ERNIE-X1-Turbo-32K VS Qwen3-32B (Thinking)
| Model Name | Affiliated organization | Release time | Model parameter quantity | Comprehensive score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ERNIE-X1-Turbo-32K | Baidu | April 25, 2025 | N/A | 7.2 |
| Qwen3-32B (Thinking) | Alibaba | April 29, 2025 | 32B | 7.1 |
Comprehensive score
Language dialogue
Knowledge reserve
Reasoning association
Mathematical calculation
Code writing
Command following
Swipe left and right to view more
Brief Comparison of ERNIE-X1-Turbo-32K VS Qwen3-32B (Thinking) AI Models
Comprehensive Capability Comparison
ERNIE-X1-Turbo-32K demonstrates greater robustness, whereas Qwen3-32B (Thinking) has evident weaknesses in handling long task chains and contextual interactions.
Language Understanding Comparison
ERNIE-X1-Turbo-32K maintains steady performance, while Qwen3-32B (Thinking) often struggles with clarity and logical flow.
Mathematical Reasoning Comparison
Qwen3-32B (Thinking) has some limitations but remains functional for simple tasks. ERNIE-X1-Turbo-32K frequently fails and is ineffective for meaningful reasoning.
