점 100점, 시험 시간 120분의 폐쇄 기말 시험지를 생성하세요. 기본 문제 50%, 중급 문제 35%, 고난도 문제 15% 비율로 설정하고 극한과 연속, 일변수 함수 미분학, 일변수 함수 적분학, 다변수 함수 미분학 4가지 핵심 모듈을 커버하며 각 모듈 배점은 교육과정 수업 시간 비율에 맞추고 명확한 문항 유형 설정과 완전한 참고 답안 포인트를 추가해주세요.

복사

공유 링크를 복사하려면 클릭

의견 (0)

0/300

제출하다

추천

문헌 리뷰 어시스턴트

Act as a senior academic researcher and write a detailed literature review for the provided research topic. First, outline core findings from the last five years, identifying major schools of thought and points of contention, while summarizing key theoretical models. Next, critically evaluate the limitations of existing research, pointing out methodological flaws or data gaps. Finally, based on this analysis, propose potential future research directions and theoretical breakthroughs, ensuring rigorous logic and standardized citations to support subsequent empirical studies.

문헌 검토 어시스턴트

Act as a senior academic researcher and systematically review key scholarly literature from the past five years regarding my provided research topic. You need to identify major theoretical schools, core controversies, and recent research trends, summarizing existing contributions and gaps in a coherent paragraph format. Avoid lists or bullet points, ensuring the language adheres to academic standards and logical rigor, ultimately forming a complete literature review background description.

문헌 검토 어시스턴트

Act as a senior academic researcher to synthesize key literature for a specific research topic and keywords provided by the user. Identify main theoretical frameworks, controversies, and recent trends from the last five years. Write a coherent literature review in natural language that compares core viewpoints, evaluates methodologies, discusses limitations, and suggests future research directions, ensuring logical rigor and academic standards.

문헌 검토 어시스턴트

Act as a senior academic researcher. For the specific research topic I provide, synthesize key academic literature from the last five years. Identify major theoretical schools, summarize core controversies, and point out current research gaps. Finally, construct a logically rigorous review framework based on this analysis, suggesting three to five innovative future research directions, ensuring content meets academic standards and citation formats are correct.

문헌 검토 보조 도구

Act as a senior academic researcher. For the specific research topic provided by the user, retrieve and integrate key academic literature from the past five years. You need to identify core controversies in the field, major theoretical schools, and recent empirical findings, and sort out the evolutionary trajectory from classical theories to frontier research. Finally, generate a structured literature review outline containing main viewpoints, methodological differences, and future research gaps, ensuring logical coherence and standardized citations to support the user's thesis writing needs.

문헌 검토 보조 도구

Act as an academic researcher specializing in higher education. Based on the provided research topic and core reference list, draft a rigorous literature review. Identify major theoretical schools, compare methodological differences among scholars, and highlight gaps or controversies in current research. Ensure the language is objective, formal, and adheres to academic standards, avoiding colloquialisms. Logically connect these viewpoints to form a critical review text that assists faculty in course syllabus design or research planning.