Publishers and Authors Sue Google Over Gemini AI Training Copyrights

Publishers and authors have launched a class-action lawsuit against Google, alleging the tech giant used copyrighted material without authorization to train its Gemini AI. The plaintiffs include major publishers like Hachette Livre, Cengage Group, and Elsevier, alongside prominent authors such as Scott Turow and S.C.R.I.B.E. The complaint further accuses Google of deliberately altering or removing copyright metadata to hide the fact that Gemini was trained on unauthorized content.
Google is accused of leveraging books from Google Books and the Play Store for AI training
According to the lawsuit, publishers and authors previously submitted their works to Google with the understanding that they would only be used for search indexing via Google Books. These tools were designed to show limited excerpts and tables of contents, not full texts. However, the plaintiffs argue that Google repurposed these copies to train the Gemini model and also utilized content from the Google Play Store without securing proper licenses. Internal documents referenced in the lawsuit suggest Google was aware that using copyrighted books for AI training could result in "serious issues" and fines ranging from hundreds of millions to billions of dollars.
The "fair use" defense is under scrutiny, following a $1.5 billion fine against Anthropic
This case is part of a broader wave of lawsuits filed by copyright holders against AI developers, with Google, Meta, OpenAI, and Anthropic all facing legal challenges. While recent California court decisions have favored AI companies by ruling that training on copyrighted content may qualify as "fair use," the landscape is shifting. Anthropic recently agreed to a $1.5 billion settlement for illegally using copyrighted works, marking the largest copyright settlement in U.S. history and making roughly 50,000 authors eligible for at least $3,000 each. This new lawsuit against Google was filed in the U.S. Southern District Court of New York, giving another judge the chance to rule differently on whether AI training constitutes fair use. Google has not yet commented on the allegations.
Related article
Stripe to Acquire OpenRouter as AI Model Routing Gains Momentum
Stripe has agreed to acquire OpenRouter, an AI model-routing platform that gives developers access to hundreds of models through a single interface. The deal adds model selection and routing to Stripe’s existing work around AI usage and token-based b
Former OpenAI Researcher Barrett Zoph Returns to Google to Support Gemini Development
Barret Zoph, who previously abruptly left and joined OpenAI due to a disagreement with Thinking Machines Lab CEO Miriam Mularati, has once again changed employers. Alphabet's Google announced that Zoph will return as Vice President of Research, bring
How Recursive Intelligence Raised $335M at $4B Valuation in 4 Months
The co-founders of startup Ricursive Intelligence seemed destined to be co-founders.Anna Goldie, CEO, and Azalia Mirhoseini, CTO, are so well-known in the AI community that they were among those AI engineers who “got those weird emails from Zuckerber
Related Special Topic Recommendations
Comments (0)
0/500

Publishers and authors have launched a class-action lawsuit against Google, alleging the tech giant used copyrighted material without authorization to train its Gemini AI. The plaintiffs include major publishers like Hachette Livre, Cengage Group, and Elsevier, alongside prominent authors such as Scott Turow and S.C.R.I.B.E. The complaint further accuses Google of deliberately altering or removing copyright metadata to hide the fact that Gemini was trained on unauthorized content.
Google is accused of leveraging books from Google Books and the Play Store for AI training
According to the lawsuit, publishers and authors previously submitted their works to Google with the understanding that they would only be used for search indexing via Google Books. These tools were designed to show limited excerpts and tables of contents, not full texts. However, the plaintiffs argue that Google repurposed these copies to train the Gemini model and also utilized content from the Google Play Store without securing proper licenses. Internal documents referenced in the lawsuit suggest Google was aware that using copyrighted books for AI training could result in "serious issues" and fines ranging from hundreds of millions to billions of dollars.
The "fair use" defense is under scrutiny, following a $1.5 billion fine against Anthropic
This case is part of a broader wave of lawsuits filed by copyright holders against AI developers, with Google, Meta, OpenAI, and Anthropic all facing legal challenges. While recent California court decisions have favored AI companies by ruling that training on copyrighted content may qualify as "fair use," the landscape is shifting. Anthropic recently agreed to a $1.5 billion settlement for illegally using copyrighted works, marking the largest copyright settlement in U.S. history and making roughly 50,000 authors eligible for at least $3,000 each. This new lawsuit against Google was filed in the U.S. Southern District Court of New York, giving another judge the chance to rule differently on whether AI training constitutes fair use. Google has not yet commented on the allegations.
Stripe to Acquire OpenRouter as AI Model Routing Gains Momentum
Stripe has agreed to acquire OpenRouter, an AI model-routing platform that gives developers access to hundreds of models through a single interface. The deal adds model selection and routing to Stripe’s existing work around AI usage and token-based b
Former OpenAI Researcher Barrett Zoph Returns to Google to Support Gemini Development
Barret Zoph, who previously abruptly left and joined OpenAI due to a disagreement with Thinking Machines Lab CEO Miriam Mularati, has once again changed employers. Alphabet's Google announced that Zoph will return as Vice President of Research, bring
How Recursive Intelligence Raised $335M at $4B Valuation in 4 Months
The co-founders of startup Ricursive Intelligence seemed destined to be co-founders.Anna Goldie, CEO, and Azalia Mirhoseini, CTO, are so well-known in the AI community that they were among those AI engineers who “got those weird emails from Zuckerber





Home






