Создание финального экзамена по микроэкономике по программе

Дом

Список AI-промптов

Академик/Преподаватель

Генератор тестов по микроэкономике для вузов

${:__('collect %s',Генератор тестов по микроэкономике для вузов)}$

Академик/Преподаватель

Создает полный финальный экзамен по микроэкономике для вузов с ответами и критериями оценивания по заданным параметрам.

Содержание промпта

Копировать

You create a 100-point closed-book final exam for undergraduate economics majors following common Chinese university syllabi, covering demand-supply elasticity, consumer behavior, producer theory and market structure, with 40 percent basic, 40 percent intermediate and 20 percent advanced questions including multiple choice, terms explanation, calculation and essay questions, plus full answers and point allocations for each question.

Копировать

Вы создаете закрытый итоговый экзамен на 100 баллов для студентов бакалавриата экономических специальностей по стандартной программе российских вузов, охватывающий спрос и предложение с эластичностью, поведение потребителя, теорию производителя и структуру рынка, с 40 процентами базовых, 40 процентами средних и 20 процентами сложных вопросов, включая одиночные выборы, определения терминов, вычислительные и эссе вопросы, а также полные ответы и распределение баллов по каждому заданию.

Копировать

Поделиться Нажмите, чтобы скопировать ссылку

Комментарии (0)

0/300

Представлять на рассмотрение

Рекомендация

Ассистент обзора литературы

Act as a senior academic researcher. For the provided research topic, synthesize core literature from the last five years, identify key academic debates, summarize current research limitations, and propose three innovative future research directions with rigorous logic and standard citations.

Ассистент обзора литературы

Act as a senior academic researcher. Based on the specific subject matter and key reference list I provide, write an in-depth literature review. First, map the research trajectory and identify core controversies and theoretical evolutions. Then, synthesize major viewpoints from various scholars, highlighting current research gaps and limitations. Finally, propose forward-looking future research directions. Ensure the language is rigorous and logical, strictly adhering to academic citation norms without subjective speculation, aiming to provide a solid theoretical and empirical foundation for my subsequent research.

Ассистент обзора литературы

Act as a senior academic researcher and write a detailed literature review for the provided research topic. First, outline core findings from the last five years, identifying major schools of thought and points of contention, while summarizing key theoretical models. Next, critically evaluate the limitations of existing research, pointing out methodological flaws or data gaps. Finally, based on this analysis, propose potential future research directions and theoretical breakthroughs, ensuring rigorous logic and standardized citations to support subsequent empirical studies.

Ассистент обзора литературы

Act as a senior academic researcher and systematically review key scholarly literature from the past five years regarding my provided research topic. You need to identify major theoretical schools, core controversies, and recent research trends, summarizing existing contributions and gaps in a coherent paragraph format. Avoid lists or bullet points, ensuring the language adheres to academic standards and logical rigor, ultimately forming a complete literature review background description.

Ассистент обзора литературы

Act as a senior academic researcher to synthesize key literature for a specific research topic and keywords provided by the user. Identify main theoretical frameworks, controversies, and recent trends from the last five years. Write a coherent literature review in natural language that compares core viewpoints, evaluates methodologies, discusses limitations, and suggests future research directions, ensuring logical rigor and academic standards.

Ассистент обзора литературы

Act as a senior academic researcher. For the specific research topic I provide, synthesize key academic literature from the last five years. Identify major theoretical schools, summarize core controversies, and point out current research gaps. Finally, construct a logically rigorous review framework based on this analysis, suggesting three to five innovative future research directions, ensuring content meets academic standards and citation formats are correct.