大学学部理系科目向け標準化閉じ込み期末試験問題作成

家

AIプロンプト一覧

学者/教師

大学理系科目の閉じ込み期末試験問題作成

${:__('collect %s',大学理系科目の閉じ込み期末試験問題作成)}$

学者/教師

大学理系学部の科目に対し、シラバスの要件に基づき、難易度分布が適切で出題範囲が網羅的な標準化閉じ込み期末試験問題を作成し、各種問題形式と配点を設定して学部教育の評価ニーズに応えます。

プロンプト内容

コピー

Create a closed-book final exam for an undergraduate STEM course following the given syllabus and taught knowledge distribution. Set reasonable proportions and scores for multiple choice, fill-in-the-blank, calculation and short answer questions, keep the difficulty ratio of basic, medium and advanced questions at 7:2:1, cover all core teaching chapters, and attach corresponding reference answers and scoring criteria.

コピー

指定された大学理系学部科目のシラバスの要件に従い、講義された知識点の分布に合わせて、閉じ込み形式の期末試験問題を1セット作成してください。選択問題、穴埋め問題、計算問題、簡答問題の問題形式ごとの割合と対応する配点を合理的に設定し、基礎問題・中級問題・発展問題の難易度割合が7:2:1の要件を満たし、出題範囲がすべてのコア講義章をカバーし、対応する模範解答と採点基準を添付してください。

コピー

共有リンクをコピーするにはクリック

コメント (0)

0/300

送信

おすすめ

論文文献レビュー支援

Act as a senior academic researcher. For the provided research topic, synthesize core literature from the last five years, identify key academic debates, summarize current research limitations, and propose three innovative future research directions with rigorous logic and standard citations.

論文文献レビュー支援

Act as a senior academic researcher. Based on the specific subject matter and key reference list I provide, write an in-depth literature review. First, map the research trajectory and identify core controversies and theoretical evolutions. Then, synthesize major viewpoints from various scholars, highlighting current research gaps and limitations. Finally, propose forward-looking future research directions. Ensure the language is rigorous and logical, strictly adhering to academic citation norms without subjective speculation, aiming to provide a solid theoretical and empirical foundation for my subsequent research.

論文文献レビュー支援

Act as a senior academic researcher and write a detailed literature review for the provided research topic. First, outline core findings from the last five years, identifying major schools of thought and points of contention, while summarizing key theoretical models. Next, critically evaluate the limitations of existing research, pointing out methodological flaws or data gaps. Finally, based on this analysis, propose potential future research directions and theoretical breakthroughs, ensuring rigorous logic and standardized citations to support subsequent empirical studies.

論文文献レビュー支援

Act as a senior academic researcher and systematically review key scholarly literature from the past five years regarding my provided research topic. You need to identify major theoretical schools, core controversies, and recent research trends, summarizing existing contributions and gaps in a coherent paragraph format. Avoid lists or bullet points, ensuring the language adheres to academic standards and logical rigor, ultimately forming a complete literature review background description.

論文文献レビュー支援

Act as a senior academic researcher to synthesize key literature for a specific research topic and keywords provided by the user. Identify main theoretical frameworks, controversies, and recent trends from the last five years. Write a coherent literature review in natural language that compares core viewpoints, evaluates methodologies, discusses limitations, and suggests future research directions, ensuring logical rigor and academic standards.

論文文献レビュー支援

Act as a senior academic researcher. For the specific research topic I provide, synthesize key academic literature from the last five years. Identify major theoretical schools, summarize core controversies, and point out current research gaps. Finally, construct a logically rigorous review framework based on this analysis, suggesting three to five innovative future research directions, ensuring content meets academic standards and citation formats are correct.