Стандартное составление закрытого итогового экзамена для бакалавров STEM

Дом

Список AI-промптов

Академик/Преподаватель

Составление закрытого итогового экзамена для STEM вуза

${:__('collect %s',Составление закрытого итогового экзамена для STEM вуза)}$

Академик/Преподаватель

Составьте стандартизированный закрытый итоговый экзамен с правильным распределением сложности и полным охватом тем по учебной программе для бакалаврских курсов STEM, включая типы заданий и балльную оценку.

Содержание промпта

Копировать

Create a closed-book final exam for an undergraduate STEM course following the given syllabus and taught knowledge distribution. Set reasonable proportions and scores for multiple choice, fill-in-the-blank, calculation and short answer questions, keep the difficulty ratio of basic, medium and advanced questions at 7:2:1, cover all core teaching chapters, and attach corresponding reference answers and scoring criteria.

Копировать

Составьте один комплект закрытого итогового экзамена для бакалаврского курса STEM в соответствии с заданной учебной программой и распределением изученных тем. Установите разумную долю и баллы для заданий с выбором ответа, заполнения пропусков, вычислительных и кратких ответов, сохраните соотношение сложности базовых, средних и продвинутых заданий 7:2:1, обеспечьте охват всех основных разделов курса и приложите соответствующие эталонные ответы и критерии оценивания.

Копировать

Поделиться Нажмите, чтобы скопировать ссылку

Комментарии (0)

0/300

Представлять на рассмотрение

Рекомендация

Ассистент обзора литературы

Act as a senior academic researcher. For the provided research topic, synthesize core literature from the last five years, identify key academic debates, summarize current research limitations, and propose three innovative future research directions with rigorous logic and standard citations.

Ассистент обзора литературы

Act as a senior academic researcher. Based on the specific subject matter and key reference list I provide, write an in-depth literature review. First, map the research trajectory and identify core controversies and theoretical evolutions. Then, synthesize major viewpoints from various scholars, highlighting current research gaps and limitations. Finally, propose forward-looking future research directions. Ensure the language is rigorous and logical, strictly adhering to academic citation norms without subjective speculation, aiming to provide a solid theoretical and empirical foundation for my subsequent research.

Ассистент обзора литературы

Act as a senior academic researcher and write a detailed literature review for the provided research topic. First, outline core findings from the last five years, identifying major schools of thought and points of contention, while summarizing key theoretical models. Next, critically evaluate the limitations of existing research, pointing out methodological flaws or data gaps. Finally, based on this analysis, propose potential future research directions and theoretical breakthroughs, ensuring rigorous logic and standardized citations to support subsequent empirical studies.

Ассистент обзора литературы

Act as a senior academic researcher and systematically review key scholarly literature from the past five years regarding my provided research topic. You need to identify major theoretical schools, core controversies, and recent research trends, summarizing existing contributions and gaps in a coherent paragraph format. Avoid lists or bullet points, ensuring the language adheres to academic standards and logical rigor, ultimately forming a complete literature review background description.

Ассистент обзора литературы

Act as a senior academic researcher to synthesize key literature for a specific research topic and keywords provided by the user. Identify main theoretical frameworks, controversies, and recent trends from the last five years. Write a coherent literature review in natural language that compares core viewpoints, evaluates methodologies, discusses limitations, and suggests future research directions, ensuring logical rigor and academic standards.

Ассистент обзора литературы

Act as a senior academic researcher. For the specific research topic I provide, synthesize key academic literature from the last five years. Identify major theoretical schools, summarize core controversies, and point out current research gaps. Finally, construct a logically rigorous review framework based on this analysis, suggesting three to five innovative future research directions, ensuring content meets academic standards and citation formats are correct.