OpenAI's AI Trained on Paywalled O’Reilly Books, Researchers Claim

# openai

OpenAI has faced numerous accusations of using copyrighted material without permission to train its AI models. A recent study by the AI Disclosures Project, a nonprofit established in 2024 by media mogul Tim O’Reilly and economist Ilan Strauss, suggests that OpenAI may have used non-public books from O’Reilly Media to train its more advanced model, GPT-4o. AI models, essentially sophisticated prediction engines, are trained on vast datasets including books, movies, and TV shows. They learn patterns and generate responses based on these patterns, not creating anything truly new but rather approximating from their extensive knowledge base. As real-world data sources like the public web become exhausted, some AI labs, including OpenAI, have started using AI-generated data for training, though few have completely abandoned real-world data due to the risks of degrading model performance. The AI Disclosures Project's paper claims that OpenAI's GPT-4o model, which is the default in ChatGPT, shows a strong recognition of content from paywalled O’Reilly books, unlike the earlier GPT-3.5 Turbo model. The paper suggests that GPT-4o was likely trained on these non-public books, despite O’Reilly Media not having a licensing agreement with OpenAI. The study employed a method called DE-COP, introduced in 2024, to detect copyrighted content in AI training data. This "membership inference attack" tests whether a model can distinguish between human-authored texts and AI-generated paraphrases, indicating prior knowledge of the text if it can do so reliably. The researchers tested GPT-4o, GPT-3.5 Turbo, and other OpenAI models using 13,962 paragraph excerpts from 34 O’Reilly books, finding that GPT-4o recognized significantly more paywalled content than the older models. While the authors acknowledge that their method isn't foolproof and that the paywalled content might have been introduced by users copying and pasting into ChatGPT, the findings raise questions about OpenAI's data practices. The study did not evaluate OpenAI's latest models, such as GPT-4.5 and reasoning models like o3-mini and o1, leaving open the possibility that these might not have been trained on the same data. OpenAI has been pushing for more relaxed copyright laws regarding AI training data and has been seeking higher-quality data sources. The company has even hired journalists to refine its models' outputs, a practice seen across the AI industry where experts in various fields are recruited to enhance AI systems. OpenAI does pay for some of its training data, having licensing agreements with various content providers and offering opt-out mechanisms for copyright owners. However, as the company faces legal challenges over its data practices, the findings of the O’Reilly paper cast a shadow over its operations. OpenAI did not respond to requests for comment on the study.

Related article

Comments (40)