学術論文文献レビュー生成

家

AIプロンプト一覧

学者/教師

論文文献レビュー支援

${:__('collect %s',論文文献レビュー支援)}$

学者/教師

大学教員向けに、特定の研究分野における主要な文献と視点を迅速に整理するための学術支援ツール。

プロンプト内容

コピー

Act as a senior academic researcher and draft a rigorous literature review for the specific research topic I provide. First, identify key academic contributions from the last five years, summarize major theoretical schools and points of contention, and point out current research gaps or methodological limitations. Maintain an objective academic tone, avoid subjective assumptions, ensure logical coherence in citations, and conclude with insights for future research directions to assist faculty in course design or research topic selection.

コピー

シニアな学術研究者として振る舞い、私が提供する特定の研究トピックに対して、厳格な文献レビューを作成してください。まず、過去5年間の主要な学術的貢献を特定し、主要な理論学派と論争の焦点を要約し、現在の研究の空白や方法論的限界を指摘してください。客観的な学術的なトーンを維持し、主観的な推測を避け、引用の論理的整合性を確保し、将来の研究方向への示唆で結論づけ、教員のコースデザインや研究トピックの選択を支援してください。

コピー

共有リンクをコピーするにはクリック

コメント (1)

0/300

送信

JerryLopez

2026年10月14日 3:26:29 JST

这个Lit Review Assistant提示词结构很清晰，要求明确区分近五年贡献和研究空白，对学术写作很有帮助，但感觉对‘理论流派’的界定可能需要更多示例才更实用。

おすすめ

論文文献レビュー支援

Act as a senior academic researcher and write a detailed literature review for the provided research topic. First, outline core findings from the last five years, identifying major schools of thought and points of contention, while summarizing key theoretical models. Next, critically evaluate the limitations of existing research, pointing out methodological flaws or data gaps. Finally, based on this analysis, propose potential future research directions and theoretical breakthroughs, ensuring rigorous logic and standardized citations to support subsequent empirical studies.

論文文献レビュー支援

Act as a senior academic researcher and systematically review key scholarly literature from the past five years regarding my provided research topic. You need to identify major theoretical schools, core controversies, and recent research trends, summarizing existing contributions and gaps in a coherent paragraph format. Avoid lists or bullet points, ensuring the language adheres to academic standards and logical rigor, ultimately forming a complete literature review background description.

論文文献レビュー支援

Act as a senior academic researcher to synthesize key literature for a specific research topic and keywords provided by the user. Identify main theoretical frameworks, controversies, and recent trends from the last five years. Write a coherent literature review in natural language that compares core viewpoints, evaluates methodologies, discusses limitations, and suggests future research directions, ensuring logical rigor and academic standards.

論文文献レビュー支援

Act as a senior academic researcher. For the specific research topic I provide, synthesize key academic literature from the last five years. Identify major theoretical schools, summarize core controversies, and point out current research gaps. Finally, construct a logically rigorous review framework based on this analysis, suggesting three to five innovative future research directions, ensuring content meets academic standards and citation formats are correct.

論文文献レビュー支援

Act as a senior academic researcher. For the specific research topic provided by the user, retrieve and integrate key academic literature from the past five years. You need to identify core controversies in the field, major theoretical schools, and recent empirical findings, and sort out the evolutionary trajectory from classical theories to frontier research. Finally, generate a structured literature review outline containing main viewpoints, methodological differences, and future research gaps, ensuring logical coherence and standardized citations to support the user's thesis writing needs.

論文文献レビュー支援

Act as an academic researcher specializing in higher education. Based on the provided research topic and core reference list, draft a rigorous literature review. Identify major theoretical schools, compare methodological differences among scholars, and highlight gaps or controversies in current research. Ensure the language is objective, formal, and adheres to academic standards, avoiding colloquialisms. Logically connect these viewpoints to form a critical review text that assists faculty in course syllabus design or research planning.