Step-2-16K VS GLM-4-9B-Chat
| Model Name | Affiliated organization | Release time | Model parameter quantity | Comprehensive score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Step-2-16K | StepFun | July 4, 2024 | N/A | 6.5 |
| GLM-4-9B-Chat | Zhipu AI | June 4, 2024 | 9B | 3.1 |
Comprehensive score
Language dialogue
Knowledge reserve
Reasoning association
Mathematical calculation
Code writing
Command following
Swipe left and right to view more
Brief Comparison of Step-2-16K VS GLM-4-9B-Chat AI Models
Comprehensive Capability Comparison
Step-2-16K still retains some practical value, whereas GLM-4-9B-Chat lacks basic execution capability and is limited in applicability.
Language Understanding Comparison
Both models are unreliable with high error rates, unsuitable for meaningful tasks.
Mathematical Reasoning Comparison
GLM-4-9B-Chat handles typical reasoning tasks effectively. Step-2-16K often generates flawed outputs or lacks contextual consistency.
