Prueba Automática de Artículos

Hogar

Lista de Prompts de IA

Académico/Profesor

Corrector Gramática Académica

${:__('collect %s',Corrector Gramática Académica)}$

Académico/Profesor

Un prompt diseñado para la edición académica para ayudar a los profesores y estudiantes a corregir rápidamente errores gramaticales en artículos, mejorando la conformidad y la legibilidad.

Contenido del prompt

Copiar

Act as an expert academic editor. Carefully review the following academic paper excerpt, identify and correct any grammatical errors, punctuation misuse, or unnatural phrasing, while maintaining the original academic tone and technical terminology. Finally, output the corrected full paragraph.

Copiar

Actúe como un editor experto en inglés académico. Revise cuidadosamente el siguiente fragmento de artículo académico, identifique y corrija cualquier error gramatical, uso incorrecto de la puntuación o redacción poco natural, manteniendo el tono académico y la terminología técnica originales. Finalmente, emita el párrafo completo corregido.

Copiar

Compartir Haga clic para copiar el enlace

comentario (0)

0/300

Enviar

Recomendación

Asistente Revisión Literatura

Act as a senior academic researcher and write a detailed literature review for the provided research topic. First, outline core findings from the last five years, identifying major schools of thought and points of contention, while summarizing key theoretical models. Next, critically evaluate the limitations of existing research, pointing out methodological flaws or data gaps. Finally, based on this analysis, propose potential future research directions and theoretical breakthroughs, ensuring rigorous logic and standardized citations to support subsequent empirical studies.

Asistente de Revisión de Literatura

Act as a senior academic researcher and systematically review key scholarly literature from the past five years regarding my provided research topic. You need to identify major theoretical schools, core controversies, and recent research trends, summarizing existing contributions and gaps in a coherent paragraph format. Avoid lists or bullet points, ensuring the language adheres to academic standards and logical rigor, ultimately forming a complete literature review background description.

Asistente de Revisión de Literatura

Act as a senior academic researcher to synthesize key literature for a specific research topic and keywords provided by the user. Identify main theoretical frameworks, controversies, and recent trends from the last five years. Write a coherent literature review in natural language that compares core viewpoints, evaluates methodologies, discusses limitations, and suggests future research directions, ensuring logical rigor and academic standards.

Asistente de Revisión de Literatura

Act as a senior academic researcher. For the specific research topic I provide, synthesize key academic literature from the last five years. Identify major theoretical schools, summarize core controversies, and point out current research gaps. Finally, construct a logically rigorous review framework based on this analysis, suggesting three to five innovative future research directions, ensuring content meets academic standards and citation formats are correct.

Asistente de Revisión de Literatura

Act as a senior academic researcher. For the specific research topic provided by the user, retrieve and integrate key academic literature from the past five years. You need to identify core controversies in the field, major theoretical schools, and recent empirical findings, and sort out the evolutionary trajectory from classical theories to frontier research. Finally, generate a structured literature review outline containing main viewpoints, methodological differences, and future research gaps, ensuring logical coherence and standardized citations to support the user's thesis writing needs.

Asistente de Revisión de Literatura

Act as an academic researcher specializing in higher education. Based on the provided research topic and core reference list, draft a rigorous literature review. Identify major theoretical schools, compare methodological differences among scholars, and highlight gaps or controversies in current research. Ensure the language is objective, formal, and adheres to academic standards, avoiding colloquialisms. Logically connect these viewpoints to form a critical review text that assists faculty in course syllabus design or research planning.