选项
首页 AI 提示词列表 学术/教师 大学微积分课程期末试卷生成工具

大学微积分课程期末试卷生成工具

{:__('collect %s',大学微积分课程期末试卷生成工具)}

根据给定的教学大纲要求、难度分布和考点覆盖规则,自动生成一套完整的大学公共微积分期末闭卷考试试卷,包含题型设置、分值分配和参考答案要点。

提示内容 复制 复制

Create a 100-point, 120-minute closed-book final exam for general college public calculus course based on common national teaching syllabi. Set 50% basic questions, 35% intermediate questions and 15% advanced questions, cover four core modules including limits and continuity, single-variable differential calculus, single-variable integral calculus and multi-variable differential calculus, match the score proportion of each module to class hour allocation, and add clear question type settings and complete reference answer points.

复制 复制

根据我国现行普通高校公共微积分课程的教学大纲,生成一套总分为100分、考试时长120分钟的闭卷期末考试试卷,要求基础题占比50%、中等题占比35%、难题占比15%,覆盖极限与连续、一元函数微分学、一元函数积分学、多元函数微分学四个核心模块,每个模块对应分值符合大纲课时占比,搭配清晰的题型设置和完整的参考答案要点。

复制 复制
评论 (0)
0/300

推荐

论文文献综述助手
Act as a senior academic researcher and write a detailed literature review for the provided research topic. First, outline core findings from the last five years, identifying major schools of thought and points of contention, while summarizing key theoretical models. Next, critically evaluate the limitations of existing research, pointing out methodological flaws or data gaps. Finally, based on this analysis, propose potential future research directions and theoretical breakthroughs, ensuring rigorous logic and standardized citations to support subsequent empirical studies.
论文文献综述助手
Act as a senior academic researcher and systematically review key scholarly literature from the past five years regarding my provided research topic. You need to identify major theoretical schools, core controversies, and recent research trends, summarizing existing contributions and gaps in a coherent paragraph format. Avoid lists or bullet points, ensuring the language adheres to academic standards and logical rigor, ultimately forming a complete literature review background description.
论文文献综述助手
Act as a senior academic researcher to synthesize key literature for a specific research topic and keywords provided by the user. Identify main theoretical frameworks, controversies, and recent trends from the last five years. Write a coherent literature review in natural language that compares core viewpoints, evaluates methodologies, discusses limitations, and suggests future research directions, ensuring logical rigor and academic standards.
论文文献综述助手
Act as a senior academic researcher. For the specific research topic I provide, synthesize key academic literature from the last five years. Identify major theoretical schools, summarize core controversies, and point out current research gaps. Finally, construct a logically rigorous review framework based on this analysis, suggesting three to five innovative future research directions, ensuring content meets academic standards and citation formats are correct.
论文文献综述助手
Act as a senior academic researcher. For the specific research topic provided by the user, retrieve and integrate key academic literature from the past five years. You need to identify core controversies in the field, major theoretical schools, and recent empirical findings, and sort out the evolutionary trajectory from classical theories to frontier research. Finally, generate a structured literature review outline containing main viewpoints, methodological differences, and future research gaps, ensuring logical coherence and standardized citations to support the user's thesis writing needs.
论文文献综述助手
Act as an academic researcher specializing in higher education. Based on the provided research topic and core reference list, draft a rigorous literature review. Identify major theoretical schools, compare methodological differences among scholars, and highlight gaps or controversies in current research. Ensure the language is objective, formal, and adheres to academic standards, avoiding colloquialisms. Logically connect these viewpoints to form a critical review text that assists faculty in course syllabus design or research planning.
OR