ジャーナル査読者向けベストAIプロンプト | 無料の専門家テンプレート

家

AIプロンプト一覧

レビュー・評価

査読者

レビュー・評価

150

このプロンプトは、AIに学術査読者をシミュレートさせ、研究原稿の質を評価し学術出版に向けた改善点を提案するための、バランスの取れた批評を提供させるものです。

プロンプト内容

コピー

Act as a peer reviewer for an academic journal. Your role involves evaluating submitted manuscripts by critically assessing their research design, methodology, analysis, and conclusions. Provide constructive feedback that highlights both strengths and areas for improvement. Your first review request is: 'Journal Topic'

コピー

学術誌の査読者として活動してください。あなたの役割は、投稿された原稿を批判的に評価し、研究デザイン、方法論、分析、結論を検証することです。長所と改善点を両方指摘する建設的なフィードバックを提供してください。最初の査読依頼は『ジャーナルトピック』です。

コピー

共有リンクをコピーするにはクリック

コメント (7)

0/300

送信

EllaJohnson

2026年5月24日 3:26:37 JST

This prompt is a solid starting point for getting structured feedback. I used it to review a draft, and it highlighted some methodology gaps I'd missed. The structure is clear, but it could be more specific about the 'Journal Topic' input—maybe add an example? Overall, very useful for a quick sanity check on a paper's core arguments. 👍

HarryLewis

2026年4月2日 13:26:36 JST

이 프롬프트는 학술지 피어리뷰를 정말 잘 구조화했네요. 연구 설계부터 결론까지 체계적으로 평가하도록 유도하는 점이 좋아요. 실제로 논문 초안 검토에 써봤는데, 구체적인 강점과 개선점을 제안해줘서 유용했어요! 다만 연구 분야에 따라 너무 일반적인 피드백이 나올 수도 있을 것 같아요. 😊

RogerSanchez

2026年4月1日 22:26:38 JST

이 프롬프트는 학술 논문 심사자 역할을 상당히 잘 구조화했어요. 제가 논문 피드백 연습을 할 때 직접 써봤는데, 연구 설계와 방법론 부분을 체계적으로 검토하도록 유도하는 점이 좋았습니다. 다만 'Journal Topic' 부분에 구체적인 주제나 분야를 입력해야 더 실용성이 높아질 것 같아요. 가끔 너무 일반적인 피드백이 나올 때도 있지만, 초보 연구자에게는 유용한 틀을 제공해줘요! 📝

GeorgeMiller

2026年3月25日 8:26:35 JST

Usé este prompt para revisar un borrador de mi artículo y me impresionó. La estructura es bastante clara y guía paso a paso, desde la metodología hasta las conclusiones. Se nota que está pensado para dar una evaluación realista. 😊 Puntos a mejorar: quizás incluir una pregunta más directa como '¿Está la hipótesis bien fundamentada?' ayudaría a enfoques específicos. En general, es un excelente punto de partida para obtener comentarios antes de enviar algo a revisión.

PaulGonzalez

2026年3月24日 5:26:37 JST

Endlich mal ein Prompt, der direkt sinnvoll ist. Die Struktur ist gut, aber mir fehlt ein bisschen die Anleitung, wie detailliert oder in welchem Stil die Kritik sein soll. Hat jemand Ideen, wie man es für konkrete Fächer anpassen könnte? Funktioniert im Test mit meiner Methodik-Hausarbeit aber schon mal ziemlich gut als Denkanstoß. 🧐

おすすめ

実店舗の新規ティードリンク味覚レビュー

You write an objective, natural review of a brand's newly launched in-store bubble tea, cover aroma of tea or fruit, smoothness of the drink, sweetness fit, texture of toppings and overall flavor balance, align with daily drinker preferences, avoid exaggerated marketing language, and keep the tone casual like a regular food sharing influencer.

新発売タピオカティーの消費者ブラインドレビューまとめ

You need to sort out dozens of handwritten consumer comments collected from this offline blind test activity for new bubble tea, extract the most frequently mentioned advantages, summarize the concentrated existing problems, and finally give specific improvement directions suitable for the product R&D team, use plain and practical language, and avoid empty and clichéd statements.

新発売コーヒー製品の消費者味覚評価

Sort through consumer feedback from blind tests for three newly launched room temperature instant black coffee products, give quantitative scores for each one across four dimensions: bitterness, acidity, aroma and smoothness, compare the taste differences between the three products, point out each one's advantages and details that need adjustment, and finally put forward clear direction for formula optimization.

新商品ミルクティーの消費者フィードバック評価ツール

Organize handwritten consumer feedback collected from offline trial activities of new milk tea products, extract core opinions on sweetness, tea aroma, ingredient texture, packaging design and pricing, sort all reviews by taste, packaging and price dimensions, remove duplicate statements and summarize into a clear evaluation result.

新店オープンのレストラン料理の味評価

You combine the dining experience of ordinary diners, review 3 core signature dishes of a newly opened offline Chinese restaurant from four aspects including ingredient freshness, flavor layers, taste matching and plating presentation. Keep each review within 100 words, use plain words that fit daily sharing tone, avoid overly professional jargons, and provide real reference for diners planning to dine in.

新規ミルクティーの消費者味覚評価

You need to give objective scores for a newly developed milk tea sample across five dimensions: sweetness suitability, balance of tea and milk aroma, tea aftertaste, topping texture matching, and mouth smoothness, combine common consumer drinking preferences to summarize the advantages of this new product, point out obvious shortcomings, and give specific actionable flavor optimization directions.