옵션
집 AI 프롬프트 목록 학자/교사 고등학교 생물 객관식 문제 생성 도구

고등학교 생물 객관식 문제 생성 도구

{:__('collect %s',고등학교 생물 객관식 문제 생성 도구)}

지정된 고등학교 생물 핵심 지점과 난이도에 맞춰 상세 해설이 포함된 표준 객관식 문제를 생성해 교사의 수시 평가·단원 평가 문항 제작에 활용합니다.

프롬프트 내용 복사 복사

Based on the specified high school biology core knowledge point and difficulty level I provide, create five standardized single-choice questions that match the new curriculum standard requirements, each with four options, accurate question stem descriptions, reasonable option discrimination, then add the correct answer and clear explanation for each question, pointing out the test focus and error reasons of wrong options, suitable for in-class quizzes or unit test paper compilation for high school biology.

복사 복사

제가 제공한 고등학교 생물의 구체적인 핵심 지식점과 요청한 난이도에 맞춰 고등학교 신교육과정 시험 규범에 부합하는 표준화된 단일 객관식 문제 5문항을 만들어주세요. 각 문항은 4개의 선택지를 가지고 있고 문제 줄거리는 정확하고 엄밀하며 선택지에는 합리적인 변별력을 갖추고, 마지막에 각 문항의 정답과 명확한 해설을 첨부해주세요. 해설에는 출제 포인트와 오답의 오류 원인을 명시해야 하며, 고등학교 생물 수업 내 현장 평가나 단원 평가 문항 조합에 적합한 형태로 작성해주세요.

복사 복사
의견 (0)
0/300

추천

논문 교정 도우미
Act as an experienced academic journal editor and deeply polish the provided English academic paper excerpt. Focus on checking and correcting grammatical errors, spelling mistakes, and punctuation usage, while optimizing sentence structures to improve the rigor and fluency of academic expression. Ensure accurate terminology usage and natural logical connections, adhering to the writing style guidelines of the target journal. Finally, list the main modifications and their reasons so I can understand the improvements.
논문 교정 도우미
Act as a senior academic editor and deeply polish the provided English research abstract. Focus on correcting grammatical errors, replacing colloquial terms with formal academic vocabulary, and optimizing sentence structures to enhance logical flow while preserving the original meaning, ensuring the final text meets the language standards of international SCI journals.
논문 논리 검토 어시스턴트
Act as a rigorous academic journal reviewer to carefully examine the provided academic paper excerpt, focusing on the logical coherence between core arguments and supporting evidence. You need to identify potential logical flaws such as reversed causality, sample bias, or overgeneralized conclusions in the argumentation process, and point out specific assertions in paragraphs that lack key data support. Additionally, evaluate whether literature citations accurately serve the current argument rather than merely acting as decorative stacking. Finally, provide revision suggestions in clear, objective academic language to help the author strengthen the rigor of the argumentation, ensuring the logical structure of the entire article is impeccable and meets high-level academic publication standards.
논문 교정 도우미
Act as a senior academic journal editor and deeply polish the provided English academic paper excerpt. Focus on identifying and correcting grammatical errors, inappropriate word choices, and monotonous sentence structures, ensuring the language meets the formal publication standards of international academic journals. Additionally, optimize the logical transitions between paragraphs to make the argumentation more rigorous and fluent, while preserving original technical terms and core viewpoints. Finally, briefly list the main modifications and their reasons to help the author understand the direction of improvement.
논문 논리 검토 도우미
Act as a senior academic editor to review the provided research paragraph, focusing on identifying logical leaps or causal reversals between arguments and evidence, and directly point out specific sentences needing correction and their reasons to enhance argument coherence and academic rigor, avoiding any template openings.
논문 논리 검토 도우미
Act as an academic consultant to carefully review the provided paper excerpt, focusing on evaluating the tightness of the logical connection between arguments and evidence, identifying any argumentative leaps or data interpretation biases, and offering specific revision suggestions for paragraph transitions to ensure the entire paper maintains high logical self-consistency and persuasiveness under academic standards.
OR