Doubao-pro-32k-240828 VS GLM-4-0520
| Model Name | Affiliated organization | Release time | Model parameter quantity | Comprehensive score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Doubao-pro-32k-240828 | ByteDance | August 28, 2024 | N/A | 6.3 |
| GLM-4-0520 | Zhipu AI | January 16, 2024 | N/A | 5.5 |
Comprehensive score
Language dialogue
Knowledge reserve
Reasoning association
Mathematical calculation
Code writing
Command following
Swipe left and right to view more
Brief Comparison of Doubao-pro-32k-240828 VS GLM-4-0520 AI Models
Comprehensive Capability Comparison
Doubao-pro-32k-240828 still retains some practical value, whereas GLM-4-0520 lacks basic execution capability and is limited in applicability.
Language Understanding Comparison
Both models are unreliable with high error rates, unsuitable for meaningful tasks.
Mathematical Reasoning Comparison
Doubao-pro-32k-240828 exhibits high-level computational reasoning. GLM-4-0520 produces frequent errors, making it difficult to rely on for complex problem-solving.
