Step-2-16K VS GLM-4-Plus
| Model Name | Affiliated organization | Release time | Model parameter quantity | Comprehensive score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Step-2-16K | StepFun | July 4, 2024 | N/A | 5.4 |
| GLM-4-Plus | Zhipu AI | August 30, 2024 | N/A | 6.5 |
Comprehensive score
Language dialogue
Knowledge reserve
Reasoning association
Mathematical calculation
Code writing
Command following
Swipe left and right to view more
Brief Comparison of Step-2-16K VS GLM-4-Plus AI Models
Comprehensive Capability Comparison
GLM-4-Plus still retains some practical value, whereas Step-2-16K lacks basic execution capability and is limited in applicability.
Language Understanding Comparison
Step-2-16K handles basic tasks; GLM-4-Plus often fails to communicate effectively.
Mathematical Reasoning Comparison
GLM-4-Plus has some limitations but remains functional for simple tasks. Step-2-16K frequently fails and is ineffective for meaningful reasoning.
