GLM-Z1-32B-0414 VS Step-2-16K
| Model Name | Affiliated organization | Release time | Model parameter quantity | Comprehensive score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLM-Z1-32B-0414 | Zhipu AI | April 14, 2025 | 32B | 6.9 |
| Step-2-16K | StepFun | July 4, 2024 | N/A | 5.4 |
Comprehensive score
Language dialogue
Knowledge reserve
Reasoning association
Mathematical calculation
Code writing
Command following
Swipe left and right to view more
Brief Comparison of GLM-Z1-32B-0414 VS Step-2-16K AI Models
Comprehensive Capability Comparison
GLM-Z1-32B-0414 still retains some practical value, whereas Step-2-16K lacks basic execution capability and is limited in applicability.
Language Understanding Comparison
GLM-Z1-32B-0414 performs well across most tasks; Step-2-16K’s output is error-prone and weak in complex scenarios.
Mathematical Reasoning Comparison
Both models are inadequate in reasoning and computation, frequently failing and unable to handle practical analytical tasks.
