Llama4-Maverick-17B-128E-Instruct VS GLM-4-Plus
| Model Name | Affiliated organization | Release time | Model parameter quantity | Comprehensive score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Llama4-Maverick-17B-128E-Instruct | Meta | April 5, 2025 | 400B | 5.6 |
| GLM-4-Plus | Zhipu AI | August 30, 2024 | N/A | 6.5 |
Comprehensive score
Language dialogue
Knowledge reserve
Reasoning association
Mathematical calculation
Code writing
Command following
Swipe left and right to view more
Brief Comparison of Llama4-Maverick-17B-128E-Instruct VS GLM-4-Plus AI Models
Comprehensive Capability Comparison
GLM-4-Plus still retains some practical value, whereas Llama4-Maverick-17B-128E-Instruct lacks basic execution capability and is limited in applicability.
Language Understanding Comparison
Both models are unreliable with high error rates, unsuitable for meaningful tasks.
Mathematical Reasoning Comparison
GLM-4-Plus has some limitations but remains functional for simple tasks. Llama4-Maverick-17B-128E-Instruct frequently fails and is ineffective for meaningful reasoning.
