符合新課標高中生物核心考點選擇題生成工具

首頁

AI 提示詞列表

學術/教師

高中生物選擇題出題工具

${:__('collect %s',高中生物選擇題出題工具)}$

學術/教師

依據指定高中生物核心知識點與難易等級，生成符合新課標要求、附詳細解析的標準化選擇題，提供教師編制隨堂檢測與單元試卷使用。

提示內容

複製

Based on the specified high school biology core knowledge point and difficulty level I provide, create five standardized single-choice questions that match the new curriculum standard requirements, each with four options, accurate question stem descriptions, reasonable option discrimination, then add the correct answer and clear explanation for each question, pointing out the test focus and error reasons of wrong options, suitable for in-class quizzes or unit test paper compilation for high school biology.

複製

請依據我給出的高中生物具體核心知識點與要求的難易等級，生成5道符合高中新課標考試規範的標準化單選題，每道題包含4個選項，題幹敘述準確嚴謹，選項設定具備合理的區分度，最後附上每道題的正確答案與清晰的解析，解析要標明考察重點與錯誤選項的錯誤原因，適合用於高中生物課堂隨堂檢測或是單元測試組卷。

複製

分享點擊複製鏈接

評論 (0)

0/300

提交

推薦

論文潤色助手

Act as an experienced academic journal editor and deeply polish the provided English academic paper excerpt. Focus on checking and correcting grammatical errors, spelling mistakes, and punctuation usage, while optimizing sentence structures to improve the rigor and fluency of academic expression. Ensure accurate terminology usage and natural logical connections, adhering to the writing style guidelines of the target journal. Finally, list the main modifications and their reasons so I can understand the improvements.

論文潤色助手

Act as a senior academic editor and deeply polish the provided English research abstract. Focus on correcting grammatical errors, replacing colloquial terms with formal academic vocabulary, and optimizing sentence structures to enhance logical flow while preserving the original meaning, ensuring the final text meets the language standards of international SCI journals.

論文邏輯審查助手

Act as a rigorous academic journal reviewer to carefully examine the provided academic paper excerpt, focusing on the logical coherence between core arguments and supporting evidence. You need to identify potential logical flaws such as reversed causality, sample bias, or overgeneralized conclusions in the argumentation process, and point out specific assertions in paragraphs that lack key data support. Additionally, evaluate whether literature citations accurately serve the current argument rather than merely acting as decorative stacking. Finally, provide revision suggestions in clear, objective academic language to help the author strengthen the rigor of the argumentation, ensuring the logical structure of the entire article is impeccable and meets high-level academic publication standards.

論文潤色助手

Act as a senior academic journal editor and deeply polish the provided English academic paper excerpt. Focus on identifying and correcting grammatical errors, inappropriate word choices, and monotonous sentence structures, ensuring the language meets the formal publication standards of international academic journals. Additionally, optimize the logical transitions between paragraphs to make the argumentation more rigorous and fluent, while preserving original technical terms and core viewpoints. Finally, briefly list the main modifications and their reasons to help the author understand the direction of improvement.

論文邏輯審查助手

Act as a senior academic editor to review the provided research paragraph, focusing on identifying logical leaps or causal reversals between arguments and evidence, and directly point out specific sentences needing correction and their reasons to enhance argument coherence and academic rigor, avoiding any template openings.

論文邏輯審查助手

Act as an academic consultant to carefully review the provided paper excerpt, focusing on evaluating the tightness of the logical connection between arguments and evidence, identifying any argumentative leaps or data interpretation biases, and offering specific revision suggestions for paragraph transitions to ensure the entire paper maintains high logical self-consistency and persuasiveness under academic standards.