학부 이공계용 표준화 폐관식 기말고사 시험지 출제

집

AI 프롬프트 목록

학자/교사

대학 이공계 과정 폐관식 기말고사 출제

${:__('collect %s',대학 이공계 과정 폐관식 기말고사 출제)}$

학자/교사

대학 이공계 학부 과정에 대해 교육과정 요구에 맞춰 난이도 분포가 적절하고 핵심考点를 전부 커버하는 표준화 폐관식 기말고사를 출제하며, 각 유형별 문항과 배점을 설정해 학부 교육 평가 요구에 부응합니다.

프롬프트 내용

복사

Create a closed-book final exam for an undergraduate STEM course following the given syllabus and taught knowledge distribution. Set reasonable proportions and scores for multiple choice, fill-in-the-blank, calculation and short answer questions, keep the difficulty ratio of basic, medium and advanced questions at 7:2:1, cover all core teaching chapters, and attach corresponding reference answers and scoring criteria.

복사

주어진 학부 이공계 과정 교육과정 요구에 따라 강의한 지식점 분포에 맞춰 폐관식 형태의 기말고사 시험지 한 세트를 출제해 주세요. 객관식, 빈칸채우기, 계산문제, 단답형 문제의 문항 비율과 해당 배점을 합리적으로 설정하고, 기본문제, 중간문제, 고난도 문제의 난이도 비율이 7:2:1 요구를 만족하며, 모든 핵심 강의 챕터를 커버하고, 해당 참고답안과 채점 기준을 첨부해 주세요.

복사

공유 링크를 복사하려면 클릭

의견 (0)

0/300

제출하다

추천

문헌 검토 어시스턴트

Act as a senior academic researcher. For the provided research topic, synthesize core literature from the last five years, identify key academic debates, summarize current research limitations, and propose three innovative future research directions with rigorous logic and standard citations.

문헌 검토 보조 도구

Act as a senior academic researcher. Based on the specific subject matter and key reference list I provide, write an in-depth literature review. First, map the research trajectory and identify core controversies and theoretical evolutions. Then, synthesize major viewpoints from various scholars, highlighting current research gaps and limitations. Finally, propose forward-looking future research directions. Ensure the language is rigorous and logical, strictly adhering to academic citation norms without subjective speculation, aiming to provide a solid theoretical and empirical foundation for my subsequent research.

문헌 리뷰 어시스턴트

Act as a senior academic researcher and write a detailed literature review for the provided research topic. First, outline core findings from the last five years, identifying major schools of thought and points of contention, while summarizing key theoretical models. Next, critically evaluate the limitations of existing research, pointing out methodological flaws or data gaps. Finally, based on this analysis, propose potential future research directions and theoretical breakthroughs, ensuring rigorous logic and standardized citations to support subsequent empirical studies.

문헌 검토 어시스턴트

Act as a senior academic researcher and systematically review key scholarly literature from the past five years regarding my provided research topic. You need to identify major theoretical schools, core controversies, and recent research trends, summarizing existing contributions and gaps in a coherent paragraph format. Avoid lists or bullet points, ensuring the language adheres to academic standards and logical rigor, ultimately forming a complete literature review background description.

문헌 검토 어시스턴트

Act as a senior academic researcher to synthesize key literature for a specific research topic and keywords provided by the user. Identify main theoretical frameworks, controversies, and recent trends from the last five years. Write a coherent literature review in natural language that compares core viewpoints, evaluates methodologies, discusses limitations, and suggests future research directions, ensuring logical rigor and academic standards.

문헌 검토 어시스턴트

Act as a senior academic researcher. For the specific research topic I provide, synthesize key academic literature from the last five years. Identify major theoretical schools, summarize core controversies, and point out current research gaps. Finally, construct a logically rigorous review framework based on this analysis, suggesting three to five innovative future research directions, ensuring content meets academic standards and citation formats are correct.