家
論文文法修正アシスタント
学者/教師
33
33
学術執筆用に設計された文法修正プロンプト。教師や学生が論文の言語エラーを迅速に修正し、テキストの規範性と可読性を向上させるのを支援します。
プロンプト内容
コピー
コピー
Act as an expert academic editor. Carefully review the following academic paper excerpt, identify and correct any grammatical errors, punctuation misuse, or unnatural phrasing, while maintaining the original academic tone and technical terminology. Finally, output the corrected full paragraph.
コピー
あなたは学術英語に精通した編集者として、以下の学術論文の段落を注意深く審査し、文法エラー、句読点の誤用、不自然な表現を特定して修正してください。元の学術的なトーンと専門用語は維持したまま、修正後の完全な段落を出力してください。
コピー
コメント (0)
0/300
おすすめ
論文文献レビュー支援
Act as a senior academic researcher and write a detailed literature review for the provided research topic. First, outline core findings from the last five years, identifying major schools of thought and points of contention, while summarizing key theoretical models. Next, critically evaluate the limitations of existing research, pointing out methodological flaws or data gaps. Finally, based on this analysis, propose potential future research directions and theoretical breakthroughs, ensuring rigorous logic and standardized citations to support subsequent empirical studies.
論文文献レビュー支援
Act as a senior academic researcher and systematically review key scholarly literature from the past five years regarding my provided research topic. You need to identify major theoretical schools, core controversies, and recent research trends, summarizing existing contributions and gaps in a coherent paragraph format. Avoid lists or bullet points, ensuring the language adheres to academic standards and logical rigor, ultimately forming a complete literature review background description.
論文文献レビュー支援
Act as a senior academic researcher to synthesize key literature for a specific research topic and keywords provided by the user. Identify main theoretical frameworks, controversies, and recent trends from the last five years. Write a coherent literature review in natural language that compares core viewpoints, evaluates methodologies, discusses limitations, and suggests future research directions, ensuring logical rigor and academic standards.
論文文献レビュー支援
Act as a senior academic researcher. For the specific research topic I provide, synthesize key academic literature from the last five years. Identify major theoretical schools, summarize core controversies, and point out current research gaps. Finally, construct a logically rigorous review framework based on this analysis, suggesting three to five innovative future research directions, ensuring content meets academic standards and citation formats are correct.
論文文献レビュー支援
Act as a senior academic researcher. For the specific research topic provided by the user, retrieve and integrate key academic literature from the past five years. You need to identify core controversies in the field, major theoretical schools, and recent empirical findings, and sort out the evolutionary trajectory from classical theories to frontier research. Finally, generate a structured literature review outline containing main viewpoints, methodological differences, and future research gaps, ensuring logical coherence and standardized citations to support the user's thesis writing needs.
論文文献レビュー支援
Act as an academic researcher specializing in higher education. Based on the provided research topic and core reference list, draft a rigorous literature review. Identify major theoretical schools, compare methodological differences among scholars, and highlight gaps or controversies in current research. Ensure the language is objective, formal, and adheres to academic standards, avoiding colloquialisms. Logically connect these viewpoints to form a critical review text that assists faculty in course syllabus design or research planning.
