Gemini-2.0-Flash-001 VS Qwen3-235B-A22B (Thinking)
| Model Name | Affiliated organization | Release time | Model parameter quantity | Comprehensive score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini-2.0-Flash-001 | February 5, 2025 | N/A | 5.8 | |
| Qwen3-235B-A22B (Thinking) | Alibaba | April 29, 2025 | 235B | 7.3 |
Comprehensive score
Language dialogue
Knowledge reserve
Reasoning association
Mathematical calculation
Code writing
Command following
Swipe left and right to view more
Brief Comparison of Gemini-2.0-Flash-001 VS Qwen3-235B-A22B (Thinking) AI Models
Comprehensive Capability Comparison
Qwen3-235B-A22B (Thinking) may not be top-tier but is practically useful, whereas Gemini-2.0-Flash-001 fails to effectively complete most command-based or multi-step tasks.
Language Understanding Comparison
Qwen3-235B-A22B (Thinking) performs well across most tasks; Gemini-2.0-Flash-001’s output is error-prone and weak in complex scenarios.
Mathematical Reasoning Comparison
Both models are inadequate in reasoning and computation, frequently failing and unable to handle practical analytical tasks.
