シラバス準拠の大学ミクロ経済学期末試験の作成

家

AIプロンプト一覧

学者/教師

大学ミクロ経済学試験問題作成ツール

${:__('collect %s',大学ミクロ経済学試験問題作成ツール)}$

学者/教師

指定された範囲・難易度・問題形式に基づき、完全な大学ミクロ経済学期末試験を作成し、解答と採点基準を提供します。

プロンプト内容

コピー

You create a 100-point closed-book final exam for undergraduate economics majors following common Chinese university syllabi, covering demand-supply elasticity, consumer behavior, producer theory and market structure, with 40 percent basic, 40 percent intermediate and 20 percent advanced questions including multiple choice, terms explanation, calculation and essay questions, plus full answers and point allocations for each question.

コピー

国内の大学で一般的なミクロ経済学のシラバスに沿って、需要供給と弾力性、消費者行動、生産者理論、市場構造の4つのコアモジュールを対象に、基礎問題40％、中級問題40％、難問20％の難易度比率で、単一選択問題、用語解説、計算問題、論述問題の4種類の出題形式からなる期末筆記試験を作成し、各問題の標準解答と配点を記載し、経営経済学部の本科生向け100点満点の試験要件に適合させます。

コピー

共有リンクをコピーするにはクリック

コメント (0)

0/300

送信

おすすめ

論文文献レビュー支援

Act as a senior academic researcher. For the provided research topic, synthesize core literature from the last five years, identify key academic debates, summarize current research limitations, and propose three innovative future research directions with rigorous logic and standard citations.

論文文献レビュー支援

Act as a senior academic researcher. Based on the specific subject matter and key reference list I provide, write an in-depth literature review. First, map the research trajectory and identify core controversies and theoretical evolutions. Then, synthesize major viewpoints from various scholars, highlighting current research gaps and limitations. Finally, propose forward-looking future research directions. Ensure the language is rigorous and logical, strictly adhering to academic citation norms without subjective speculation, aiming to provide a solid theoretical and empirical foundation for my subsequent research.

論文文献レビュー支援

Act as a senior academic researcher and write a detailed literature review for the provided research topic. First, outline core findings from the last five years, identifying major schools of thought and points of contention, while summarizing key theoretical models. Next, critically evaluate the limitations of existing research, pointing out methodological flaws or data gaps. Finally, based on this analysis, propose potential future research directions and theoretical breakthroughs, ensuring rigorous logic and standardized citations to support subsequent empirical studies.

論文文献レビュー支援

Act as a senior academic researcher and systematically review key scholarly literature from the past five years regarding my provided research topic. You need to identify major theoretical schools, core controversies, and recent research trends, summarizing existing contributions and gaps in a coherent paragraph format. Avoid lists or bullet points, ensuring the language adheres to academic standards and logical rigor, ultimately forming a complete literature review background description.

論文文献レビュー支援

Act as a senior academic researcher to synthesize key literature for a specific research topic and keywords provided by the user. Identify main theoretical frameworks, controversies, and recent trends from the last five years. Write a coherent literature review in natural language that compares core viewpoints, evaluates methodologies, discusses limitations, and suggests future research directions, ensuring logical rigor and academic standards.

論文文献レビュー支援

Act as a senior academic researcher. For the specific research topic I provide, synthesize key academic literature from the last five years. Identify major theoretical schools, summarize core controversies, and point out current research gaps. Finally, construct a logically rigorous review framework based on this analysis, suggesting three to five innovative future research directions, ensuring content meets academic standards and citation formats are correct.