Conception standardisée d'examen final fermé pour STEM licence

Maison

Liste de prompts IA

Académique/Enseignant

Conception d'examen final fermé pour cours STEM universitaire

${:__('collect %s',Conception d'examen final fermé pour cours STEM universitaire)}$

Académique/Enseignant

Créez un examen final fermé standardisé couvrant tous les points clés avec une distribution de difficulté adaptée selon le programme du cours pour les étudiants en licence STEM, incluant types de questions et barèmes.

Contenu du prompt

Copier

Create a closed-book final exam for an undergraduate STEM course following the given syllabus and taught knowledge distribution. Set reasonable proportions and scores for multiple choice, fill-in-the-blank, calculation and short answer questions, keep the difficulty ratio of basic, medium and advanced questions at 7:2:1, cover all core teaching chapters, and attach corresponding reference answers and scoring criteria.

Copier

Créez un examen final fermé pour un cours STEM de licence conformément au programme donné et à la distribution des connaissances enseignées. Définissez des proportions et des notes raisonnables pour les questions à choix multiples, les questions à compléter, les calculs et les questions à réponse courte, maintenez le rapport de difficulté 7:2:1 entre les questions basiques, moyennes et avancées, couvrez tous les chapitres de cours principaux et ajoutez les réponses de référence et les critères de notation correspondants.

Copier

Partager Cliquez pour copier le lien

commentaires (0)

0/300

Soumettre

Recommandation

Assistant Revue Littérature

Act as a senior academic researcher. For the provided research topic, synthesize core literature from the last five years, identify key academic debates, summarize current research limitations, and propose three innovative future research directions with rigorous logic and standard citations.

Assistant Revue Littérature

Act as a senior academic researcher. Based on the specific subject matter and key reference list I provide, write an in-depth literature review. First, map the research trajectory and identify core controversies and theoretical evolutions. Then, synthesize major viewpoints from various scholars, highlighting current research gaps and limitations. Finally, propose forward-looking future research directions. Ensure the language is rigorous and logical, strictly adhering to academic citation norms without subjective speculation, aiming to provide a solid theoretical and empirical foundation for my subsequent research.

Assistant Revue Littérature

Act as a senior academic researcher and write a detailed literature review for the provided research topic. First, outline core findings from the last five years, identifying major schools of thought and points of contention, while summarizing key theoretical models. Next, critically evaluate the limitations of existing research, pointing out methodological flaws or data gaps. Finally, based on this analysis, propose potential future research directions and theoretical breakthroughs, ensuring rigorous logic and standardized citations to support subsequent empirical studies.

Assistant Revue Littérature

Act as a senior academic researcher and systematically review key scholarly literature from the past five years regarding my provided research topic. You need to identify major theoretical schools, core controversies, and recent research trends, summarizing existing contributions and gaps in a coherent paragraph format. Avoid lists or bullet points, ensuring the language adheres to academic standards and logical rigor, ultimately forming a complete literature review background description.

Assistant Revue Littérature

Act as a senior academic researcher to synthesize key literature for a specific research topic and keywords provided by the user. Identify main theoretical frameworks, controversies, and recent trends from the last five years. Write a coherent literature review in natural language that compares core viewpoints, evaluates methodologies, discusses limitations, and suggests future research directions, ensuring logical rigor and academic standards.

Assistant Revue Littérature

Act as a senior academic researcher. For the specific research topic I provide, synthesize key academic literature from the last five years. Identify major theoretical schools, summarize core controversies, and point out current research gaps. Finally, construct a logically rigorous review framework based on this analysis, suggesting three to five innovative future research directions, ensuring content meets academic standards and citation formats are correct.