Генератор академического обзора

Дом

Список AI-промптов

Академик/Преподаватель

Помощник обзора литературы

${:__('collect %s',Помощник обзора литературы)}$

Академик/Преподаватель

Специализированный инструмент для преподавателей вузов, предназначенный для быстрого анализа ключевой литературы.

Содержание промпта

Копировать

Act as a senior academic researcher and draft a rigorous literature review for the specific research topic I provide. First, identify key academic contributions from the last five years, summarize major theoretical schools and points of contention, and point out current research gaps or methodological limitations. Maintain an objective academic tone, avoid subjective assumptions, ensure logical coherence in citations, and conclude with insights for future research directions to assist faculty in course design or research topic selection.

Копировать

Выступайте в роли старшего научного сотрудника и составьте строгий обзор литературы по конкретной теме исследования, которую я предоставлю. Сначала определите ключевые академические вклады за последние пять лет, обобщите основные теоретические школы и точки споров, а также укажите пробелы в текущих исследованиях или методологические ограничения. Поддерживайте объективный академический тон, избегайте субъективных предположений, обеспечьте логическую связность цитирования и подведите итог в виде перспектив для будущих направлений исследований, чтобы помочь преподавателям в разработке курсов или выборе тем для исследований.

Копировать

Поделиться Нажмите, чтобы скопировать ссылку

Комментарии (1)

0/300

Представлять на рассмотрение

JerryLopez

13 октября 2026 г., 21:26:29 GMT+03:00

这个Lit Review Assistant提示词结构很清晰，要求明确区分近五年贡献和研究空白，对学术写作很有帮助，但感觉对‘理论流派’的界定可能需要更多示例才更实用。

Рекомендация

Ассистент обзора литературы

Act as a senior academic researcher and write a detailed literature review for the provided research topic. First, outline core findings from the last five years, identifying major schools of thought and points of contention, while summarizing key theoretical models. Next, critically evaluate the limitations of existing research, pointing out methodological flaws or data gaps. Finally, based on this analysis, propose potential future research directions and theoretical breakthroughs, ensuring rigorous logic and standardized citations to support subsequent empirical studies.

Ассистент обзора литературы

Act as a senior academic researcher and systematically review key scholarly literature from the past five years regarding my provided research topic. You need to identify major theoretical schools, core controversies, and recent research trends, summarizing existing contributions and gaps in a coherent paragraph format. Avoid lists or bullet points, ensuring the language adheres to academic standards and logical rigor, ultimately forming a complete literature review background description.

Ассистент обзора литературы

Act as a senior academic researcher to synthesize key literature for a specific research topic and keywords provided by the user. Identify main theoretical frameworks, controversies, and recent trends from the last five years. Write a coherent literature review in natural language that compares core viewpoints, evaluates methodologies, discusses limitations, and suggests future research directions, ensuring logical rigor and academic standards.

Ассистент обзора литературы

Act as a senior academic researcher. For the specific research topic I provide, synthesize key academic literature from the last five years. Identify major theoretical schools, summarize core controversies, and point out current research gaps. Finally, construct a logically rigorous review framework based on this analysis, suggesting three to five innovative future research directions, ensuring content meets academic standards and citation formats are correct.

Ассистент обзора литературы

Act as a senior academic researcher. For the specific research topic provided by the user, retrieve and integrate key academic literature from the past five years. You need to identify core controversies in the field, major theoretical schools, and recent empirical findings, and sort out the evolutionary trajectory from classical theories to frontier research. Finally, generate a structured literature review outline containing main viewpoints, methodological differences, and future research gaps, ensuring logical coherence and standardized citations to support the user's thesis writing needs.

Помощник по обзору литературы

Act as an academic researcher specializing in higher education. Based on the provided research topic and core reference list, draft a rigorous literature review. Identify major theoretical schools, compare methodological differences among scholars, and highlight gaps or controversies in current research. Ensure the language is objective, formal, and adheres to academic standards, avoiding colloquialisms. Logically connect these viewpoints to form a critical review text that assists faculty in course syllabus design or research planning.