Option
Heim KI-Prompt-Liste Akademiker/Lehrer Hochschul-Mikroökonomie-Prüfungsgenerator

Hochschul-Mikroökonomie-Prüfungsgenerator

{:__('collect %s',Hochschul-Mikroökonomie-Prüfungsgenerator)}

Erstellt eine vollständige Hochschul-Mikroökonomie Abschlussprüfung mit Antworten und Bewertungsmaßstäben nach angegebenen Parametern.

Prompt-Inhalt Kopieren Kopieren

You create a 100-point closed-book final exam for undergraduate economics majors following common Chinese university syllabi, covering demand-supply elasticity, consumer behavior, producer theory and market structure, with 40 percent basic, 40 percent intermediate and 20 percent advanced questions including multiple choice, terms explanation, calculation and essay questions, plus full answers and point allocations for each question.

Kopieren Kopieren

Sie erstellen eine 100-Punkte geschlossene Abschlussprüfung für Bachelor-Studenten der Wirtschafts- und Managementwissenschaften gemäß dem gängigen Hochschullehrplan für Mikroökonomie, die Angebot-Nachfrage und Elastizität, Konsumentenverhalten, Produzententheorie und Marktstruktur abdeckt, mit 40 Prozent Basis-, 40 Prozent Mittel- und 20 Prozent Schwierigkeitsfragen einschließlich Multiple Choice, Begriffserklärung, Berechnung und Aufsatz, sowie vollständigen Antworten und Punktverteilungen für jede Frage.

Kopieren Kopieren
Kommentare (0)
0/300

Empfehlung

Lit-Review-Assistent
Act as a senior academic researcher. For the provided research topic, synthesize core literature from the last five years, identify key academic debates, summarize current research limitations, and propose three innovative future research directions with rigorous logic and standard citations.
Lit-Review-Assistent
Act as a senior academic researcher. Based on the specific subject matter and key reference list I provide, write an in-depth literature review. First, map the research trajectory and identify core controversies and theoretical evolutions. Then, synthesize major viewpoints from various scholars, highlighting current research gaps and limitations. Finally, propose forward-looking future research directions. Ensure the language is rigorous and logical, strictly adhering to academic citation norms without subjective speculation, aiming to provide a solid theoretical and empirical foundation for my subsequent research.
Lit Review Assistent
Act as a senior academic researcher and write a detailed literature review for the provided research topic. First, outline core findings from the last five years, identifying major schools of thought and points of contention, while summarizing key theoretical models. Next, critically evaluate the limitations of existing research, pointing out methodological flaws or data gaps. Finally, based on this analysis, propose potential future research directions and theoretical breakthroughs, ensuring rigorous logic and standardized citations to support subsequent empirical studies.
Literaturübersicht-Assistent
Act as a senior academic researcher and systematically review key scholarly literature from the past five years regarding my provided research topic. You need to identify major theoretical schools, core controversies, and recent research trends, summarizing existing contributions and gaps in a coherent paragraph format. Avoid lists or bullet points, ensuring the language adheres to academic standards and logical rigor, ultimately forming a complete literature review background description.
Literaturübersicht-Assistent
Act as a senior academic researcher to synthesize key literature for a specific research topic and keywords provided by the user. Identify main theoretical frameworks, controversies, and recent trends from the last five years. Write a coherent literature review in natural language that compares core viewpoints, evaluates methodologies, discusses limitations, and suggests future research directions, ensuring logical rigor and academic standards.
Lit-Review-Assistent
Act as a senior academic researcher. For the specific research topic I provide, synthesize key academic literature from the last five years. Identify major theoretical schools, summarize core controversies, and point out current research gaps. Finally, construct a logically rigorous review framework based on this analysis, suggesting three to five innovative future research directions, ensuring content meets academic standards and citation formats are correct.
OR