新課程基準準拠高校生物核心知識点多肢選択問題生成ツール

家

AIプロンプト一覧

学者/教師

高校生物多肢選択問題作成ツール

${:__('collect %s',高校生物多肢選択問題作成ツール)}$

学者/教師

指定された高校生物の核心知識点と難易度に基づき、新課程基準に適合し詳細解説付きの標準的多肢選択問題を作成し、教師の小テストや単元テスト作成に活用できます。

プロンプト内容

コピー

Based on the specified high school biology core knowledge point and difficulty level I provide, create five standardized single-choice questions that match the new curriculum standard requirements, each with four options, accurate question stem descriptions, reasonable option discrimination, then add the correct answer and clear explanation for each question, pointing out the test focus and error reasons of wrong options, suitable for in-class quizzes or unit test paper compilation for high school biology.

コピー

提示された高校生物の具体的な核心知識点と指定された難易度に基づき、高校新課程基準の試験規範に合致した標準的単一選択問題を5問作成してください。各問題には4つの選択肢を設け、問題文の表現は正確かつ厳密で、選択肢には適切な識別力を持たせ、最後に各問題の正答と明確な解説を添付してください。解説では出題のポイントと誤り選択肢の誤りの原因を明記し、高校生物の授業内小テストや単元テストの問題作成に利用できる形にまとめてください。

コピー

共有リンクをコピーするにはクリック

コメント (0)

0/300

送信

おすすめ

論文校正アシスタント

Act as an experienced academic journal editor and deeply polish the provided English academic paper excerpt. Focus on checking and correcting grammatical errors, spelling mistakes, and punctuation usage, while optimizing sentence structures to improve the rigor and fluency of academic expression. Ensure accurate terminology usage and natural logical connections, adhering to the writing style guidelines of the target journal. Finally, list the main modifications and their reasons so I can understand the improvements.

論文校正アシスタント

Act as a senior academic editor and deeply polish the provided English research abstract. Focus on correcting grammatical errors, replacing colloquial terms with formal academic vocabulary, and optimizing sentence structures to enhance logical flow while preserving the original meaning, ensuring the final text meets the language standards of international SCI journals.

論文論理審査アシスタント

Act as a rigorous academic journal reviewer to carefully examine the provided academic paper excerpt, focusing on the logical coherence between core arguments and supporting evidence. You need to identify potential logical flaws such as reversed causality, sample bias, or overgeneralized conclusions in the argumentation process, and point out specific assertions in paragraphs that lack key data support. Additionally, evaluate whether literature citations accurately serve the current argument rather than merely acting as decorative stacking. Finally, provide revision suggestions in clear, objective academic language to help the author strengthen the rigor of the argumentation, ensuring the logical structure of the entire article is impeccable and meets high-level academic publication standards.

論文校正アシスタント

Act as a senior academic journal editor and deeply polish the provided English academic paper excerpt. Focus on identifying and correcting grammatical errors, inappropriate word choices, and monotonous sentence structures, ensuring the language meets the formal publication standards of international academic journals. Additionally, optimize the logical transitions between paragraphs to make the argumentation more rigorous and fluent, while preserving original technical terms and core viewpoints. Finally, briefly list the main modifications and their reasons to help the author understand the direction of improvement.

論文論理審査アシスタント

Act as a senior academic editor to review the provided research paragraph, focusing on identifying logical leaps or causal reversals between arguments and evidence, and directly point out specific sentences needing correction and their reasons to enhance argument coherence and academic rigor, avoiding any template openings.

論文論理審査アシスタント

Act as an academic consultant to carefully review the provided paper excerpt, focusing on evaluating the tightness of the logical connection between arguments and evidence, identifying any argumentative leaps or data interpretation biases, and offering specific revision suggestions for paragraph transitions to ensure the entire paper maintains high logical self-consistency and persuasiveness under academic standards.